ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Bureaucracy

1481 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on the concept of bureaucracy

Bureaucracy: To most people and politicians: bureaucracy = negative connotation To scholars and bureaucrats: bureaucracy = neutral meaning Consists of appointed officials who work in a large and complicated organization Authority is divided among many groups of people Opposite of a dictatorship (bureaucracy is rule by many people who work together to make decisions) Ex. corporations, universities, congress Government by proxy: The principal our federal government runs on Consists of money given to private groups and local governments by the federal government in order to fund federal programs Ex. Social Security and medicare Negatives: The money sent to public and private agencies by the federal government is not regulated or monitored Citizens may …show more content…

Discretionary authority = the power of appointed officials to decide the course of action and make new policies Bureaucrats have a lot of discretionary authority because they have the ability to make policies that may not be regulated closely by congress Laws may be created by people with special expertise Ex. bureaucrats How does Congress exert control over the bureaucracy? Regulates the budget - can control how much money each agency in the bureaucracy receives Make investigations into scandals Can have hearings about various topics What happened to make the bureaucracy a “fourth branch” of American national government? The bureaucracy has a lot of power - can pass things easily Often easier than other branches of government The Great Depression and WWII helped increase the power of the bureaucracy Great depression resulted in a more active government Taxes increased after WWII What is the actual size and scope of the federal bureaucracy? Millions of employees, agencies, subcommittee, committee... What should be done to improve bureaucratic performance? Increase efficiency while decreasing

Show More
Related
500 Words | 2 Pages

In document C, there is a very useful chart that shows one way that each of the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) holds a little bit of power over the others. This is good because it means that no one part of government is above or below the others in terms of power, and there is always a way for one of them to be “checked” if they are becoming too tyrannical. For example, the President (executive) can veto Congressional legislation, but Congress (legislative) can impeach the President if necessary. Being able to “check” each other is one of the ways that the Constitution kept one group from having too much power. Another benefit of having the checks and balances system is that none of the three branches is so far apart from each that they have no power over the others, but they are far enough apart to prevent the power from accumulating.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

This divides power between 3 departments that can also stop each other from having too much power. The way the 3 branches check each other is the legislative branch can check the president by overriding his veto but the president can veto congressional legislation, the legislative branch can check the supreme court by impeaching judges and removing them from office but the supreme court can declare laws unconstitutional. The supreme court can check the president by declaring presidential acts unconstitutional but the president nominates the

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

“The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check in the other.” (Federalist Paper #51) (Doc C) The branches had some control of each other, so they can’t overpower each other. This helped balance the power so one branch doesn’t become an overpowered beast compared to the other branches.

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

As mentioned within the lessons, some of these powers include the power to initiate legislations, provide oversight, override presidential vetos, and to form the structure for judicial jurisdiction (Module 7 Lecture 2). In other words, Congress has the power to regulate government spending through all appropriations, keep an eye on other parts of the government to make sure that they are on track, and vote on reinstating vetoed bills by the President. To manage all the power, committees were introduced through the Legislation Reorganization Act of 1946. These committees within Congress take control of government programs that have powerful voters that vote for people to represent a legislative body. All in all, although Congress holds a lot of power, power is divided into various committees and regulated to contain the power within one

Read More
1123 Words | 5 Pages

In Federalist Paper #51 by James Madison it says “The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…. [The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” What this means is the founding fathers made it so each branch is able to check on the other branches making it so one branch does not become too powerful. Some examples of some of the things that the branches are able to do to check on each other are: the legislative branch can override a president's veto, the executive branch can nominate judges, and the judicial branch can declare laws unconstitutional.

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

As James Madison stated, “ The accumulation of all powers… in the same hands… may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” However, if you separate this power between multiple branches of government it provides a fairly effective safeguard against one person or group gaining too much power over the other. Also, along side with these separations, each appointed government official serves a certain term. After this term they either have to run again or cannot be in that position again. This protects against tyranny because without the ability to serve a full lifetime, it becomes extremely difficult to gain too much

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

The most important thing that the bureaucracy does is implement policy. Congress and the President make the policies and laws, but they have someone else (the bureaucracy) to implement them. However, they also make policy by rule-making (process of defining rules or standards that apply uniformly to classes of individuals, events, and activities). Also, according to Jillson (2016), "Congress passes laws that authorize government programs, the bureaucracy then writes specific rules that define how the program will be administered." So, when the bureaucracy makes rules you have to obey them because they have the force of law.

Read More
1748 Words | 7 Pages

the president by majority vote for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”.  After going from the house, two-thirds of the Senate must approve this request within the presence of the chief justice of the Supreme Court. o There have only been two successful impeachments in the history of the United States.  Andrew Johnson went against his own party in terms of policies regarding the Reconstruction era after the North won the Civil War.

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

Morning, My apologies, I am Fort Jackson, SC doing another Army school which greatly delayed my post this week. The federal bureaucracy is not a fourth branch of government, it is an agency that works for the President of the United States and thou they may (like the EPA Environmental Protection Agency) have their own agenda they are not a law making branch. If they do then you would have more agencies and their employees “doing their own thing” like Kim Davis the Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue a marriage licenses to same-sex couples even after the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefeel v. Hodges. They do handle almost every part of your life. It is believed there are probably over 2000 of these federal government agencies,

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

All of these branches come together to make America a democracy. Bureaucracy is the where the most important of decisions will be made and decided upon by the elected official. The executive branch is the law the branch that makes sure laws are executed. The executive is responsible for daily government functions, that they are properly functioning the way they should. When it comes to the legislature they have the important job of making and amending laws.

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

Bureaucracy is used in organisations to complete large-scale administrative tasks by appointing different people tasks in a methodical way. Bureaucracy has a few characteristics, so let’s see

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

Paper Four “To be superfluous means not to belong to the world at all” – (pp 475) Arendt views large, superfluous masses of people as a necessary precursor for the transition from a totalitarian movement to a totalitarian rule. These masses, formed from the atomization of the class system in a society, serve several purposes which allow for successful totalitarian rule: they help to act as the popular lever by which a totalitarian movement may secure power, they carry out the rote functions of the totalitarian rule, and most critically, they are killed or imprisoned in droves as a means of demonstrating and employing the power of the totalitarian system. This final purpose, the continual destruction of random portions of the atomized masses,

Read More
2492 Words | 10 Pages

In Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, Lipsky defines street-level bureaucrats as the “teachers, police officers and other law enforcement personnel, social workers, judges, public lawyers and other court officers, health workers, and many other public employees who grant access to government programs and provide services within them” (1980, 3). The book provides us with an insight into the everyday life of a street-level bureaucrat and shows their unmistakable role in delivering social services. Lipsky believes policy is best understood when looking at the people at the forefront of the implementation process; those that have to deal with both the government and the public. Overall, I found this book extremely

Read More
1371 Words | 6 Pages

2) Charismatic authority; where acceptance comes from faithfulness to and beliefs, personal qualities of the rulers. 3) Rational-legal authority; where acceptance came from the office, or position, persons authorized as limited by the rules and procedures of the organization. According to Weber, bureaucracy is a goal-oriented organization that operates efficiently to achieve their goals according to rational principles. And also, according to Weber, bureaucratic organizations operate “sine ira ac studio, meaning without a sense of bias of favor, relying solely on a professional decision-maker” (Rheinstein, 1954, 190-2). Hierarchical bureaucracy is one of the key features and essential in an organization.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Bureaucracy

Related Topics

Open Document