Should public schools allow teachers to teach “the theory of” evolution? That was the debate sixty years ago; today’s debate is should alternative’s theories to evolution be taught in public schools, particularly the human species? Parents, teachers, principals, and school boards alike that come from religious sectors say that they want alternative theories to evolution, such as the alternative theory of Intelligent Design. “Intelligent design (ID) is the idea that life is so complex it could only have been created by an intelligent being” (Clemmitt, 2005, p. 637). To address the issue, one needs to know both intelligent design and evolution. Evolution is the theory that all species derived from one shared ancestor. For instance, the “theory” that the human species evolved from apes. Knowing both theories, should public schools solely teach evolution or add additional creation theories? …show more content…
They do not see evolution as fact though it is accepted as fact by most of the scientific community. They say that there are holes in evolution because it doesn’t explain all aspects of the origin of human life. Evolution doesn’t give the children any chance to make their own decision on what they want to believe in (Clemmitt, 2005, p. 637). Supporters argue that everything you watch or read always goes back to evolution. It is pushing evolution on society (“Intelligent Design vs Evolution,” n.d.). Evolution is the “concrete of biology” (Clemmitt, 2005, p. 339). “Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit so that we can get intelligent design, which really means the reality of God before the academic world and into the schools” (Clemmitt, 2005, p.