Only two out of the 110 pounds of fissile material in the nuclear bomb actually blew up on Hiroshima. In the article, “The Hiroshima Bombing: What you need to know about the nuclear attack,” by The Los Angeles Times, it proceeds to state facts about the Hiroshima bombing and about President Obama’s trip to Japan. Obama is the first president to visit Hiroshima since the bombing and has clearly stated that it is not an apology trip. About 140,000 people were killed in the bombing from the initial blast or by radiation poisoning. Not only Japanese were killed, a dozen Americans and 20,000 Koreans were also killed.
The atomic bomb was not the right way of getting around the war. One alternative would be showing an example of what the bomb could do and the destruction it would have caused(historyofthenet.com). If we would have done this instead of immediately dropping the bomb thousands of lives would have been saved and resources wouldn't have been used up for such
The actions authorized by President Truman on August 6, 1945 to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan would be proven to be unjustified in the years that followed. Actions of this type can divide and break a once unified nation. Deciding if the united States bombing Japan was justified or not would depend on how well you know the topic. Looking deeper into the bombing will reveal the horrendous truth.
On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an Atomic bomb called the Little Boy on Hiroshima in Japan. A few days later the united states dropped another atomic bomb called the Fat man on the city of Nagasaki. The dropping of an atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the wars quickly, as Japan saw the devastating effects it had on their people and country. The decision to drop the bomb was a very hard one to agree on but changed lives for others. There are many pros and cons of the atomic bombs.
On August 6th through 9th, 1945, the United States made a controversial decision that changed the course of history. The Atomic Bombing caused an upshot for America to the Japanese. Four years prior, Japan made a surprise attack on the United States Pacific Naval base, Pearl Harbor, on December 7th, 1941. Although Japan had experienced crucial damage from the atomic bomb, the US decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a morally justifiable act of self defense. It prevented further American casualties to ending World War II, which also allowed Japan to be held accountable for their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.
The Atomic Bomb was only supposed to be used for defense only. In August 1945, President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. I think Enola Gay shouldn’t have dropped the Atomic Bomb. I’m going to tell you why.
On August 6th, 1945, the U.S. B-29 aircraft the “Enola Gay” dropped the nuclear bomb “Little Boy” on Hiroshima Japan. During WWII, the Japanese attacked one of our bases in Hawaii called Pearl Harbor. They destroyed around 20 U.S. ships, and 300 planes. They killed around 2,400 soldiers, sailors, and civilians. Americans knew the Japanese were planning some kind of attack on the US, but they never expected it to be at Pearl Harbor.
The atomic bomb should be supported by the U.S. because of the following reason. Many people supported the bombing because the Japanese were given a fair warning. The supporters argument states, “Additionally, bomb supporters argue that Japanese civilians were warned in advance through millions of leaflets dropped on Japanese cities by U.S. warplanes. In the months preceding the atomic bombings, some 63 million leaflets were dropped on 35 cities target for destruction by U.S. air forces. The Japanese people generally regarded the information on these leaflets as truthful, but anyone caught in possession of one was subject to arrest by the government.
In an article published by The Atlantic Karl L. Compton gives his take on the dropping of two nuclear warheads on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While reflecting he comes to the conclusion that dropping the bombs was indeed the appropriate. I agree fully that this was the right course of action, as the Japanese had proven up to this point that they weren’t willing to back down. An alternative attack wouldn’t have been as potent, and dropping the nukes prevented greater casualty numbers. Keep in mind this wasn’t just a hasty decision made by our world leaders “Then, shortly before Hiroshima, I became attached to General MacArthur in Manila, and lived for two months with his staff.
I think that the Atomic bomb shouldn’t have been invented but I think dropping the Atomic Bomb was necessary to help and show the danger of it. If the atomic bomb was never dropped anything could have happened Russia could have dealt with it, but if that happened Japan would still be working on military weapons, and try to take of the Pacific again or tag team on America. Since America dropped the Atomic bomb the world learned the power and danger of it, and seeing the survivors and the environment showed that the U.S had no idea on what power they were up against. If the U.S didn’t drop the bomb some other country would figure out the power and try to take over the world with it or end up destroying it. The radiation from the two atomic bombs
First of all, an Atomic Bomb was made primarily as a defensive weapon to try and avoid and use it more as a threat to stop a war and prevent wars/conflicts. “It was intended to be a deterrent, to make Germany or any other enemy think twice before using such a weapon against the United States.” [1]. The bomb was originally created to try and match the Germans and they feared that while Germany was on their way creating a bomb, the United Sates were just sitting idle. It is worth noting that since the use of the atomic bomb over 70 years ago, it has only been used as a deterrent ever since.
Hey, have you heard of the atomic bomb? Yeah, one of the biggest bombs in the world, that we dropped on Japan and killed around around 80,000. Looking back in history, do you believe that we should have dropped the atomic bomb? Well, i do and here’s my reasons why.
The article on the site "History" titled"Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki", discusses the bomb's impact on civilians. In this article, it is written that these bombings resulted in civilian casualties reaching numbers around 70,000-135,000 in Hiroshima. In Nagasaki, the estimated casualties were from 60,000-80,000.
Should the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be remembered as a war crime or a necessary evil? As far as I am concerned, I think the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should be remembered as a necessary evil. In my mind, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved many people whoever is American or Japanese.
According to U.S. estimated, 60,000 to 70,000 people were killed by the bomb, 140,000 were injured many more were made homeless as a result of the bomb and some of them were missing. A very dangerous radiation reached over 100,000 kilometers. In the blast, thousands of people died instantly. The city is completely destroyed, there are 90,000 buildings and 60,000 of them were completely destroyed by the explosion. In all, approximately 33% or ⅓ of Hiroshima is completely destroyed.
