ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1877 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: History of animal testing essay

Recently, a chilling video showing a dog’s dismembered head attached by machine bombards my mind. It was a revolutionary experimental outcome published in 1941 by soviet scientists who had successfully invented a heart-lungs device, ‘Auto-ejector’, which he used to reanimate the severed head of a dog. The device worked as a blood circulation system which circulates the blood around the head with two mechanically operated diaphragm pumps to restore basic motor function of the dog’s head and keep it alive. Within the video, scientists have shown the dog’s head reacting with a variety of stimuli: it flinched as the hammer banged and its eyes blinked as the light shone. Remarks that agree or disagree the action flooded the comment section, for …show more content…

Plenty of Animal rights organizations such ASPCA, Animal Defense League, ALB, have been resisting and protesting for a long time while numerous of animal researches are still implementing as regular. Starting along with philosophic concept of animal rights, the dissenters request law that completely banned any of the un-human activities that involved in animal testing to avoid suffering. As our world is developing rapidly together with increasing needs of advanced techniques, an expanding population start to accept or even contributed into animal testing as a way to attain new knowledge in biology, medicine and other areas, or to solve out specific problems. From this aspect, we do see a mass number of benefits that animal testing has brought to human …show more content…

But there are still many nations around the world refuse to recognize the rights of animals at the contemporary time. This means, torments and excruciation could be used on animals if necessary. (ex: recording the reactions of animals towards a particular type of stimuli). Experimental animals such as mice, frogs are born to suffer and being tortured. Many are living in the labs for their entire life with a given amount of food while they are supposed to live in the capacious forests or around the beautiful lake under the azure sky. Moreover, their natural instincts are replaced by domestic docility affected under the influence of human involvement. Therefore, this behavior may always been seen as inhumane and violating the basic moral value. Additionally, if animals living in wild life are being caught and placed in laboratories, the natural habitats would be disrupted thus causing chaos and even extinction among

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

The animals are forced to endure drug and chemical testing that can harm them. According to the People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals Organization, “Examples of animal tests include forcing mice and rats to inhale toxic fumes, force-feeding dogs pesticides, and dripping corrosive chemicals into rabbits’ sensitive eyes.” In addition, the New England Anti-Vivisection Society stated, “Animals in labs suffer not only pain from protocols, but also severe stress from day-to-day laboratory life. They spend their lives in barren cages, unable to make choices or express natural behaviors. Most never experience fresh air or sunshine, only bars and concrete.”

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

In a laboratory, all of the animals are crammed into small cages with no food or water, stretching room or fresh air to breath. Another regulatory requirement is that the United States Department of Agriculture requires institutions to report the number of animals used in research and the number of animals that experience pain or distress. In my opinion, this is far worse than any kind of animal abuse or torture; this is pure evil. Animal experimentation is inhumane because all of the animals are commonly subjected to force-feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint and numerous amounts of suffering that no animal should ever have to go through during its life. Animals are here to love and protect us, whether they are domestic or not.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is the inhumane act of using conscious, innocent animals to test products without care of what the aftermath may be. According to PETA, the largest animal rights organization in the world, more than 100 million animals are slaughtered in U.S. laboratories every year. Those who have the heart to inflict this type of brutality do this by immobilizing them in restraint devices for hours, in order to drill holes into their skulls and have their spinal cords crushed (PETA). Along with the physical atrocities that humans are forcing these vulnerable animals into, humans are also isolating them from their own kind, confining them in barren cages, and thus traumatizing them for the rest of their lives. Those who possess an ounce of compassion

Read More
1585 Words | 7 Pages

Yet, animal’s rights are violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice (“Save the Animals”)”. 3. Scientists still continue animal experimentation because they believe animals have no dignity and should simply be seen as objects in order to improve the life cycle. III. Inside laboratories, animals suffer too much and are continued to be treated inhumane.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing goes as far back to greek philosophers such as Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus (304 – 258 BC). Whom once performed testing on animals to advance behavior of something or who aspired to alter brain activity. However there was scientists such as Galen (129 – 199 / 217 AD), who used animals in order to attempt to improve various human activity within the body. Specifically focusing on cures and treatment for those who don't have them. Later, Ibn Zuhr began to use animal testing to benefit humans in which he would perform surgeries on them to ensure that the procedures would not harm humans.

Read More
2744 Words | 11 Pages

Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

Between animal rights activists and the scientists themselves, testing on animals has been a debatable subject for many years. Animal activists are known for being hard headed defenders for the rights of the friendly creatures on the planet, but the scientists believe in using the rodents for research purposes such as finding treatments and cures for genetic diseases and disorders. Thanks to the test subjects, scientists were able to find cures or treatments for breast cancer, cystic fibrosis, leukemia, and different types of sclerosis. Disorders and diseases like these are inherited, when genes pass from parents to their offspring.

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

There are many alternatives to animal testing that can be applied to cosmetic testing. These alternatives are seen as more ethical than the use of animals and more accurately apply to human biology instead of animal biology. One alternative for animal testing is to test on humans. Human testing has been used in many cases so long as it doesn’t prove to damage the subject.

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

These poor animals cannot takes their rights form people. Also animals in nature cannot speak or communicate with people and cannot avoid human for their abuse. It is unfair to use these creatures and they cannot say no or fight to survive and live normally. Also it is not fair to lets them suffering from pains and injections. Animals in the lab cannot feel free and cannot move in the cold cages.

Read More
1580 Words | 7 Pages

According to a study conducted by the Human Society International in 2015, “Over 115 million animals – mice, rats, dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, birds, among others – are killed in laboratory experiments worldwide for chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing every year” (“About Animal Testing”). Our society is full of violence and brutality, but while humans are able to have rights, to defend ourselves, and to ask for help, animals do not have such choices. Cruelty to animal is an act of violence or neglect committed against animals by humans, regardless of whether the act is against the law. Animal abuse can take many different forms, such as abandonment, scientific research, and mistreatment. Besides, animal cruelty also includes animal neglect of the failure to provide for the well-being of an animal.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Specific Purpose: By the end of my speech, the audience will know about the problem of conducting experiments on animals and the ethical issue of the cruel treatment of animals by the researchers. While the problem of conducting experiments on animals draws attention of the society, the speech would present the limitation of animal experiments and outline the alternatives. Central Idea: 1. Conducting experiments on animals has become one of crucial ethical issues of the modern society and it has even been banned in some countries.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Without animals we would have this and if you imagine what the animals had to go through to get where we are today, is just horrifying. Studies have shown that “According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the

Read More
2004 Words | 9 Pages

Animal rights is one of the least thought of controversial topics around the globe. Regardless of the way some of the population feels about this idea, there are few people who take responsibility in standing up for these powerless beings. Although it may seem that the negative treatment of these animals appears to be decreasing yearly, there are still a multitude of people who take advantage of these animals’ defenselessness. Due to the people who assert their dominance over animals, experimentation has become more accepted throughout the world. This is an inadequate way of attempting to find the answers and results to the questions of these experiments.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Should animals be suffering just because humans are trying to advance our medical techniques? Should they be forced to eat? Should people be allowed to torture them this way? Do you think so? In fact, more than 100 million animals are killed each year during scientific and commercial testing, in the U.S alone.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document