ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

547 Words3 Pages

Atomic Bomb Thesis I personally believe that the idea of the atomic bombs being necessary to be used on Japan during WWII is completely wrong. I think this way because through the eyes of many soldiers and powerful leaders themselves, Japan was ready to surrender and couldn't continue to fight. The Japanese were willing to negotiate with the allies with certain conditions regarding their emperor. And finally, the bombs themselves weren't even dropped on any military bases or threats to the United States army and instead on cities in Japan. The dropping of the bomb didn't seem to be used as a military weapon but more of a psychological weapon. So no, the bomb was not needed in the defeat of Japan because they were already seen as defeated and …show more content…

The Japanese proposed the idea, “to surrender as long as assurance was given concerning the fate of the emperor.” Japan was ready to end the war knowing the security of their emperor. Instead of taking the agreement, the United States turned this down and instead gave the myth that the only way to end the war was to have an invasion or drop the bomb, a myth that carried on many years after the war, with American citizens not knowing the true story and believing what they did was their only option.
My final piece of evidence is how the bomb was dropped. We all know that the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and the second on Nagasaki. But were these two locations really necessary? The answer to that is no. Dropping the bomb on the innocent civilians did ultimately end the war but using these locations in the final decision had no purpose other than to bring fear to the Japanese people. The bomb could have been dropped on military bases or any sort of threat to the Americans that would have benefited them more if the Japanese decided to still retaliate or continue fighting. Once again, the bomb was used as a psychological move to also be shown to the Soviets so they know the power America holds. Japan was already defeated and only would have taken a matter of weeks for the war to be over but still insisted on dropping the devastating and inhumane bomb to the defenseless Japanese

Show More
Related

World War II DBQ

813 Words | 4 Pages

Even though dropping the bomb on Japan was controversial it was the only way to end this war. Following, like what Justice Chamber said: “How to defeat an enemy that could not, would not admit defeat?”(Doc 3), Japan was different than any other country that US faced because Japan committed inhuman and selfless actions just to kill more US

Read More

Ww2 Dbq Essay

522 Words | 3 Pages

If the war had not ended, "millions more Allied soldiers," would die, according to Ally Soldier William Guarnere in Document 6. If the bomb was not dropped, Allied soldiers would have to attack Tokyo, which would cause millions of casualties and continue the war. If the war continued and the soldiers attacked in Tokyo “casualties on both sides,” would have easily surpassed the number of deaths from the bomb, according to Bill Dietrich, a Seattle Times Reporter, in Document 7. America had to protect the lives of their soldiers, and they did so by dropping a bomb and ending a war. In short, the atomic bomb aided in the war ending and ultimately saved as many lives as it ended, therefore making it a necessary component for WWII.

Read More

World War 2 Dbq Essay

540 Words | 3 Pages

Leaders around the world still debate whether the atomic bomb was a necessity or not. It was a military necessity to drop the atomic bomb on hiroshima. The first reason is it ended the war quickly, and saved more lives in the end. Japan was very large and if the Americans invaded it, many of them would’ve died (Doc. E). So if they didn't drop the catastrophic bomb, more Americans would have died.

Read More

1988 Dbq Essay

496 Words | 2 Pages

Since the bomb was used it showed the world the mass destruction that can be caused so it could help prevent larger destruction. Document three was written by the secretary of war and states, “The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” which stopped the rest of the violence between the armies (Doc 3). Death is a part of all wars but the choice of the bomb also stopped further casualties because it stopped fire raids, strangling, blockades, and the overall clash between the two sides. These two quotes demonstrate why the atomic bomb should have been dropped on purpose because the purpose of these quotes was to put an end to the war. The next agreement is that some citizens believed that the bomb should not have been dropped and other measures should have been taken to end the war.

Read More

1945 Dbq Essay

791 Words | 4 Pages

The idea of the bomb being way too much regarding the situation was portrayed in Document 2, as it emphasized that Japan was at a disadvantage, so using the atomic bomb wasn’t important but rather harmful as it killed many without a reason. According to the document, it states, “The use of this barbaric weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a waste and did NOT assist our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender. . . .” This indicates that the bomb was useless to the war, as it didn’t contribute much to it but instead caused innocent people's deaths. Another reason why there were many against the bomb is that it was too cruel, and no matter what the action of dropping the bomb was, it broke many human rights.

