The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Scientists are using various animals to do experiments on medical, beauty and military uses. In their point of views, animals are not a living organism, they are just the living tools which are treated inhumanely for the sake of humans’ safety. There are many ethical disputes in animal testing, not only unnecessary, unscientific, immoral, but also quite cruel. Animal testing is wrong and downright mean. Why should animals be experimented on and made to suffer to protect human beings? Do you know what animal testing is, what condition the animals live in, and what some alternatives to testing animals are? Animal testing must be eliminated. The definition of animals testing, which can separate as human and non-human animal experiments, is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. Any creature can display partly human characteristics, like emotions, to be considered a human is called non-human animals. For example, chimpanzee is one of the non-human animals, they have the similar organ systems and body processes as human. So, scientists will inject all kinds of virus and try all the medicals to find out the antidotes for human by ignore …show more content…
Some people argue that an animal should have as much right as a human being to live out a full life. Seeking further knowledge for man-kind is great, but treating animals merely as tools for further knowledge is definitely wrong. On the other hand, others are arguing that animal experimentation must continue because of the enormous scientific resource that animal. Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. The balance between animal rights and their use in biomedical research is a subtle problem with a huge social