Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
A study on juvenile offenders
Pros of juvenile delinquency
Reducing recidivism for juvenile offenders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A study on juvenile offenders
Pros of juvenile delinquency
Reducing recidivism for juvenile offenders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A study on juvenile offenders
Some may disagree because others would say 17 years old is too young for a teenager or juvenile to be facing time in prison. Some may disagree with the assertion by saying that placing a juvenile in prison is similar to keeping a child in prison as well. While it is true that 17 years old is too young for a juvenile to be in prison, it does not necessarily mean that the brain can’t function correctly. This is a serious issue because a similar case relates to this, when a teenage girl named Alyssa murdered her neighbor Elizabeth by strangling her and stabbing her to
In British Columbia, the juvenile justice system accepts offenders ages 12 and 18 because this system believes that since their brain is not fully developed, there is a good chance that they can learn from their mistakes and gain more awareness about the consequences and how they can affect you in the long term. In certain cases, if the crime committed is very serious, the judge can decide whether or not they should be tried as an adult, even if still a minor. For example, in this book the judge wanted Richard tried as an adult since Sasha was left in horrendous conditions. This example should have been laid out in a different way, no minor should be put in adult confinement no matter the crime since adult confinements are much more intense and violent than juvenile confinements. Teenagers and youth should not be introduced to the violence held in these confinements since it can create new bad habits that can more so affect their life and make it worse whether then rehabilitation which is the main focus in juveniles.
Unquestionably, the death sentencing of juvenile offenders has been relatively a controversial issue due to the aftermath of Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988) and Stanford v. Kentucky (1989), which were landmark cases that dealt with capital punishment of a minor that overturned the death sentence because it was classified as cruel and unusual punishment. In addition, the Supreme Court found that minors lack the experience, perspective, and judgement expected of adults, therefore the death penalty may be a severe punishment for minors. Besides that, the application of the death penalty for juvenile offenders is creating significant international concern with the United States being one of countries to currently allow juvenile offenders to be executed.
Crimes are happening around us whether we pay attention to them or not. Those crimes as dangerous as murder are committed by all ages but should younger criminal in their juvenile age received the same punishment as older criminals. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the Eighth Amendment.(On-Demand Writing Assignment Juvenile Justice) Advocates on the concurring side believes that mandatory life in prison is wrong and should be abolish. However, the dissenting side believe that keeping the there should be a life in prison punishment for juvenile who commit heinous crime regardless of their age.
Imagine that you are 17 and assaulted or killed a person by accident. They have found you guilty and decided to put you in an adult institution with level 4 maximum security, which is very violent. How would you feel? This has happened to juveniles before, they were tried as adults and some sent to life in prison. Juveniles should be rehabilitated and given a second chance instead of being tried as an adult and placed in jail or sentenced to death because a kid’s brain has not yet fully developed and it could help make them a better person.
I do not think that we should get rid of the juvenile court system. These youth are at a critical point in their life where they can still be rehabilitated with the correct tools and approaches. It would be unfair to subject juveniles to adult court due to the fact they may not even have the mental capability yet to know what is going on, or even understand their crime, or the extent of it. Furthermore, due to not having a fully developed mental status positive change such as rehabilitation can be extremely useful.
Juvenile Detention Centers Do you know any youth that have gotten into so much trouble that they got sent off to a juvenile detention center? These youths are ones that do not know how to act. Juvenile Detention Centers are for the youth that find themselves in trouble, but the centers also offers education, living and other needs, while also ensuring they will be at court on their date. A day in the life of detention is very scary. When you first arrive the youth is removed from the cop car and led inside to the exterior doors and in the entrance of the hall.
In the juvenile justice system juveniles, should be convicted as adults for major crimes caused by adolescents. in the terms of the different crimes there is a different punishment but not for murder is seams that some get one harsh punishment than the other. There are two ways to go as if you look at the pros and cons on a good route or a bad route, as the good one leads you to good things in life and the other bad things happen, therefore going to the good route is the best way to go but this not the case with our juveniles. They may start good but something may happen during that route that they get side tracked and start doing crimes. Juveniles already know what is right and wrong.
The penalties available to judges that they can consider when sentencing an offender will heavily depend on what purpose they wish the punishment to serve, the punishment may seek to rehabilitate, act as a deterrence or serve as retribution. The possible penalties that can be delivered to an offender will be a Non-Custodial, Semi-Custodial or Custodial sentence. The penalties that a judge can choose are highly effective as they balance the rights of the community, the victim and the offender as well as enforcing the morals and ethics of society. The Non-Custodial punishments available to judges to use in the sentencing of offenders are highly effective as they provide alternative options that promote rehabilitation.
When it comes to being released from prison there are different obligations of supervision for offenders. Some of these different obligations are known as parole, supervised release and mandatory release. These responsibilities vary in supervision requirements and responsibilities of the offenders being released. However, each type of these releases is offered on a case to case basis and is dependent on the type of offences and the sentence given to of each individual offender. Parole is not a guarantee and is process that is dependent on a variety of circumstances.
Methodology What is the problem being addressed by your research study? The purpose of the research study is to address the disadvantages of juvenile correctional facilities and to propose alternative options to help reduce juvenile delinquency. Some juveniles do benefit from being placed in correctional facilities, however, recidivism rates of 41.3% in 2013 (Wilson and Hoge, 2013) suggests that there are needed alternatives to reduce criminal activity among juveniles.
Supporting Evidence We have to bare in mind that a minor's brain is still not fully developed. They are still not completely capable of understanding the right from wrong as an adult is But as a pro to this .Teenagers, unlike adults, are more capable of change in their criminal ways/actions. Teenagers are also less likely to commit any offences again (Hertz, Randy) after being sent to or put through any type or reformation. This shows that minors truly are misguided and are just in need of a little push in the right direction.
When children and teens commit a violent crime such as murder, courts convict them as adults. This means that children as young as eight have been tried as adults in court. Eventually, these convicts will be housed in jails with adults. Despite the federal law stating that juvenile and adult inmates must be separated, most states do not comply with these rules. Furthermore, a law that varies throughout the states is the age in which courts send the children to adult or juvenile prisons.
Juvenile Justice Should juveniles get treated as adults that’s one of the biggest controversy in our nation now days, with many juveniles committing crimes that are inconceivable according to their age. Judges have the last word on how to treat this young people. Many people argue that “the teens that are under eighteen are only kids, they won’t count them as young adults, not until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager this people are to call them adults” (Lundstrom 87). This is why people can’t come to a decision as how these young people should be treated like.
Under section 69 – Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 has been repealed. According to Section 20 of the new Act, all proceedings in respect of Juvenile pending in any court on the date on which this Act comes into force, shall be continued in that court as if this Act had not been passed and if the court finds that the Juvenile has committed an offence, it shall record such finding and instead of passing any sentence in respect of Juvenile, forward the juvenile to the board which shall pass orders in respect to that juvenile in accordance with the provisions of this Act. According to opening sentence of the new Act, this is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to juvenile in conflict with law and children in need to care and protection, by providing for proper care, protection and treatment by catering to their development needs, and by adopting a chid-friendly approach in the adjudication and disposition of matters in the best internet of children and for their ultimate rehabilitation