ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

1429 Words6 Pages

It is no doubt that animal experimentation has given rise to numerous advancements in medical treatments and medicines resulting in saving of human lives. People, scientists, and biologists are divided on the issue of animal research making them the perfect audience for this report (Saraf & Kumaraswamy, 2013). Despite the united agreement that animal experimentation saves lives, people are increasingly questioning if this form of testing is necessary or ethical. Owing to this, there is a need to adopt a type of animal experimentation, which upholds human continuity, and at the same time enforce strict regulations to regulate people who engage in this practice.
Animal experimentations represent a foundation of biomedical sciences. They do not …show more content…

Animals put under experiments endure traumatic and avoidable tests. Hajar (2011) suggests that a number of animal experiments are wasteful, harsh, and ridiculous. This researcher states that in one experiment pregnant rabbits were given cocaine with the aim of studying the effects of drug use on their offspring. In another research, cats were shot in the skull to demonstrate that this kind of wound affects breathing (Saraf & Kumaraswamy, 2013). The nature of animal experimentation has hardly changed over the last few decades implying that millions of animals continue to anguish in avoidable tests annually (Saraf & Kumaraswamy, 2013). Animal experimentation should be stopped for perpetuating cruel mistreatments of animals. Continuation of the practice contravenes leads to ethical mistreatments of …show more content…

The research is xenotransplantation, which refers to the transplantation of body organs from an animal into a human. Saraf & Kumaraswamy (2013) suggest that preclinical animal trials employing transgenic pig organs into baboons are being done at the Western Ontario University, Canada. Such experiments will lead to the death of both animals and human beings. Saraf & Kumaraswamy (2013) point out that no human beneficiary of an animal organ has ever lived because human bodies reject animal. Even if it becomes successful, xenotransplantation will pose a threat to human life because it presents a risk that unknown pathogens like virus may be passed from an animal to humans (Saraf & Kumaraswamy, 2013). Similarly, killing an animal to supply humans with organs is not only cruel to animals but also unethical. Therefore, animal experimentation should be stopped because it may lead to the death of both animals and human

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

Over 61,000 dogs suffer in U.S laboratories every year. More than 21,000 cats are forced to endure painful experiments in U.S laboratories anually. Animals have been used repeatedly for scientific research throughout history. However, not all animal studies have been successful when humans were involved. Animal testing torments many innocent creatures for unreliable and costly research that is not necessary.

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

Scientist have been overstepping boundaries in many parts of the scientific world, one of these being animal testing. Animal testing is when scientist test on animals and inject them or mutate their genes for a human gain, typically with no gain for the animal. The National Library of Medicine posted an article on the flaws and harms of animal experimentation, these flaws can be put in these, “...three major conditions undermine this confidence and explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, fails to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics.” The first condition being the influence of laboratory procedures and environments on experimental results. The conditions in these experiments show that, “animals in laboratories are involuntarily placed in artificial environments, usually in windowless rooms, for the duration of their lives.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Studies show that with all of the animal experimentation that has been done, most of them were inhumane, unreliable and had violated the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. This act ensures that animal care for research is a main priority. It is also required to have appropriate veterinary care, housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. For some, animal experimentation is “supposed” to help human beings use certain products for their own benefit. What people do not realize is that these animals have rights and that their rights are being more than violated.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

I think that scientist and psychologist shouldn’t be able to do unnecessary experiments on animals. The first reason that I think they shouldn’t is because most of the time these animals don’t survive these procedures. It isn’t right to instantly end an animal’s life, as well as its wrong to end a human’s life. On top of these innocent killings us human’s show little to no remorse. Most people believe that animals don’t suffer or feel pain but according to Victoria Braithwaite even fish feel pain.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
1263 Words | 6 Pages

The reason the UK is demanding scientists in reduction of animal experimentation is because so many animals are used in the experiments and there are no positive results. In Mckie’s article, Penny Hawkins of the RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) states, “Animals have suffered unnecessarily and patients have been let down because public money has been wasted on worthless research”

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

The ethics debate surrounding medical research that utilizes animal testing is a divisive topic, which is not mediated by the current perception of animal testing. The idea that animals are mistreated and neglected in laboratory facilities is an antiquated perception which is not reflective of the current, highly regulated practice in modern medical research. Medical research on animals should not be forbidden by law because it is already highly regulated for the protection of animals, there are currently no adequate alternatives, and the practice has been essential to the development of numerous life-saving treatments. Medical research on animals is a highly regulated practice. The Animal Welfare Act not only sets guidelines on how animals can be procured, but also their housing conditions, and stipulates regular veterinary examinations for all test subjects (USDA).

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

The experimentation of animals needs to be illegal from a humanitarian standpoint, because of the testing methods that exists today, and the legal ramifications of todays society.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

“According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means.” (Author unknown, procon.org, last updated on 11/2/2017) This shows that animals that are tested on are treated badly and even killed for experiments. A 2009 survey shows that rats and mice who underwent painful procedures, such as burn experiments, spinal surgeries, and skull surgeries were only provided with pain relief after the procedure 20% of the time. This proves that animals are treated worse than humans because they are not always given pain medication.

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

The whole thing is evil.” One way that the government could curb animal experimentation would be to encourage the use of alternative research

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Some people argue that an animal should have as much right as a human being to live out a full life. Seeking further knowledge for man-kind is great, but treating animals merely as tools for further knowledge is definitely wrong. On the other hand, others are arguing that animal experimentation must continue because of the enormous scientific resource that animal. Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. The balance between animal rights and their use in biomedical research is a subtle problem with a huge social

Read More
1101 Words | 5 Pages

In discussions of animal rights, one controversial issue has been animal experimentation. On the one hand, skeptics argue that animal experimentation is unnecessary and cruel as there are other “alternatives”. On the other hand, advocates contend that animal experimentation is essential to medical progress. My own view is that animal experimentation is needed in order to improve human health. Animals and humans have similarities and differences that benefit both humans and animals alike in medical terms.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Every year, millions of animals were suffering or killed due to scientific research. Some animal rights groups suggest that we should ban animal experiments because use animals for experimentation is cruel and animals should have the same right of living as human beings. A report from U.S. Department of Agriculture shows that more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. There are some other people believe that the death of animals will help and save millions of human lives. Personally I believe that the experimentation on animals for scientific and medical should not be stopped.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

Related Topics

Open Document