ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Soda Ban

887 Words4 Pages

¨Several critics questioned why the city was making a proposal on sugary drinks a priority when some city schoolchildren have no physical education classes.¨ (Washington TImes) In New York, Mayor Bloomberg placed a law on the sizes of soda citizens are allowed to get. However, this caused a lot of controversy on whether the ban was good or bad. Despite the amount of people supporting the ban´s choice, the ban does have some downsides on it. It is not a good idea to limit the amount of a soda a person can purchase (or propose the ban) because it's not applying to all, it's taking rights away from people, and itś not a big deal. The soda ban should not be placed down since it is not applied to all, but a certain amount of people. It is not going …show more content…

According to SydneyAnne Stone, ¨If, despite all those efforts, some choose to have a sugary drink anyway, that is their choice and their right. If they know all the facts and they do it anyway, that is a personal choice.¨ (Stone, 287) It's not the mayor's choice to decide how much one consumes or whether they should consume it or not. This evidence goes on upon how itś taking the right. Itś not a good explanation or intention to take away something so little to try to support something so big. Also stated in ¨Ban the Ban!,¨ ẗhe author goes on to discuss how the soda ban is surrounding over something huge and not just soda, saying, ¨People might think it’s not important because it is just soda, but it is so much more than that- it is about freedom to make your decisions about what you do and what you put into your bodies.¨ (Stone, 288) Adding to, itś taking the little and simple freedom that everyone should have. The mayor and the government does not have the right to make your decisions that you can make on your own. Itś your body. Only you have control of it. Overall, the ban is not allowing freedom and the right for us, as humans, to make our own individual

Show More
Related
343 Words | 2 Pages

The New York State Court of Appeals ultimately made the right decision to block Bloomberg’s “soda ban”. There are some things that you can’t do, and there are some things that you aren’t allowed to do. The New York City Board of Health exceeded its regulatory authority by adopting the “Sugary Drinks Portion cap Rule”. “...The New York City Board of Health, in adopting

Read More
317 Words | 2 Pages

As the New York Mayor Michal Bloomberg is taking action against a soft drink industry. Mayor says that a ban is imposed on it because it has a big sugary drink. The mayor behavior could be considered biased towards specific company or product. There are lots of other, he should not ignore others. Everyone knows that lots of sugar are becoming the cause of problems in people like we drink almost daily like Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and other major soft drinks.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

One reason why I'm against the ban is the government shouldn't be the ones making decisions for us. For example, in "Ban the Ban" by SidneyAnne Stone, she stated that "People might think it is not important because it is just soda but it is so much more than that—it is about freedom and the

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Should soda really be considered as hazardous or toxic as people make it seem? In the texts “Three Cheers for the Nanny State”, “Ban the Ban”, and “Sodas a Problem But…”, it all shows evidence on how the soda ban is good or how it is bad. Also they talk about how it is harmful but is it really that harmful to where there is a need to ban it. Although some people may think the soda ban is a great idea there are numerous downsides to it such as only eliminating certain sizes, more harmful things to worry about, and that fact that there is no purpose behind the ban. The soda ban is a bad idea because it only eliminates certain sizes over 16oz.

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

“That’s what life is all about, isn’t it? Choices, informed decisions... what I do not respect is having my civil liberties stripped away.” , stated by Karin Klein in the short article, Ban the Ban!. One of the many values of the American life, is freedom, but to have options of what you can drink, to be taken away from you isn’t honestly moral.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

The government should not regulate personal choices like it did with the New York City soda ban because it violates the U.S. Constitution and what it stands for. The soda ban is causing people to not make their own choice on what they want to buy. One reason the soda ban is bad is because it has stripped the rights of the citizens that live in New York. I say this because the soda ban has removed the rights of the citizens that America has given them. The ninth amendment allows U.S citizens the right to privacy and freedom of choice.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

To begin with, the soda ban would benefit the public because soda is the reason why numerous of people are unhealthy. According to

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

¨Several critics questioned why the city was making proposal on sugary drinks a priority when some city schoolchildren have no physical education classes.¨ (Washington TImes) In New York, Mayor Bloomberg placed a law on the sizes of soda citizens are allowed to get. However, this caused a lot of controversy on whether the ban was good or bad. Despite the amount of people supporting the ban´s choice, the ban does have some downsides on it. It is not a good idea to limit the amount of a soda a person can purchase (or propose the ban) because it's not applying to all, it's taking rights away from people, and itś not a big deal.

Read More
307 Words | 2 Pages

The New York soda ban was a big issue for citizens. There are a lot of Americans that are obese and were worried about the ban of large size sodas. The ban was rejected and there is a good reason. Banning sodas is not the solution for obesity. The New York soda ban is not effective and people need to understand that it is not just sodas that causes it.

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

Some may disagree with me because the ban does limit the amount of soda a single

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

If schools do not offer the nutritious drinks, some students could suffer from malnutrition and other devastating diseases. Heart disease is a major disease in America, it is responsible for millions of deaths each year. The sugar in pop, and carbohydrates in other popular drinks are the two main causes of heart disease. Firstly, thousand of kids are already obese in America, giving them nutritious

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

The soda ban is a defective idea in itself because of the loopholes in the plan. As Karin Klien talks about the problem in her article “Sodas a Problem but…”, “Convenience stores such as 7-Eleven are overseen by State and would be exempt , but a Burger King across the street would be restricted” (Klien, 288). In addition, there isn’t a need for this soda ban because it makes no sense for a customer at a fast food restaurant (like Subway) to walk across the street and go to a 7-eleven, which is a state-ran store that has drinks that are over 16oz., and even over 64oz. People could even go to a grocery store and buy a 2-liter bottle of the sugary drink because it isn’t run by the city. Another way the soda ban contradicts itself is because of how you’d get the same amount of sugar if you were to drink a drink from a smoothie

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

However, the ban was only on drinks like soda, not milkshakes, and not in all locations, either. The counterarguments to the ban included that it infringed on people’s liberties and that it actually was not efficient. According to one poll, people bought more soda when offered smaller portions than when buying larger portion. Additionally, 60% of New Yorkers opposed the

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

Each year, billions of gallons of soda are sold in the United States alone.” Soda must be allowed to middle schoolers during school hours. Soda should be allowed because kids need more of a choice at school and soda is not the cause of all the bad stuff. Soda must be allowed at middle school because kids need more of a choice at school. At many schools the only things to drink are milk, water, and a few other juices you have to pay extra for.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

The purpose of this section is to highlight the two main theories that will be used to explain the self-help housing phenomenon in the study area. Firstly, the use of the Neo-liberal theory is an attempt to clarify and explain the meaning, nature and challenges of the economic context associated with the phenomenon of self-help housing and housing consolidation. Secondly, the Positivist theory will be used to predict and understand why the self-help housing phenomenon may unfold. In the specific context of housing and for the purpose of this study, the positivist theory will be presented to interpret housing in three dimensions which could explain or justify the reasoning behind incentives of self-help housing for low income households.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Soda Ban

Related Topics

Open Document