ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Breed Specific Laws

1548 Words7 Pages

Introduction Most dog owners will attest that their furry friend is much more than a four-legged animal. Dogs are man’s best friends, family members, comforters, protectors, and loyal companions. Leaving behind such a valuable, loved member of a family would be absurd, but states and cities around the country still enforce breed specific legislation driving dog owners relocate or forcing them to relinquish their best friends. Affecting dozens of breeds, states have put forth bans and restrictions on so-called dangerous dogs based on appearance. In an effort to decrease dog attacks, breed specific legislation was created to ban or restrict dangerous dogs. Under the original legislation, which most states still enforce, dangerous dogs were defined …show more content…

Greenwood continues to explain that other states like Texas and California have a law prohibiting breed specific legislation; however, California allows breed specific spay and neuter. Fortunately, some progress has been made in Ohio. According to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), North America’s first humane society, in 2012, the word “pit bull” was removed from the definition of a dangerous dog in the legislature; now, the statewide statue declares that only dogs with a history of violence are considered dangerous and are subject to the restrictions. Unfortunately, many cities in Ohio are still carrying out the restrictions based on a dog’s appearance alone. Fighting to protect an Ohio veteran and his pit bull, the ASPCA saw this violation of law as a city in Ohio tried to force the veteran to give up his dog. Successful, the ASPCA won the battle in court and saved a lifelong friendship. The ASPCA is continuing to stand alongside dog owners and fight breed specific legislation. Other small organizations have raised awareness for changing the legislation, but few have generated significant transformations. Instead of focusing their time and energy on confronting local governments and representatives, most of these organizations allocate …show more content…

Dr. Emily Weiss, Certified Applied Animal Behaviorist, collected data from a variety of dog shelters and found that pit bulls are the most euthanized breed in shelters around the United States. Over 25,000 pit bulls were put to death in 45 shelters in 2014; the next highest euthanized breed was the Labrador Retriever at only 7,000 dogs. Weiss explains that the reasons for most pit bull euthanasia were “related to breed specific legislation.” Weiss also discovered that the adoption rate of pit bulls and similar breeds were decreasing. If breed specific legislation is removed, then pit bull adoption rates will increase as euthanasia rates decrease. Owners of dogs who are currently defined as “dangerous” in legislature will be able to freely enjoy their companions without worry of animal control interfering. Indeed, dogs and their owners will be delighted to unite their family once again. With breed-neutral tactic in effect, the whole community will benefit from a more educated society. Complying with breed-neutral laws, the community will be safe. Dog fighting and animal abuse will decrease, and an increase in dog safety and training will increase. Shifting towards a breed-neutral approach will benefit canine and humans

Show More
Related
2018 Words | 9 Pages

It is not surprising that Arizona has such large numbers of dog attacks, with its enormous population and the tremendous amount of dog parks present in the state. Local Arizona dog owners face dangers that arise at local

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

The owners used dogs to fight, mostly pit bulls. That is why they are targeted. The text states, “Dog fighting was legal in most US states until the 1860s, and it was not completely outlawed in all states until 1976” (ProCon [3] [4]). This shows that people used their dogs for fighting when it was still legal.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

In the United States twenty-nine states are enforcing breed specific legislation since there is no state level law prohibiting the enforcement of the specific laws. There are four states that prohibit the enforcement of breed specific laws on a state level but some cases have slipped through the cracks of the state law due to being grandfathered in or finding a loophole through home-rule exemption. However, some states have begun enforcing more laws that identify, track, and regulate dangerous dogs not matter what the breed

Read More
1264 Words | 6 Pages

In this case, banning a certain breed does not stop bites or attacks from happening. Critics of BSL argue that the law is ineffective, as it does not address the root causes of dogs’ aggression, like irresponsible ownership,

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

BSL stands for “Breed-Specific Legislation”, and the only problem with this is that it bases its reasoning off of the looks of the animal. Legislation is beginning to be passed in different parts of the world, that discriminates dogs just because of their looks. There are many different opinions about this and its effectiveness. The main reason that cities and states pass this law is because there are often multiple cases of dog attacks, and BSL is supposed to improve public safety.

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

And while Foer is both thorough and logical in his argument for the practice, I wholeheartedly reject his opinion. He fails, I believe, to take into account the emotion wrapped up in this tricky subject. Dogs are companion animals. They are loyal, loving, obedient and fuzzy, and to millions of owners they are considered part of the family. Their nutritional content may be high, the sustainability

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

“In Calgary, Alberta, Canada,they wrote a community policing policy that focuses on aggression of dogs rather than the breed of dogs. ”Best Friends Animal Society explained three are mitigating factors in dog attacks, 97% of the owners had not sterilized the dogs, 84% of the owners had abused or neglected their dogs, and caused dog bites, and 78% were using the dogs as protective dogs for farms, or himself instead of keeping the dogs as home held pets.” With the safety of the US I think we should focus on bigger causes like maybe helping the homeless, instead of worrying about mistreated dogs. I can think of many problems in the Us, instead of pitbulls, like the constant rise of inflation, and other things that are hurting the US. What might happen to

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Breed-specific legislation is a law that prohibits or restricts the possession of a particular dog breed that has been determined as dangerous due to its propensities for aggressive and violent behavior. According to, the legislation had its origins during the 1980’s, after multiple attacks, injuries, and fatalities occasioned by certain breeds were reported. Most of victims were children and teenagers, and occasionally, adults. For example ….These attacks forced public officials, to develop more stringent laws governing dog restraint particularly on breeds related to the attacks.

Read More
377 Words | 2 Pages

The goal is how society can decrease the amounts of dogs admitted to these

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

People are becoming afraid of bully breeds because they hear stuff about them. The government is trying to find ways of getting these dogs out.. Some people love working with them, but just because some people work with them doesn’t mean everyone will like them. We need to help these dogs and save their lives. So many things happen to theses dogs lives.

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

Society as a whole is responsible for the negative ideas and opinions of the breed. The issue with the ban assumptions are made based on the idea of the dogs dangerous instead of facts relating to all

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

According to Dan Tillery of Best Friends Save Them All, ”The saddest part of my job is hearing the stories of loving family pets being torn from their families because of breed discriminatory legislation.” Just imagine the heartache if your pet was snatched away from you and killed just because of what he

Read More
1584 Words | 7 Pages

The dog fighting is a bloody activity that happens around the world , including the U.S. In our country, there are lot of activities or issues that lead to the argument throughout the nation. The dog fighting was the culture of our country after the Civil War, but with the cruel and and beastly, this sport becomes illegal and it’s felony over the nation and the territories .The dog fighting effects and harms many ways and many things, especially children, who attends the dog fighting. It also harms the dog fighter, those dogs whose are forced to fight, many dogs were treated badly with the bad conditions of living .

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

There is a long list of regulations that need to be meet to obtain a dog such as liability insurance mandatory spay or neuter and muzzled in public. With BSL the government basically controls who can and cannot have a banned

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

Justice for Dogs Have you ever seen a dog alone in the streets? And you want to pick them up and drop them off to the shelter but don’t have the time? Rather than picking up the dogs and dropping them off, you can help the poor animals from the very beginning. The little things like adopting a dog rather than buy a dog makes a huge difference.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Breed Specific Laws

Related Topics

Open Document