Asians are good at math, Irish are alcoholics, African Americans are athletic, and Caucasians are privileged. These are just some of the well known stereotypes that are frequently used for humor. Stereotypes are certainly not always true and are often criticized for generalizing large groups of people, but they coincide meticulously with comedy because they can resonate with an audience instantly and receive a humorous reaction. In this essay, I will respond to the texts All in in the Family, Chappelle’s Show, and Family Guy by discussing the satire of bigotry and the importance of context when telling a controversial joke.
First, I’d like to discuss the differences between bigotry and the satire of bigotry. I think that it is the satire of
…show more content…
I believe that any controversial or offensive topic is acceptable if it is presented using humor, but in order for the joke to work it must use the appropriate context. For example, Chappelle’s Show staring comedian Dave Chappelle uses stereotypes to positively reveal the social injustices that occur in American society. The show ridicules racism by exaggerating racial stereotypes to demonstrate how nonsensical they truly are. By satirizing the stereotypes and assumptions that people make about different races, Chappelle's Show attempts to encourage its audience to question both the reliability and the validity of such stereotypes. Family Guy uses a similar technique when crafting their humor. The show puts a mirror in front of our society and has us look into it. By playing back to us our own conceptions of race the show mocks discrimination and stereotypes, but in no way does it condone either. Family Guy attempts to shine a comical spotlight on our flaws, anxieties, and prejudices. By making them the cause of laughter, the show aspires to unmask just how foolish they are. There is nothing funny about labeling large groups of people based on their race, ethnicity, or beliefs but in my opinion with the correct context you can make any controversial topic