“The Portion Cap Ruling, commonly known as the soda ban, was to restrict the sale of sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces…” (Dr. Lisa Firestone). The New York City Board of Health exceeded its power limit. Along with the fact that New York City lost its final appeal when the rule was in place. Whereas sugary drinks are a key driver, personal limits make it a key driver of obesity.
In 2013, Mayor Bloomberg established the soda ban in New York City and it was restricted to 16 oz bottles. In the article “Three Cheers for the Nanny State” by Sarah Conly stated that the soda ban was needed to help people because we don’t always make the best decisions however, In “ Ban the Ban! By SidneyAnne stone she explains why we don’t need the government to restrict our options and control us in addition to “Soda’s a Problem but…” by Karin Klein she also states that the government should not be allowed to restrict our options on soda when there are far worst problems in the world the government needs to fix. Overall, Karin Klein's statement was much more reasonable saying that she believes that the government should not be able to control us and we believe that we can do things on our own but need options and they should not be able to strip our options away.
Should Soda Pop Vending Machines Be Permit on Middle School and High School Campuses? In many schools, soda pop vending machines would be the essay way to provide a popular drink such as coke in middle schools even in high schools but can you imagine if this will be continued? For many reasons this product can be the majority of problems in obesity in more diseases why? coke contain a substance harmful for our health, the way how we manipulate this type of drink, well there are some information that infers.
One reason why I'm against the ban is the government shouldn't be the ones making decisions for us. For example, in "Ban the Ban" by SidneyAnne Stone, she stated that "People might think it is not important because it is just soda but it is so much more than that—it is about freedom and the
Should soda really be considered as hazardous or toxic as people make it seem? In the texts “Three Cheers for the Nanny State”, “Ban the Ban”, and “Sodas a Problem But…”, it all shows evidence on how the soda ban is good or how it is bad. Also they talk about how it is harmful but is it really that harmful to where there is a need to ban it. Although some people may think the soda ban is a great idea there are numerous downsides to it such as only eliminating certain sizes, more harmful things to worry about, and that fact that there is no purpose behind the ban. The soda ban is a bad idea because it only eliminates certain sizes over 16oz.
But. know this and provide evidence and reasoning to support this claim. One reason the soda ban should be removed is because taking away large sodas is giving the people less freedom and is taking away one of their choices. For instance, the text,
“That’s what life is all about, isn’t it? Choices, informed decisions... what I do not respect is having my civil liberties stripped away.” , stated by Karin Klein in the short article, Ban the Ban!. One of the many values of the American life, is freedom, but to have options of what you can drink, to be taken away from you isn’t honestly moral.
The government should not regulate personal choices like it did with the New York City soda ban because it violates the U.S. Constitution and what it stands for. The soda ban is causing people to not make their own choice on what they want to buy. One reason the soda ban is bad is because it has stripped the rights of the citizens that live in New York. I say this because the soda ban has removed the rights of the citizens that America has given them. The ninth amendment allows U.S citizens the right to privacy and freedom of choice.
To begin with, the soda ban would benefit the public because soda is the reason why numerous of people are unhealthy. According to
Furthermore, Cigarettes affect more than one person. The Soda Ban is something we shouldn't be worried about if we have another problem possibly killing someone faster and quickly. Despite the mentions of it reducing health issues, the ban still does not deserve to be put in place since there are other severe problems that should be discussed
In The Fire Next Time Baldwin informs his grandson about the living in the ghetto and how he will live and die in the there. He will never know what it is like to live a life more successful than his father’s. Due to his harsh living condition he creates a hard exterior to protect himself against the harsh environment around him, but he deep down he believes that the white men’s degrading term are true. Society’s views on black men have pushed him into a area or social status where he is supposed to be staying at.
Truthfully, it is about the world thinking about the decisions they make. But, the ban does restrict all drinks ran by city that are above 16oz or have 50% or more of milk and fruit juice. However the soda ban may have some positive effects, ultimately the ban is a bad idea. Due to the contradiction it brings, the fact there is only one person making the decisions, and the other ways people can spend money.
Should the Government Limit the Size of Sugary Drinks Should the government tell us how to live our lives? The government should not limit the amount of sugary drinks because its an american right to choose what we eat and sugary drinks are not the leading contributor to health problems. First of all limiting the size of sugary drinks is not the root of the problem, its the natural craving for sweet foods and the lack of education of its bad effects. There is little to no education on the bad effects of sugary drinks and foods so thats really not our problem its the government for the lack of learning about these types of harmful foods. Sugary drinks may be one of the leading factors, but there are other foods that are just as bad.
However, the ban was only on drinks like soda, not milkshakes, and not in all locations, either. The counterarguments to the ban included that it infringed on people’s liberties and that it actually was not efficient. According to one poll, people bought more soda when offered smaller portions than when buying larger portion. Additionally, 60% of New Yorkers opposed the
In the end soda should be allowed in all middle schools. Some reason it should be is kids need more of a choice at school and soda is not the cause of all the bad stuff. I always wonder, why can adults have soda at work but middle schoolers can’t have soda at school? That is unfair and that is why I think middle schoolers should be able to have soda at
