In our world today the media has twisted and changed all news and this causes confusion among people researching a topic. Many readers are uneducated on a topic and when they read anything with knowing the credibility of a source, this begins a wildfire of misinformation. There has been a lot of debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid or are their scholarships enough College athletes should be paid due to the fact that they are making lots of money for their schools. The main point of the article is that there is a lot of controversy as to whether or not college athletes should be paid and it offered the pros and cons of paying these athletes. People that are familiar with college sports, because the article mentions names and deals that have occurred in college sports.regularly. “There are many advocates in favor of and many against the idea of paying athletes who play sports for their college or university.”(Should College Athletes be paid?). This shows who the intended audience is because not everyone is involved or familiar with this certain topic. First off this source is unbiased because it gives an equal number of points on the pros and cons on why college athletes should or …show more content…
The article states, ¨ The on-stage performers in a multimillion-dollar entertainment industry do, in fact, have value beyond athletic scholarships and small cost-of-school-attendance stipends.¨(This is how to Pay College Athletes).It states how they are bringing in all this money yet barely receive any compensation for creating all this revenue for their school. This source is credible because it cites all of its sources however the credibility can be questioned at times due to the poor and unacademic vocabulary, “ The biggest problem with this line of argument is that it is