ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Mayor Bloomberg's Soda Ban

465 Words2 Pages
Is the health of the community worth giving up a sugary drink such as soda? There has been multiple opinions in New York City concerning Mayor Bloomberg’s soda ban, which limits the size of sugary drinks such as soda, in order to alert people about health awareness. The soda ban is controversial because part of the populous feel like they can consume any type of sugary drink due to their certain rights in America. On the other hand, countless of people say that the ban is for their own well- being. The ban is an excellent idea because soda is the dominant cause of being unhealthy and it is a waste of money. To begin with, the soda ban would benefit the public because soda is the reason why numerous of people are unhealthy. According to
Show More
Related
635 Words | 3 Pages

Should Soda Pop Vending Machines Be Permit on Middle School and High School Campuses? In many schools, soda pop vending machines would be the essay way to provide a popular drink such as coke in middle schools even in high schools but can you imagine if this will be continued? For many reasons this product can be the majority of problems in obesity in more diseases why? coke contain a substance harmful for our health, the way how we manipulate this type of drink, well there are some information that infers.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

One reason why I'm against the ban is the government shouldn't be the ones making decisions for us. For example, in "Ban the Ban" by SidneyAnne Stone, she stated that "People might think it is not important because it is just soda but it is so much more than that—it is about freedom and the

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

This displays the idea of the “slippery slope” mentioned in the same article. The evidence proves that the soda ban should not have even been considered in the first place because nothing is wrong with a company selling legal drinks to consumers. Others argue that the soda ban is helpful, because it encourages a healthier lifestyle. The soda ban would decrease obesity and

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

The soda ban, isn’t a voted decision, but more so a individually chosen decision that will not only affect the citizens of New York, but the businesses as well. Mayor Bloomberg runs the Board of Health; and who better to decide whether the ban is valid than the Board? As the Board makes the decision, it is also under the control of the Mayor. By obvious clues, Bloomberg executive makes his bias decision.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

The government should not regulate personal choices like it did with the New York City soda ban because it violates the U.S. Constitution and what it stands for. The soda ban is causing people to not make their own choice on what they want to buy. One reason the soda ban is bad is because it has stripped the rights of the citizens that live in New York. I say this because the soda ban has removed the rights of the citizens that America has given them. The ninth amendment allows U.S citizens the right to privacy and freedom of choice.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, Cigarettes affect more than one person. The Soda Ban is something we shouldn't be worried about if we have another problem possibly killing someone faster and quickly. Despite the mentions of it reducing health issues, the ban still does not deserve to be put in place since there are other severe problems that should be discussed

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

Some may disagree with me because the ban does limit the amount of soda a single

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

They can argue that a ban on sugary drinks could help improve health problems such as obesity. Although it may seem reasonable like a reasonable solution, it can actually have negative effects on people. What good is a law when it can’t solve the issue it was made for. Therefore, the soda ban should not be put in place due to how it doesn’t solve the health problems it was made for. In the Washington times article by Samantha Gross, Joy Dubost, a nutritionist who works for the National Restaurant Association, explains what problems that limiting soda can cause.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Itś not a good explanation or intention to take away something so little to try to support something so big. Also stated in ¨Ban the Ban!,¨ ẗhe author goes on to discuss how the soda ban is surrounding over something huge and not just soda, saying, ¨People might think it’s not important because it is just soda, but it is so much more than that- it is about freedom to make your decisions about what you do and what you put into your bodies.¨ (Stone, 288) Adding to, itś taking the little and simple freedom that everyone should have. The mayor and the government does not have the right to make your decisions that you can make on your own. Itś your body.

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

Truthfully, it is about the world thinking about the decisions they make. But, the ban does restrict all drinks ran by city that are above 16oz or have 50% or more of milk and fruit juice. However the soda ban may have some positive effects, ultimately the ban is a bad idea. Due to the contradiction it brings, the fact there is only one person making the decisions, and the other ways people can spend money.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

Obesity is a major problem, but soda is not the only problem. The people who think the soda ban was a good idea are wrong because this is not really the most important thing to worry about. “When Mayor Bloomberg implemented laws banning smoking in bars, parks and restaurants, that made sense.” (Stone,287) This shows that there are more important things to worry about.

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

58% of New York City adults, as well as an astonishing 40% of children, are overweight or obese. Sugar is a major contributing factor to weight gain, as it is high in calories and promote fat storage. In recent years, companies have pounced on the opportunity to make money with larger portions of drinks such as soda. NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg decided that it was time for the city to take action. In 2013, he introduced a ban on large drinks in the city.

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

There are not any studies that prove that placing taxes on soda will decrease obesity. Lately, many cities and states are contemplating whether or not to add these taxes. Hillary Clinton agrees with the tax, but Bernie Sanders opposes it. Soda Companies think that using commercials and making healthier drinks will be better than taxes them. Taxing unhealthy drinks is a way to reduce America’s obesity level.

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

In the end soda should be allowed in all middle schools. Some reason it should be is kids need more of a choice at school and soda is not the cause of all the bad stuff. I always wonder, why can adults have soda at work but middle schoolers can’t have soda at school? That is unfair and that is why I think middle schoolers should be able to have soda at

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

If people were really dedicated about getting their soda fix, they would have to pay double or even triple to get over the ban limit. Buying multiple drinks of soda so they can rot their insides. They are paying to hurt themselves, and at that point you really know what you’re doing and why you’re responsible for your actions. Even if the result of this ban is minimal, at least it keeps people protected from themselves for drinking too much soda. All in all, it is mostly companies that want the consumer to keep buying their products so they can make more money.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Mayor Bloomberg's Soda Ban

Related Topics

Open Document