The Pros And Cons Of Climate Change

Climate change, a subject you might’ve heard a lot about as a kid, but is coming back to the center of attention in recent years. Climate change has recently been up for debate; is it a hoax? Is it natural or is it a man-made problem we need to fix? Although, there are scientific facts to prove it’s a real problem, a lot of conspiracy theorist and unqualified people will testify that everything’s alright. Overall, 97% of qualified scientist agree climate change is real and are trying to come up with theories, policies, and effective plans for governments to put in place. But, even the countries that are trying to combat the problem aren’t making an enormous difference. That’s because climate change isn’t just one problem that can be solved

Another rebuttal on why climate change isn’t real would be how some think it’s a complete hoax set up by our or another countries’ government. Donald Trump has said, “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese to make U.S. manufacturing .... Global warming is a total, and very expensive, hoax” (@TheRealDonaldTrump). Since I believe climate change is real most of my sources will say undeniable scientific evidence on why climate change is real, what it is, how it affects us, animals, the environment, business, the economy and how we can stop it from continuously getting worse. NASA is an organization specializing in everything scientific on and off the earth. On their website article, Global Climate Change: “Vital Signs of The Earth”, NASA’s scientist explain why climate change is real. With their advance technology, qualified scientist and precise scientific techniques they provide charts, videos, links to outside sources as evidence supporting their

The ‘ordinary science intelligence’ scale, is a technology that helps scientist collect data, that correlates evolution and global warming. Meaning the evolution is all species on earth and earths physical and chemical changes. “OSI_2.0” is intended for use in the experimental study of risk related to the science of climate. “Correspondingly, political conflict over human-caused global warming is attributed to deficiencies in public science literacy” (Miller). “Data collected on ‘OSI_2.0’ suggests the cause of climate change, at least for the US, is human-caused not a natural occurrence like the ice age. These risks pose a more convincing view as indicators of the aspects of our personal identity associated with how we view and care about the planet” (Kahan, Dan). The political outlooks of these indicators of science comprehension differ from the individual indicators which imply that governments tend to disregard this evidence verses the citizens themselves believing this is a problem. To conclude, “the efficacy of OSI_2.0 is briefly illustrated by its use to assess standard survey items on evolution and global warming: when administered to members of a US general population sample, these items are more convincingly viewed as indicator’s, climate change is factual”