ipl-logo

Should Australia Invest In Nuclear Energy Essay

666 Words3 Pages

Should Australia Invest In Nuclear Energy?

Is nuclear energy really important? What is nuclear energy? Nuclear energy is the energy released by a nuclear reaction (fission, fusion) in significant amounts. In nuclear energy, the water is turned into steam, which then drives turbine generators to produce electricity. This can be impregnable! Some of the major disadvantages include radiations, the supply of uranium/plutonium, the radioactive waste that would be produced, the cost, and accidents along with the consequences that can occur in nuclear reactors. I strongly believe that it is an atrocious idea to have Australia invest in nuclear energy.

First of all, supporting my argument, one of the major disadvantages are the accidents and consequences. Would you like to live in a country where these points could have the biggest impacts on your families or your lives? Accidents are never guaranteed. They don't come planned and it may as well take a second for everything to come to an end. Unfortunately, this has happened in Japan and US. Both of these countries suffered one of its worst …show more content…

Nuclear expositions produce radiations and the radiations can harm the cells of our body which can lead to a severe sickness or even kill us humans. Radiation is the emission of energy as electromagnetic waves which cause ionization. Radiation sickness is caused by exposure to a high dose of radiation. When these particles come into contact with organic material, they will damage them, causing burns and cancer. Exposure to radiation makes our bodies produce fewer blood clotting agents, called blood platelets, increasing our risk of internal bleeding. Experts believe that approximately 50% of humans exposed to 450 rems will die, and 800 rems will kill virtually anyone. Death is inevitable and will occur from between two days to a couple of weeks and these radiations can take years to

Show More
Related
688 Words | 3 Pages

Although there were many short-term effects of the war, there were many long-term effects as well. The most significant long-term effect is cancer. The common types of cancer caused by radiation exposure are thyroid cancer and leukemia. Even after twenty years, children of those exposed to radiation were born with birth defects. People also suffered from keloids, scars that swelled after healing, and cataracts, the condition of foggy eyes.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

As radiation dose increases, the cancer risk increases in a fairly predictable manner.” (Karam, 2005). Some specific isotopes pose a health risk. The biological processes tend to concentrate certain chemicals in certain organs. A Nuclear explosion would complicate issues not only due to the explosion, but the wounds caused and later fallout issues.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear Energy IS Australia’s Future Introduction: I wholeheartedly believe that Nuclear Energy will play an inevitably central role as a reliable energy source in Australia’s future. Australia must invest in Nuclear energy because coal and oil are becoming scarce, requires less fuel and is eco-friendly. Australia is blessed with the world’s largest known uranium resources (a bountiful 38% according to Professor Mary O’Kane NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer). ANSTO (Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation) reports: ‘No country of Australia’s economic size or larger is without nuclear power’.

Read More
1492 Words | 6 Pages

The first advantage of using nuclear power to produce our electricity is that it costs only 1.92 cents per kilowatt hour to produce electricity from nuclear power. Furthermore, nuclear power is a more efficient source of energy than other sources such as coal or natural gas (Figure 5). The two biggest advantages in terms of the wellbeing of planet earth of using nuclear power are that it creates very little to no greenhouse gases, such as CO2, and also it does not use our non-renewable resources. A typical nuclear reactor utilizes uranium-235 as its source of energy, but unfortunately, uranium-235 only makes up 0.72% of all of the uranium on earth. With that being said, the fact that nuclear power does not use un-renewable resources might be being questioned at the moment, but the truth is that even though uranium-235 is a non-renewable resource, a new form of reactor called a breeder reactor, makes this a harmless process in regard to our valuable resources.

