ipl-logo

Supreme Court Pros And Cons

1328 Words6 Pages

Allisha Beggs
PS110
Gordon Vurusic
April 16, 2018
The Supreme Court In 1788, the United States first established the Judicial, Executive and Legislative Branches of the Federal government in the Constitution, Article II specifically outlines the powers of the Court. “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the rise of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority.” (US const. art. II, sec. 2). The third article seems to be the least detailed leaving it open for interpretation, the establishers of the Constitution were most likely taking this fact into consideration because they could not foresee the future of America, how much we would grow and that we could come this far. By leaving the third article open …show more content…

The Republicans were asking questions like “whether she has the kind of deeply conservative judicial philosophy the president promised” ("Republican Party Could Derail Supreme Court Nominee Harriet Miers."). This proves branch of government that is supposed to be politically independent, is ultimately formed by the vision of president and Senators that are in office at the time, with a little influence from the public. It’s shocking to think that strong groups can force nominees to resign from elections. But Miers case proves that the public has the ability to change the president's initial decision regarding justices. Bush had initially nominated her for Supreme Court justice, but after the backlash they both received from the Republican Party, she quickly resigned. The court seems to take the majority of the populations opinions and safety into consideration on most of their decisions. Taking a closer look at a few major cases it becomes clear. In Brown v. The Board of Education, the court's decision was “consistent with the social mores of the nation as a whole” (Joondeph, 2004), the southern

Open Document