Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note of role of robespierre
Short note of role of robespierre
Analysis on robespierre and terror
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short note of role of robespierre
The Reign of Terror was led by Maximilien Robespierre, he violently suppressed counter-revolutionary forces within and outside the country. Did the French government have good reason to conduct a violent campaign to uphold the ideals of the French Revolution? The Reign of Terror was justified because of three reasons: the revolutionary
The Reign of Terror did not support the ideals of the revolution. Unfortunately for French citizens, they were not able to elect tribunal members. The tribunal members, who have absolute power were “appointed by the National Convention” (Document E). French people were rejected in their own country, which is proven by the statement that “conspirators are, in its eyes, only strangers”(Document G). The original ideals were made to protect the people of France but instead they were killing
While in reality, it was used by Robespierre as a way to build upon and strengthen his power. Instead of working on the democratic ideals of liberty and equality that he spoke of in public, Robespierre used the Terror to execute or imprison thousands of people who he viewed as a threat. “Robespierre's Justification Source B: Maximilien Robespierre, speech to the National Convention, “On the Moral and Political Principles of Domestic Policy” After Napoleon lost the Battle of Waterloo, he was exiled from France. So now with France without a leader, the Congress of Vienna is seeking to put a king back in power in France, and resume the
The Reign of Terror in France was not justified. This claim can be supported by looking at three areas: external threat, the internal threat, and the methods. The external threat was not enough to justify the Reign of Terror. One example of this is that “churches are soon closed by revolutionary government” which is wrong, because people should be able to choose what they believe in (Document A). Another example is that the “Government denies legal counsel to accused enemies of the revolution” (Document A).
Birthed from a multitude of causes including the execution of the king, the momentum and arbitrariness of the Revolution, and fear of counter-revolution, Terror itself, became synonymous with the Revolution. Questioning of the Terror thus was equivalent to questioning the Revolution- a crime which carried life sanctions. The Reign of Terror’s pervasive and tyrannic movement infiltrated the nation and claimed over 50,000 lives of conceived counter-revolutionaries, inclusive of Source B’s orator, Antoine Barnavare. Jean Paul-Marat’s emotive speech reinstates the New Order “crush us in the name of justice, they load us with irons in the name of liberty”, perpetuating the development of the Revolution from moral to tyrannical. With the guidance of both Source A and Source B, the first having addressed feudal and monarchical injustices’ committed against the people, and the second- the people's retaliation, to growing extremes, the development of the French Revolution can be traced efficaciously.
Maximillien Robespierre played a major role during the Reign of Terror. He was a lawyer and the leader of the Jacobins, which was a profound political group. In 1793, Robespierre joined the 12-Member Committee of Public Safety known as the National Convention. However, he considered himself to be the leader, and soon began accepting the methods which distorted the people of the Revolution. Maximillien also played an important role in the abolition of slavery, but he was eventually executed through his own
How revolutionary was the French Revolution? Did the Revolution simply replace the old ruling elite with a new bourgeois one? What were the major effects on different groups of people, including nobles, priests, peasants, urban workers, slaves, and women? This essay will address the French Revolution and the degree to which it can be aptly described as “revolutionary.” How revolutionary was the French Revolution? Was the storming of the Bastille, the destruction of feudalism, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of a fundamental and radical and revolutionary nature, or, alternatively, simply a series of historical events that results in the supplanting of one authoritarian regime for another and at great cost in
With all of this fear, how could Maximilien Robespierre possibly have a downfall? As the last two months of the terror came, the tyrant started to blame himself for the thousands of deaths. He passed the Law of the Twenty Second Prairial, which stated that all rights of the accused victim were washed away, making the executions go even faster (Linton). After the Committee of Public Safety passed this, Robespierre never attended another meeting. In his last few weeks, he rarely left his assigned room.
Sunday worship, Christmas, and Easter were abolished…in Auxerre.” (Map created from various sources, Document C). The Reign of Terror was not justified because they enforced laws that made people do things that they didn’t want to do, which means that they don’t value liberty. Robespierre ultimately ruined the chances of peace, killing anyone who got in his way to stay in
Following the Reign of Terror, France was ruled by a corrupt five-man governing body called the Directory, which was overthrown by Napoleon Bonaparte through a coup d’état. Napoleon, a military general, rose to power through a series of military conquests and eventually became the First Consul of the French Republic. The French people viewed Napoleon favorably, as his military and political genius would likely lead to the creation of a prosperous and united France. Moreover, they believed that he would uphold the ideas they had fought for during the French Revolution: liberty, equality, and fraternity. While Napoleon stabilized and united French society by supporting the liberty of his people and ensuring equality of opportunity in education
The Intellectual movement known as the Enlightenment occupies an important position in the growth of Western civilization. How it totally affected society, especially French society is a subject of debate, from the beginning of the Revolution to today. In fact, two schools of interpretation are involved. The first school is the conservative school, Edmund Burke is the best example.
Opinion Article #1 Maximilen Robespierre was one of the most practical and capable leaders I witnessed aiding to the revolution. Because he witnessed the unruly hand of King Louis XVI from my point of view as a lowly 3rd estate citizen with no power and hope, he uncovered the flaws of a monarchy system. To overcome nobility Robespierre, myself, and other members of the lower social classes joined groups and cults to end the reign against the French king. In 1792, King Louis XVI was finally executed and stripped of his title. Monarchy had come to an end in France with the death of the king, however Robespierre still noticed many rebellions despite the history of King Louis XVI’s rule.
The French Revolution The White Terror was a period during the French Revolution, in 1795, when a wave of violent attacks swept across most of France. The victims of this violence were people identified as being associated with the Reign of Terror. The violence was perpetrated primarily by those whose relatives or associates that had been victims of the Great Terror, or whose lives and livelihoods had been threatened by the government and its supporters before the terror attacks. The Great Terror had been largely organized and political programed.
This enormous massacre of people went against Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, all of which the national assembly declared were every man 's right. Much of the killing can be blamed on Robespierre and King Louis XVI. Although it was mostly a failure, some achievements can be seen through the Revolution. The French Revolution helped the French people become a more equal and socialist state. This showed Europe that the French were capable of revolting and they were not afraid to stand up for what they believed.
Many see the terror as the means to an end for France to live on and defeat its foreign enemy. The level of control and the swift reaction against agents within France were tools that allowed them to turn the tide of the war. A notable aspect of the Terror was that the members of the Committee of Public Safety, with the exception of Robespierre, travelled to different parts of France and enforced both the positive and negative aspects of the Terror. It was through these visits that many of the Jacobin’s social welfare ideals were initiated. Many defenders of the Terror within the context of the revolution point to these accounts as evidence of the good intentions behind the