Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
Book banning in public schools should cease in existence, for the reason that controlling what students should or should not read violates the first amendment right of freedom of speech, some students to feel left out or treated as burdens when they are not allowed to read a book for an assignment, leaving minority students misrepresented or not represented at all, and preconditions the mindsets of students to formulate a preconceived idea rather than students formulating their own opinions. To form their own opinions students need to be exposed to all avenues in a safe, controlled environment, such as schools, in order to truly find out who they are, and who or what they want to represent. If parents have an issue with the topics discussed
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Do some books contain things that children should not be able to read? A lot of books are banned every year. Banning books protects children from inappropriate material. However, not banning books helps children prepare for real-world experiences. Teachers and parents cannot ban books, because they don’t have the right to, and books help children understand the world better.
What?! Is this a sick joke? Banning books? Wow, okay… let me regain my composure. Language is an extreme medium for some examples of crude behavior but to what extent must it be censored?
“Let readers be leaders” is the motto of Martha Hickinson, a school librarian who after hearing completely compelling and false statements about books at a school board meeting rallied and gathered around four hundred other people against the ban to speak out. There were speeches by adults and even students, and the fight dragged on where Hickinson received an immense amount of hate but in the end, the book was restored. This is a demonstration of how one person can change a lot. Overall, book banning is an ongoing issue happening right now. It is not only happening in schools, but at a national level.
Do you agree with the fact that children are reading books that have been known to contain harmful and racist ideas? There have been notable authors like Ronald Dahl or Dr. Suess whose books contain not only racism but also harmful and inappropriate words towards children. This is why books should be banned or censored under circumstances. Some of the reasons are because they contain harmful and inappropriate language that is not good for children, contain racist ideas that would obviously not be good for children, and even though that books should be banned it should only under extreme circumstances like the ones mentioned for the reasoning. The first reason to support the claim would be that people should have the ability to censor non
1- Sometimes government doesn't want people to know what is going on in the world, or what happened in the past. Some of the government wants people to follow their agenda and make people blind and not seeing the truth. In my opinion, in some cases, bane some books are good. For example, before we had a government that is banned many books. The reason why I agree with the previous government for this point, it was for people benefit and to protect them.
Banned Books Should school administrators be able to ban books? Recently schools have been trying to ban books in schools like the “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and “To Kill a Mockingbird” both these books were written more than 50 years ago. But what I think people should understand is these books were written in 1885 and 1960 so the events in the books were recent in US history. The reason schools want to ban the book is because it has a few bad words in the books.
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.
This article is talking about if banning books should be a thing or if we should keep books around because of the moral, religious, or political grounds. ¨In totalitarian societies, books have been banned for challenging a government’s ruling authority.” If they ban books they would be using less trees for paper to create books and other things. People can do their homework and find their resources online. “ The movement against the banning of books also has a long history.”
Books, Should We Ban Them Or Not: Banned books are books that have been taken out of public environments because of many different reasons. Books should not be banned simply because we have the rights to any books. Banned Books can teach important things about our history. Books that have been banned teach great morals/lesson even with the negative content. Banning Books infringes on people 's personal rights.
Intro 1: What if your young child is looking through a book at your public library and comes across a topic that was way too mature for their mind set. Would you be okay with it? A big controversial issue that has been going on in the past year is if books should be banned. Now, no one is trying to banish libraries across the globe but people have requested to ban books that are inappropriate. This matter has grown to be worse because everyone has an opinion.
At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.
Books should not be banned from schools and libraries, everyone should be allowed to be informed on what’s happening in the world and learn about diversity, despite a book having unpopular views. Opponents claim that all books should be monitored and banned if they give off unpopular opinion or can possibly hurt the public. 1.) One