Read More

Drop The Bomb Dbq

345 Words | 2 Pages

The dropping of the bombs were necessary and fair due to the refusal of the Japanese to surrender, the millions of lives saved by a quick end to the war, and the warnings given to the Japanese. To begin, the Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender. The author of Drop the Bomb as agreed by saying that “the Japanese have demonstrated a willingness to fight to the death”. During the war there were many times for the Japanese to surrender, but it was never done. With this in mind, they would have continued to drag out the war, which shows that dropping the bombs sped up the war which lessened the casualties.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

587 Words | 3 Pages

The atomic bombs that were dropped were a military necessity. Firstoff, the bombs justified the times of the war. For example, Pearl Harbor. On December 7, 1941 Japan raided Pearl Harbor. Prior to this, America could be explained as a sitting duck in the war.

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq

556 Words | 3 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the first and only time an atomic bomb was used. The bomb killed thousands of innocent Japanese civilians, and left few survivors. The Allies thought of using the bomb because it would instantly end the war, and it did, but at the cost of many innocent lives. The bomb was also used as a factor to demonstrate the power of the US, and was supposed to help push other countries out of several countries. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unnecessary because it gave little benefit to the Allies and led to thousands of innocent lives lost.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

567 Words | 3 Pages

It was a military necessity to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For starters, it was a war necessity to drop the atomic bomb was because it ended the war faster. It got them to surrender instead of continuing to fight. The atomic bomb was called, “ The Winning Weapon” because it forces the other country to surrender (OI). “We have used it to shorten the agony of the war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans” (Doc I).

Read More

Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq Essay

808 Words | 4 Pages

It was completely necessary for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Japan to end World War II. It’s still very controversial as to if this bomb really did limit the casualties that could would have occurred if the US didn’t drop the

Read More

To What Extent Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

687 Words | 3 Pages

First of all, in the case of the Americans the bomb was compared to the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Truman says in a press release, “We have used it against those who attacked without warning at Pearl Harbor, against those who have abandoned the pretense of obeying international laws of warfare” (Doc I). Second, the bombing of Pearl Harbor was an uncalled for action that was against the “laws of international warfare” and was rectified by the atomic bomb. The soldiers in Europe were extremely relieved that they would not have to invade, which would be a fatal battle where our soldiers would be shot at constantly and have bombs flying around them while they were rushing the beaches of Japan (Doc H). This bomb avoided the invasion of Japan which would have ended in an estimated 1.7 to 4 million casualties for the Allied powers (OI ladailypost.com).

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

898 Words | 4 Pages

The article states, “It achieved its primary objective of shortening the war.” (History on the Net 15) Dropping the bomb actually shortened the war, which also means there were less deaths compared to how many more there would have been if they did not drop the bomb, and the war may have gone on for much longer without the bomb. The article adds, “President Truman and the Allies issued a final ultimatum to Japan, known as the Potsdam Declaration” (History on the Net 19). The president and the Allied powers gave further warning about the bomb and even issued a final compromise, Japan still didn’t do anything and refused to cooperate, which forced the US to drop the atomic bomb on Japan.

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More

Analysis: Was The Atomic Bomb Necessary?

700 Words | 3 Pages

Was the Atomic Bomb Necessary? It was necessary for the United States to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. Truman’s decision to do this was because of the american lives, the Pearl Harbor in general, and bringing an end to it all. This all began when Japan attacked the Pearl Harbor and, for precautions, the U.S. Interned Japanese people here in our country.

Read More

Essay On The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

934 Words | 4 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs on World War II on the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very important part of World War II. The atomic bomb ended the war between America and Japan. This was just one of the important events during the battle in World War II. The Battle at Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese attacked U.S. soil was also why the americans bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some believe that the United States was correct in dropping these bombs on Japan because of the attack on Pearl Harbor while others believe that it was very wrong to dropped the bomb.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

Related Topics

Open Document