Read More
395 Words | 2 Pages

On September 11, 2001, 19 terrorists associated with the Islamic group al-Qaeda hijacked four airplanes and carried out attacks against the United States. The planes targeted major military and economic centers including The World Trade Center in New York City, and the Pentagon, a fourth plane was brought down in a field in Pennsylvania, but many believe this was intended to hit The White House or congressional building. Often referred to 9/11, the attacks resulted in many deaths and millions of dollars’ worth of destruction, causing major U.S. initiatives to combat terrorism and defining the presidency of George W. Bush.9/11 caused an economic downwards spiral resulting in a stock market slump and later contributed to a recession. The attacks

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Despite the negative publicity of incidents such as the reactor meltdown at Three Mile Island and the Chernobyl disaster, nuclear power remains a viable source of energy. Nuclear power produces large amounts of energy without damaging the environment with large amounts of carbon dioxide. In addition, nuclear power is more economical than traditional energy sources. Not only does it cost less to produce, it benefits the economy by creating new employment positions. Finally, nuclear energy results in fewer deaths each year than traditional fossil fuel sources.

Read More
2144 Words | 9 Pages

Despite the dangers of radiation and meltdowns, nuclear reactors continue to advance and improve the safety and quality of the reactors. Fusion reactors are currently under construction and will be ready to use in several years. As a developed country, Australia should participate in the development of future technology that is nuclear

Read More
1226 Words | 5 Pages

You could also get it in your mouth or by breathing it in and get radiation poisoning. Also you could get

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. already has a well- placed foothold on nuclear energy. I think the U.S. should switch to nuclear energy because it would have lower operating costs, it would be more reliable, and it is better than fossil fuel. In fact, there are ninety-nine operating nuclear reactors and more are planning to be built due to its cheap cost. Nuclear energy produces more energy, but at a less cost.

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

A major reason why Nuclear Power Plants are non-operational in Australia is because of the disadvantages which come with it. As Lucas Heights closed, Australia has been witnessed to safer energy, environment although, our major electricity source is also a non-renewable source which means coal will eventually as well. Though Australia does not need a nuclear power plant at this time, it is something that Australian citizens and government may have to take a liking to. If you take reference to Appendix A, the power plant has developed many different features which can help this new age energy devices generate enough electricity without effecting the citizen and the environment around it. According to Appendix A, the developed nuclear power plant contains a

Read More
996 Words | 4 Pages

Elementary Secondary Education Act: Federal Leadership or Federal Interference? The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) is an act of federal leadership. I claim that the ESEA is a form of federal leadership. The information in President Lyndon B. Johnson’s (LBJ) speech of April 11, 1965, Ann McColl’s writing of April 2005, called “Tough Call: Is No Child Left Behind Constitutional?”, and Lydia Saad’s “The Federal Government’s Role in Education,” of September 8, 2010 they all give information that support the ESEA is federal leadership and not federal interference.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

Scientist say that there are cancer risks to any type of exposure to radiation and each year a human is exposed to 620 millirem, half of that is from man made materials and the other half comes from natural sources but, doctors disagree with scientist. Doctors do know that 620 millirems are exposed to a person annually but they don't believe that it is a risk of cancer because some radiation exposure does not have risks for cancer(National Cancer Institute). There are two categories of health effects that radiation can cause, chronic exposure and acute effect. Chronic exposure is being exposed to radiation over a long period of time. Acute effect is when large parts of the body is exposed to a large amount of radiation.

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

I am for nuclear power because of the following reasons. It is relatively cheap, it is a base load energy, low pollution, you can use thorium, its sustainably, and it has high energy density. There are many difficulties too such as the mining destroys the land, it makes a lot of waste, there is a chance of a meltdown, and the cost a lot to start. Nuclear power has relatively low cost. It may cost a lot to start, but it makes your money back quickly because of the amount energy it produces.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

The potential is limitless, and it should be realized as they have low greenhouse gas emissions, are efficient, powerful, cheap and reliable. Positives outweigh the negatives, and we should keep on using nuclear energy. Firstly, nuclear power generation has low greenhouse gas emissions, which make it good for the environment. The actual fission

Read More

More about Should Australia Invest In Nuclear Energy Essay

Related Topics

Open Document