In the article, “Trump Defends Initial Remarks on Charlottesville; Again Blames Both Sides”, the author named Michael D. Shear starts with a chronological order of events that took place. The author brings up an effective statement about how President Donald Trump’s change of mind had been to deny any portrayal of condemning the white supremacist group of the Charlottesville Protest. Michael D. Shear points out that Trumps misleading statements could mean that he is taking a side even stating himself that he blames both sides and could potentially agitating many people. The main idea of this article consists the blame of President Trump’s improvised remarks towards the Charlottesville Protest. The two groups that had been reported in this situation were the white supremacists who opposed of the removal of Confederate monuments and the other group who were the counter-racist protestors. This occasion had been after the chaos caused by the clash of these two groups in an argument about the removal of the …show more content…
He uses credible sources and quotes by President Trump such as, “There was no way of making a correct statement that early”. This quote by Trump had been made to weaken the fire that he started with his improvised remarks and last minute speeches to try to correct his misleading statements. Many of the author’s quotes in this article had been mostly to prove how President Trumps lack of awareness and knowledge on this issue had always been his own fault, but also lacks courage to admit to his mistakes. Some of the other supporting statements by the author include, “Mr. Trump said his initial statement was shaped by a lack of information about the events in Charlottesville, even though television statements had been broadcasting images of the violence throughout the morning.” This statement by the author is portrayed as his criticism against President Trump and proving a flaw in his words during his speech