ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

1055 Words5 Pages

Guns are perceived as bad almost everywhere now. The reasoning behind this is people think if they didn’t have guns all of the shootings, bombings, and crime would all go away. The only thing that would come from taking guns away from the people is that they would be defense less and more targeted than ever by terrorists and criminals. People will always have access to illegal things such as drugs, bombs, and if guns are banned they will always be able to get them. Guns are seen as the cause of mass shootings and murders across the world and people wanna get rid of them, however people can still get there hands on guns so if you take away the citizens guns no one can defend themselves. Paris suffered from a shooting from Isis. A terrorist …show more content…

A lot of people think if there was a gun control law that the kid that came to Harrisburg couldn’t have been able to do the shooting and none of that would have happened. We need to realize that in the world there will always be people who wanna hurt other people and even the people you love could get hurt too. Yes, he probably couldn’t have had an opportunity to shoot up the school if there was a gun control ban. I do agree with people that think it could have been prevented but they have to see something. He wanted to hurt someone and if he couldn’t get to a gun he would have found another way to hurt people. Same with shootings or murders anywhere else. People are mentally unstable and just wanna hurt people and need help. If they don’t receive it something bad will …show more content…

There was a 10.9-13 homocide rate per one million people.Then in 1996 when they uplifted the ban on gun control in 2003 the homocide rate went up to 18. At the same time the British government put 20,000 cops into the country of the UK and almost immediately the amount of homocide dropped from an 18 to an eleven. If we put a gun control ban and then give the guns back there will be a larger crime rate than ever but it’s a short spike that never lasts that long and goes back to normal later on. The amount of authority around the country is a huge factor as well.
Justin King the man who wrote The Facts That Neither Side Wants To Admit About Gun Control says “Plain and simple. Gun control has no significant impact on murder rates. Removing firearms does not typically create massive lawlessness.” Australia put a gun control on. They wanted to see there crime rate go up or down by taking away firearms. They did this and the amount of crime stayed the same, murder rates stayed the same, and even all of the theft rates stayed the same. They concluded that the gun control act made no

Show More
Related
331 Words | 2 Pages

In the short passage by Kierstin Koppel titled “Humanizing Morticians,” she uses a lot of figurative language to give a mortician a wonderful personality. Koppel’s first sentence even depicts a very vivid scene, “The corpse lies bare under a white sheet waiting to be dissected and reconstructed through a series of surgical procedures” (Koppel). This sentence does not only describe an interesting scene, but it also grabs the reader’s attention by explaining what the passage is going to be about. Later, Koppel begins to explain her own point of view when it comes to being a mortician.

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

In this world, there are too many people that have died from guns. Some of them have died in large-scale attacks, some of them were in a gun accident. Many want more gun control laws to be passed. In fact, the gun control law must be passed through, because this can be more effective to protect people. people always thinking if they have a gun, they can protect themselves.

Read More
1313 Words | 6 Pages

If you compare the United States’ crime rate to the United Kingdom 's crime rate, it is infact higher statistically. However many countries measure their murder rates differently like the United States and United Kingdom, the United States includes both murder and manslaughter in their murder rate while the United Kingdom only includes murders. Also the United States has almost almost five times the population that the United Kingdom has making it more likely for the United States to have a higher murder rate. This makes the United States seem to have a much higher murder rate than other countries, falsely reinforcing pro-gun control arguments because infact the United Kingdom has a higher murder rate (“Murder and

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

In Australia, guns were taken by the government in what they referred to as a buy back set up but it was mandatory. Immediately after this, the country’s rape, assault, and other crimes increased dramatically but steadily lowered after the course of several years. Gun control has actually had no significant impact on Australia’s murder rates. They have remained steady, proving that increased gun control has no affect on overall murder rates. Because it is clear that “gun control has no significant impact on murder rates” we can be sure that increased gun control has very little to no benefits (King).

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

In 2014, with the population up from about 18 million to 23 million, Australia has 238 murders, of which 35 were with guns” (Kaye and Cole). If other countries have already made tighter gun restrictions and they are successful, why wouldn’t we take this data and make our own gun laws. Guns kill hundreds of thousands of people every year. Obviously, this number is way too high, and to decrease this statistic, change needs to occur.

Read More
407 Words | 2 Pages

Statistics show that in 2002 increase in gun control the crime rate involving firearms have dropped. In Australia in the course of 25 years with the strict gun laws in place the crime rate involving firearms has dropped 49%. With the idea of stricter gun laws in

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

There has been some bad history with guns, (especially in the wrong hands). There was an incident at a school in Newtown, Connecticut, where a boy named “Adam Lanza” went into an elementary school and starting shooting at all the kids and staff at the school. When the first call to 911 was sent out it took police 3 minutes and 21 seconds for the first officers to get there. The gun rights are from

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

More gun laws will lead to more gun crime rates. As the famous saying goes, “If guns are outlawed; only outlaws will have guns.” The United States has about 88.8 guns per 100 people, which is about 270,000,000 total. This is the highest per capita and total number in the world (ProCon “Background of the Issue” 1). Guns were very common and dated back to Colonial America.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

It’s been said by many people that guns need controlled restricted and even banned. Restricting who gets their hands on guns is a good thing, but it has shown that countries with more restrictive gun licensing laws show fewer deaths by firearms and a lower gun ownership rate. A lab was done and showed that for every 100 people there is about 88 guns. Stated in the same article on the Huffington post it was said that “similar results have been found by the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, which states that countries with higher levels of firearm ownership also have higher firearm homicide rates.” (Huffington post 2015).

Read More
1445 Words | 6 Pages

There is no correlation between gun laws and gun crimes. In the United States many different Cities have their own gun laws and some are stricter than others. In a city like Chicago the gun control is strict but the homicide and crime rate are extremely high. Chicago’s strict gun laws are not stopping any crimes, this is because criminals in chicago have many ways to obtain a firearm illegally. The easiest way criminals get firearms is by stealing them.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

With all the school shootings, or club shootings, or even public shootings, you would probably think it’s a good idea to talk all the guns away from everyone. It might be a good idea, but many people disagree with that. There are many protests all over the United States protesting guns, and people that protest to keep guns. There are many political views on this topic but, I think that the people of the United States of America should be allowed to keep their firearms. Guns are more than just guns to some people.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

The media leads you to believe in these days that guns shoot you by themselves and they are some big scary killing machine that is uncontrollable. As a result of this, the left wants to ban guns and is not considering any other options. People should be shifting their attention to other things. The issue is not the guns, it is the people that are using them.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

My initial reasoning on passing gun control laws would reduce gun deaths in America. In 1999, we witnessed columbine. Since then, America has not enforced strict gun control laws. As a result, we had school or mass shooting in America almost every year since columbine. The fact we had Fort Gibson, Flint Michigan, Lakewood Florida, Louisiana, and many more, just proves that there were no laws to pass gun control.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

Before researching more in depth, I believe bad people do bad things and banning guns will not be effective in stopping it. Australia is a great example of a country banning certain guns and the crime and homicide rate have both

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

First and foremost, banning guns will not stop criminals from obtaining and committing crimes with them. Furthermore, guns don’t kill people; people kill people. Lastly, guns prevent the government from becoming tyrannical and oppressive. At first, one may think that banning guns would be a superb solution to the growing problem of gun violence.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document