ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bombing

712 Words3 Pages

With a flash of light and a noise 15 times louder than thunder, the city is vaporized within seconds. But what has caused this to happen? A war, but what about the explosion? The answer is the devastating power of a nuclear bomb. They must be dismantled or decommissioned before humanity is eliminated. Nuclear warheads, more commonly known as Nukes, are classified as weapons of m ass destruction. This is because they have the capabilities to demolish an entire city, or something much larger. in some people's opinion, it's just another bomb. While the quote “The human race won't last to the end of the century, speaking as a mathematician, our odds are 3 to 1 against our survival.”[Bertrand Russell] which describes our survival chance against …show more content…

The second is the 3 kilometers that surround the hypocenter. The rest is known as the outskirts, the areas that will soon be destroyed by nuclear radiation. Anyone caught in the hypocenter has a 5% chance to survive. Anyone in the second zone has a 50% survival chance. Anyone in the outskirts has 80% survival chance.[ informative from MIFT] the quote “if WW3 is fought using nuclear weapons, than WW4 will be fought with bows and arrows”[Lord Luis Manhattan] describes that we will destroy ourselves with nukes and humanity will have to start over. I must admit to nuke supporters that nukes are a good way to intimidate other countries, but they should agree with me because i quote Gareth Owens that “we will destroy ourselves with nuclear weapons if they are used properly.” This quote is another proof that nukes are way to overpowered to be used in warfare. The second problem that involves nukes is there costliness. Nukes are very expensive weapons. There estimated cost is 1.8 billion dollars. That is more than the president's annual salary. The U.S. already suffers from an enormous national debt. Even yet, they continue to build these oversized nightmares. There is a quote that “in nuclear war all men are cremated equal”[unknown] which counters my opponent's opinion that Nukes are a good way to end a war. A nuclear war will be the mother of all wars, and it will only end with death. Now,

Show More
Related
1291 Words | 6 Pages

This book talks about when the United States almost started a full nuclear war because of a few soviet missiles flew into the states allegedly. They flew B-47s and B-52s as air fleets for 40 years of this international problem between the Soviet Union and the United States. In the year 1945 America ended World War 2, as the head nuclear power in the world. Even though the U.S. was the nuclear power, they did not have any nuclear bombs. The whole point of this “cold war” was to maintain a peace among uneasy times, which did not work.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Because atomic bombs lead to the end of the war, which will also lead to the peace time, people won’t die or injured by the

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

hydrogen bomb or H-bomb, weapon inferring an extensive bit of its vitality from the atomic combination of hydrogen isotopes. In a nuclear bomb, uranium or plutonium is part into lighter components that together weigh not exactly the first iotas, the rest of the mass showing up as vitality. Not at all like this splitting bomb, the hydrogen bomb capacities by the combination, or joining together, of lighter components into heavier components. The deciding item again weighs not as much as its parts, the distinction afresh showing up as vitality. Since to a great degree high temperatures are required with a specific end goal to start combination responses, the hydrogen bomb is otherwise called an atomic bomb.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6, 1945, An american B-29 bomber named Enola Gay which was piloted by Colonel Paul Tibbets dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb on a Japanese City called Hiroshima. The explosion wiped out 90% of the city and killed about 80,000 people. 10,000 people later died from radiation exposure. Hiroshima was 500 miles from Tokyo, was selected as the first target.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.

Read More
1345 Words | 6 Pages

Wyatt Short Professor Justice English 0804-L03 27 March 2017 Nuclear warfare came about during World War II, after Leo Szilard Germen scientist who studied chemistry, found out that there is a way to spilt an atom or combine the atom that causes a violent physics, decided to write Roosevelt a letter explaining Hitler might be on the verge of creating his own bomb that would give him a far greater lead in the war. They found out that splitting the nuclei or combining them creates a violent reaction In 1941 Franklin started to discover his own nuclear warfare. Even though the Nazis were close to have the power in their control, people think this type of warfare is a cruel and unusual punishment and should not be used in war, but

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

There are many reasons why the U.S. should not drop an atomic bomb on Japan, but a major one is it will have bad long term consequences. A telegram to the President of the U.S. from an American religious group states “The use of atomic bombs sets an extremely dangerous precedent for the future of mankind.” (Doc. K) This shows that if there was another war, it would end in an atomic bomb. If this happened, then there would be a lot more sadness and destruction, it would kill millions of innocent civilians that had nothing to do with the war.

Read More
1498 Words | 6 Pages

Atomic Bomb DBQ - Ben Fernandez Imagine waking up and getting ready for the day. Go walking on the way to work and a plane goes overhead. Looking up and see a small thing attached to a parachute get dropped from the plane. All the sudden the sky erupted in flames.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Dropping the bombs could one day lead to ending the world because of nuclear

Read More
1551 Words | 7 Pages

Yes, the Atomic bomb was tragic and had a lot of sorrow and loss but should be seen as something that prevented world havoc and caused even more destruction than what was already occurring. It also gives the countries that do have nuclear weapons a sense of security if a war were to break out since they can be used to defend their country or better yet end future wars all together. Also they have the highest form of national defense, nuclear weapons serve as a deterrence against all possible enemies. For more than 50

Read More
120 Words | 1 Pages

However, we can see in the upper classes, some kind of model or a goal to reach. It is normal to aspire of a better life and to look like what is impossible to achieve or to denigrate what one really is. That is what George Orwell wants to say in his autobriography entitled The Road to Wigan Pier (Doc A2), “it is in fact very difficult to escape, culturally, from the class into which you have born.” We can then implement any strategy to avoid looking like ours. This is what George Orwell is trying to show us in these examples like the millionaire who wants to improve his speech but it doesn't change who he really is.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Nuclear bombs is a sort of technology that would hurt the human race if released into the world more than once. As well as our technology use to “help” us, but instead gets rid of our focus in life and makes us lazy to do anything to the world or try to succeed in helping the world. Technology humans created would soon be our desintegration. Once again as Omar Bradley once told the world, we shouldn’t be arrogant or incoherent to continue with technology without the proper safety regulations that needs to be sent across the universe. Without the proper security humanity will soon perish with the use of our own

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

The world has avoided nuclear war until now, but what if that were to change? How many nuclear bombs would it take to eradicate humanity? The last time Nuclear weapons were used in war was in 1945, on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima & Nagasaki, at the end of WWII these bombs, dubbed Fat Man and Little Boy would be considered primitive by today's standards, and were actually two different types of bombs Little Boy, the explosive that destroyed Hiroshima was a uranium gun-type bomb which was detonated by firing one piece of sub-critical material into another triggering the nuclear reaction Fat Man was a plutonium implosion-type bomb which was triggered by essentially using smaller explosives to squeeze the bomb's plutonium core In terms of explosive power, Little Boy is estimated to have been between 12

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Others say we need them to defend ourselves against nuclear attack if we get attacked. But, if no country had bombs to begin with we wouldn’t have to worry about nuclear

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many incidents in which nuclear weapons were almost launched because of accidents and miscalculations. Many nuclear weapons have been taken apart and scrapped. Some countries got rid of them all together, but many countries still maintain their weapons. Nuclear weapons are bad for the environment Nuclear weapons have the capacity to destroy all complex life forms on Earth and its the only device ever created to do that. If only 0.1% of all nuclear weapon explosive would cause widespread famine and a agricultural collapse.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bombing

Related Topics

Open Document