Scientific Revolution Vs Industrial Revolution

976 Words4 Pages

Referring to the many historical altercations in personal beliefs and thoughts, the Scientific Revolution lasted for a great deal of time. Many subjects developed new ideas like physics, medicine, biology, astronomy, and chemistry, which came about and laid the foundations for modern science. During this time scientists began to apply what is now known as the scientific method, whereby they use observation, experimentation, and special tools to discover the laws of nature (Bradford). Many people supporting the church pushed away intellectual thinking and were ignorant of science because it was intimidating. Although, as Johannes Kepler stated, “I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses.” He wanted the threatened …show more content…

There was a very medieval mindset and people saw the world in a highly structured way, which corresponded directly to social hierarchy. The scientific revolution was essential to the subsequent Industrial Revolution in the sense that there was an open minded examination of nature. Many people began to actually think beyond the restrictions of the Catholic Church. Once people were free to do their own thinking, advances began increasing rapidly. Steam power led to Industrialization, which led to a factory system and mass production. Therefore, the result of the scientific revolution was the industrial revolution which clearly stimulated European economy in a very great way. This led to essential world domination by the European nations in 1900. In Europe, specific key events that allowed and encouraged the scientific revolution were the Renaissance and the Enlightenment (Brians). They both celebrated man's belief in humanity and fostered tolerance for free thinking. They also subordinated theological reasoning for humanistic reasoning