ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Regarding The Use Of Nuclear Weapons In War

494 Words2 Pages
The onset of World War II advanced nuclear research by decades. In 1938, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassman showed that matter could be transformed into energy by firing neutrons at uranium. They found that a chain reaction was possible, in which the splitting or fission of one uranium atom would release neutrons that would turn cause other atoms to break up. Although the atom bomb ended one war, it almost immediately started another one. There are various pros and cons regarding the using of nuclear weapons in war. There are several reasons why the nuclear weapons should have been used. The first being that the blast from a plutonium bomb would be equivalent to twenty thousand tons of dynamite. On August 6 and 9, 1945, two bombs were dropped on
Show More
Related
310 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

Read More
216 Words | 1 Pages

It 's challenging to look back at events and understand the logic of using an atomic bomb without allowing one scrap of knowledge to creep into our decision making. All of this being said, it 's still possible to come to the conclusion that using this weapon was wrong. The belief that a military blockade would end the war wasn 't believed any more than a military blockade without invasion of Germany would work. The notion that Japan was teetering on surrender is silly.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

Some of the reasons why the United States should have used the bomb on japan is because the United states have given Japan multiple times to surrender and they refused each offer. So since President Truman believed that using the bombs would help end the war sooner. One benefit of bombing Japan would mean that there would be fewer deaths because if they were to continue to fight it out many more lives would have been lost. So since President Truman believed that this would make Japan surrender easier the first bomb was dropped over Hiroshima and then the second one was dropped over Nagasaki. Many people beloved that the bomb should not have been used on Japan and one reason why was because it did take the lives of many innocent people.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

First off, not disagree with the decisions of the president to drop atomic bombs in Nagasaki, Hiroshima. The reason why I disagree with the atomic weapons that were drawn in japan is because there were thousand of people who were killed, innocent peoples who died in that bomb drops. there were military men who died, but at the same time is was acceptable for united states to fight, and win the war. United states were discomforted the lost thousand of people, including military, 48,000 people from the united states, military, and innocent peoples. It was grave that the united states had thousands of life that are why they proposed the attack besides japan.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

“A world without nuclear war would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us”. These words were spoken by Margaret Thatcher who supported the thought of using atomic warfare, and she wasn’t alone in this idea. President Harry S. Tuman also believed that during WWII, the use of the newly constructed atomic bombs were a crucial move that the U.S. military needed to make. The events that occured on April 6, 1945 changed the course of the war, and the invention of “Fat Man” and “Little Boy” made nuclear warfare possible for future conflicts. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a military necessity during World War II.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

The first reason they should have not uses atomic bombs is because the Japanese did not have enough time to look for an opportunity to surrender. According to Ralph A. Bard, that was the United States undersecretary of the Navy during World war II in June 27 1945, the Japanese were looking for a reason to surrender, so before the bomb is actually used, “Japan should have some preliminary warning... the Japanese government may be searching for some opportunity which...use a medium of surrender”( Document 2). In this quote, he says that the Japanese should have more time or warning before dropping the bomb because he feels that this would give them the perfect opportunity they are looking for to surrender and end the war. He also says that the United States is a “great humanitarian nation” with a “fair play attitude.”

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an Atomic bomb called the Little Boy on Hiroshima in Japan. A few days later the united states dropped another atomic bomb called the Fat man on the city of Nagasaki. The dropping of an atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the wars quickly, as Japan saw the devastating effects it had on their people and country. The decision to drop the bomb was a very hard one to agree on but changed lives for others. There are many pros and cons of the atomic bombs.

Read More
1345 Words | 6 Pages

Using nuclear weapons did less damage than what would have happen if an evasion took place. Using those types of weapons did save many allied soldiers and it has deterred people war because they look back in history and remember that event that took place in japan and realize that the weapons did not grow weaker from that area but have only gotten stronger and more powerful with each growing day. That is why nuclear warfare deters countries from war or invasions. It also gives and advantage to them if war was to break out like the United States and Japan. Instead of the invasion the U.S used

Read More
315 Words | 2 Pages

The Atomic Bomb was only supposed to be used for defense only. In August 1945, President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. I think Enola Gay shouldn’t have dropped the Atomic Bomb. I’m going to tell you why.

Read More
1088 Words | 5 Pages

Before the sights of the 9/11 attacks, the Jonestown massacre was the largest loss of U.S. civilian lives through a non-natural disaster. The mastermind and leader of this, Jim Jones, was a man born in rural Indiana on May 31, 1931. In Jones early 20s, he began to work as a Christian minister in Indianapolis. He was a self-oriented minister that just worked in small churches or smaller churches. Instead of moving from church to church, Jones wanted to settle down and run his own church.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

For many decades it has been the president who is given the power to act solely on what he believes is best for our national interest when responding to a nuclear attack. Bruce Blair, in a dialogue about the president’s authority to launch a nuclear strike, clearly states that the system is meant to be quick and precise for time constraints. It is critical for there to be a system that works quickly. When detecting a nuclear attack heading towards the U.S., it is only a matter of minutes before impact. Consider how fast everything must happen in order for a quick reaction.

Read More
1118 Words | 5 Pages

Another reason why we should have not used the bomb was because it was very immoral for America to drop the atomic bombs. The dropping of Little Boy and Fat Man resulted in many people to die in a very horrible manner. America could of have always taken a different approach when it came to defeating Japan because dropping the atomic bombs was a horrible decision that should have never

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

In the Second World War, a new class of weapons were deployed, nuclear weapons. The atom bombs dropped on Nagasaki and on Hiroshima was a first for war. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a military necessity because war in the Pacific had to end, and to stop the Soviet Union from fighting Japan. World War II in the Pacific had to end. The war had cost too many casualties, and destroyed peace.

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

Military grade weapons are made for one reason and one reason only—to kill human beings. There is no reason for ordinary people to have access to this type of weaponry, especially semi-automatic rifles. More weapons, especially more semi-automatic weapons, does not mean less crime; semi-automatic weapons are not convenient for personal protection, and banning these weapons could help lower the number of mass shootings that occur in this country today. In 2016 alone, approximately 39,000 Americans were killed by guns, most of these deaths were caused by semi-automatic weapons (Lopez).

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been a controversial topic since the events occurred in August of 1945. There were many reasons why the United States made the decision to use the atomic bomb to end the war with Japan. While there were several other options the United States could have opted for, President Truman and his committee chose the plan that would save as many American lives as possible. The driving factor that led to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the race of discovery of harnessing the great power that is the atomic bomb, which included the United States and Great Britain against Germany.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Regarding The Use Of Nuclear Weapons In War

Related Topics

Open Document