ipl-logo

Smokers Have Rights Essay

449 Words2 Pages

Smokers Have Rights HEADLINE: The war on drugs has dramatically decreased the number of drugs produced and taken in the United States! Nobody smokes marijuana anymore, and cocaine is completely out of the picture! If any of those statements were true, placing a ban on smoking in public would make sense. People still smoke marijuana, people still do cocaine, and people will continue smoking cigarettes, even if it is made illegal. Tobacco products have an extremely high tax, therefore helping out the government. Smokers are choosing to pay the extremely outrageous and unfair taxes (In defense of smokers). Why would the government want to take away taxes, and in turn take away money from the government? In fact, taxes on tobacco products brought in nearly fifteen and a half million dollars to the government in 2010 (May, C.). Placing a ban on public smoking would only decrease the number of cigarettes purchased, and thereby decrease government revenue. It is just as simple for a public area to better ventilate a designated area of the facility as it is to ban smoking. Smoking bans have actually decreased the amount of business to bars, clubs, and restaurants. Smokers would rather stay home or go to friends homes who allow smoking, rather than go out and spend their money on businesses who discourage …show more content…

Smokers know the harm they are bringing to their bodies and take full responsibility for the effects on their health. Smoking, for many, is used as a calmer, stress reliever, and even used to help with anxiety. Many people use tobacco products as a way to relax themselves. The chemicals given off from the nicotine can serve to relax a person. The chemicals given off have been proven to soothe ones pain and even strengthen positive emotions (Smoking in public). Smokers are greatly affected by the ban, and feel that it is their personal right to choose whether they should smoke or

Show More
Related
768 Words | 4 Pages

Taxes will also reduce producer revenue so that might face opposition as article mentions that in 2012 when government increased the tax by 1$ the tobacco interests spent 47.7 million dollars in opposition or unemployment will increase. As most of cigarets employers are manufacturing workers who have low skills which may not have skills to find another job. Government in need of votes and more likely would not give theirs votes to the government which increase price on cigarettes by putting tax on cigarettes. There is much less advantages then disadvantages. Most important advantage is that government will have higher revenue which they could invest into merit goods such as education or health.

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

This is particularly true in the UK, Canada, and Australia, where such legislation has taken effect (Dennis). Those who support that model are certainly not wrong – without smoking, the majority of people would benefit in terms of their health and well being. But we do no ban things because they are unhealthy. We let the citizens decide, using their free will and their choices offered to them by the free market, as should be the case in any democratic

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

There are many reasons why smoking should be outlawed in the United States. Cigarette smoking should be outlawed because of the negative effects of health on smokers, negative effects on non smokers, chemicals in cigarettes, and the influence it has on our youth. Cigarette

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Using tobacco products in public, even in designated smoking areas, causes damage to those around the consumer. The smoke from the tobacco products travels through the air, making it capable of doing damage to all those around them. Smoke is able to travel a great distance, reaching far beyond the designated smoking areas. If the government had the authority to ban the use of tobacco in all public places, less children from nonsmoking homes would be suffering from secondhand smoke, also known as passive smoke. The government should be able to police what is allowed in public areas; smoking in public causes damage to Americans that otherwise would not have been

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Smokers should not be discriminated, although Smokers choose to smoke at their own risk. It is the non-smokers who feel they have no rights. The percent of smokers who said they would quit smoking unfortunately did not. Five years late 70% of those smokers are still smoking. Smokers should quit if the health insurance is raised for smokers.

Read More
1674 Words | 7 Pages

Using tobacco products can cause fatal consequences in the long run, and taking a heavy toll on their families’ well-being. Cigarettes and tobacco products should be outlawed. Smoking and tobacco products generate billions of U.S. dollars in tax revenue. In fact, a whopping $27 billion in revenue was predicted for 2017 (U.S. Congressional Budget Report, 2016). This money is extremely useful to government agencies and helps keep the economic wheel of the country running smoothly.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Smoking has also been banned at the city parks, farms, city beaches, playgrounds and other public places. This will help a great deal because people will be living healthily and the number of individuals getting cancer and asthma will go

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

Based on the article "Smoking Ban Pros and Cons" it states that "This may have a natural effect of lowering healthcare costs in each community because there could be less overall smoking going on." In other words this shows that if there is a smoking ban and people stop smoking the health care won't be as expensive because there are not going to be as much smokers. However, if there is a lot of smokers the health care will costs more. Furthermore, in the article "Smoke-Free Policies Improve Health" it states that "Studies have shown that smokefree laws that prohibit smoking in public places like bars and restaurants help improve the health of workers and the general population. Some of these improvements in health outcomes, such as reductions in hospital admissions for heart attacks, begin to be realized shortly after the laws take effect.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Personally, I believe that ASU is doing all of that not because of the second hand smoking but because they want to save money out of facilities and maintenance, and diminish the danger of fires on campus. Tobacco use on campus consumes profitable staff time getting cigarette butts, cleaning ashtrays, and building designated smoking areas around the campuses is considered a waste of money. ASU also believe that foolish smokers begin fires by dropping cigarettes in planting ranges and waste containers. Going completely tobacco free campus does not just move the issue, it actually eliminates it and it eliminated smokers’ rights to smoke

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

I had earlier explained about how a ban is simply not a strong enough incentive for smokers to quit. There is always a possibility of them identifying other methods to continue smoking. It is true for one to ask can’t they not substitute tobacco for something else? As earlier pointed out, I am treating smoking as an essential good only on the basis that it is addictive which is very similar to the idea of salt being treated as necessary good which cannot be substituted. To conclude this reason, a policy maker will have to do more than just a ban on smoking as I had earlier stated that a simple ban will not have much impact.

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

Profit and money are the driving factors behind so many things, that people are not very motivated to eradicate something that earns them billions of dollars. Yes, legislation such as those to reduce secondhand smoke positively affect health outcomes, but I feel it is not enough. Tobacco is a legal substance despite its known negative, sometimes fatal repercussions. There is a plethora of research regarding the deadly and harmful effects of smoking and cigarette use, yet it is a legal substance used by millions. I think that the government needs to forget the profit aspect and focus on its citizens health.

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

There is grey disgusting cancerous smoke through the air you and your loved ones breathe. I believe that smoking cigarettes in public places should be illegal for many reasons such as the health and safety dangers of others and even myself. Firstly those who believe that smoking should be banned say that cigarettes can affect smokers deeply in the long run. “Over 50,000 studies of the health effects of tobacco in dozens of countries have detailed its dangers.

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

In fact, those who smoke have their life span shortened by about approximately. However, the government must ban tobacco smoking in order to prevent smokers from lethal diseases, protect nonsmokers as well as saving the environment. The most obvious reason as to why tobacco should be

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Nicotine is the addictive ingrediant that makes people addicted to the thought of continue smoking but there is also 40 other chemicals that are known for causing dangerous health issues. If you were to look up cigarette ingrediants you can see that there are many of chemicals that are very toxic for the body that people digest as they light one. They are slowly killing themselves inside out. Cancer, lung diease, and diabetes are some of the health issues that lead to death, amputees, etc. over time.

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

Smoking has become a social habit nowadays. When people around are smoking, the person practically feel like he/she should be doing the same. And this is increasing day by day in our country. Smoking tribulates almost every organ of the body. It is the leading cause of more than 443,00 deaths each year.

Read More

More about Smokers Have Rights Essay

Related Topics

Open Document