ipl-logo

Usa Pros And Cons

794 Words4 Pages

The Trump administration may think that United States (hereafter US) bases in the East Asian region is not mutually beneficial, but simply a parasitical relationship. Numbers, statistics, and data however, beg to disagree. Even from a logical standpoint of diplomacy, the US benefits a great deal by having its military bases in the region. The President-elect is considering the act of withdrawing our troops if these countries “don’t do their part” but political experts concur that these countries indeed do and exceeds what is expected of them. While there is a semblance of one-sided relationship wherein the US provides service, but receives nothing in return, the following paragraphs of facts and logic may convince the President-elect that having …show more content…

The US is one of the few countries who boast the capacity to have nuclear weapons, but ironically or not, is leaning towards decreasing it. It is one of the most prominent countries to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (hereafter NPT) in 1968 along with the other members of the so-called nuclear-weapon states (hereafter NWS) of China, Russia, France, and the United Kingdom. This treaty justifies and acknowledges the NWS’ legality of possessing nuclear weapons. While this may seem as a positive move towards non-proliferation, their main goal is to prevent other countries from possessing one themselves. This US-led treaty is to prevent possibly hostile nations from legally becoming a nuclear state that may change the status quo or threaten the P-5 (Permanent Five)’s dominance. The US has then taken a firm stance to prevent nuclear weapons from proliferating since President Richard Nixon and observed by succeeding American Presidents . Aside from the fact that changing our stance without preamble would be harshly criticized by the international community, the American people themselves are against proliferation. This unpopular stance will undoubtedly affect President-elect Trump’s …show more content…

There is only one moment in the Earth’s more than 4.5 billion years of existence that a nuclear weapon was utilized and it was during the Second World War by the US. We are the only known nation to mankind who have used this so-called weapon of mass destruction to another independent country. The effect was something that surprised even our scientists who invented it expected, totally obliterating the land, polluting the air, killing the people, and with its aftermaths bringing sickness to citizens who somehow survived, but latterly died in agony. With this knowledge, we say never, should this happen

Show More
Related

Ap Us Foreign Policy Dbq Essay

1094 Words | 5 Pages

In the aftermath of WWII, the US stood as one of the few powers relatively unharmed, as well as the sole nation in possession of nuclear weapons. This afforded the US a great degree of power and leadership in the world. However the USSR was another great power that managed to avoid much destruction from the war, and besides being ideologically opposed, matters were complicated after the USSR developed nuclear weapons for itself. This prompted the formulation of a new foreign policy. Document 7 states that the US “must organize and enlist the energies and resources of the free world in a positive program for peace which will frustrate the Kremlin design for world domination.”

Read More

America Pros And Cons To Be President

184 Words | 1 Pages

If trump gets elected into presidency his primary goal is to deport 11 million immigrant families that live on the U.S. Im not sure if he is talking about non US citizens or families that have expiring visas. He spoke them being forced out of their homes, jobs, and schools by the police at anytime. If he succeeds-which he won’t; there will be billions of dollars gone for his selfish request to supposedly “make America great again” but its people like him that make America what it is today . We as a nation are in debt for billion of dollars as it is , so if he is elected to be president then us as a nation are basically going in a downward spiral because we already owe trillions of dollars.

Read More

Summary Of From The Grass Roots To The Summit

1481 Words | 6 Pages

The US heavy-handedly pressured them to refrain from nuclear exports, specifically in the German-Brazilian deal. The US’ loud voice instilled the pact set forth in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. Until 1974 most nations had approached nuclear weapons and civilian uses of nuclear energy separately. Both sides in outlining their grievances towards each other often used article 4. “All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.”

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Return The United States

461 Words | 2 Pages

While Conservatives are those who abhor change, and want to return the United States to a time that they feel is ideal. This time seems to be debated, with many believing that the 1950’s was the ideal time that society should be returning to. While others believe, it is the 1980’s during the Reagan Era that was the ideal time for the American people. Liberals on the other hand, do not want to return the country back to a “better time”. They want the country to progress and change in a positive manner that includes the protection of rights and freedoms of everyone living within the United States.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

611 Words | 3 Pages

In an attempt to get Japan to surrender to the Allies, in August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the nation. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and the second on Nagasaki. Although these bombs did contribute to Japan’s surrender and the end of the war, the use of this atomic weapon was an irrational and horrible decision. The United States should have abstained from using the two atomic bombs on Japan for the sake of civilian lives and possible alternatives to their decision. These bombs not only had detrimental effects on Japan, they also led to an arms race amongst several nations.

Read More

1980 President Carter Persuasive Essay

1540 Words | 7 Pages

The spread of nuclear weapons is important because the United States can prevent any sort of nuclear conflict. Whether it is the US attacking another country, or another country attacking the US. After a group of Iranian students stormed the American embassy in Tehran, the US government was keeping a watchful eye on nuclear proliferation in the United States and in Iran. In January of 1979, Ronald Reagan was in Jacksonville when he made a statement regarding nuclear proliferation in the United States, “‘...Unilaterally the United States seems to be the only nation in the world that’s trying to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons.’” (Rafshoon

Read More

Should The United States Abolish Nuclear Weapons Dbq Essay

688 Words | 3 Pages

As said by Izhar Cohen, “the nuclear genie of how to make an an atomic bomb is out of the bottle, which means other nations or terrorists can obtain them and destabilize deterrence.” Izhar Cohen makes a point that the process of making an atomic bomb isn't a secret hence giving the U.S. another reason for them to keep their nuclear weapons. Because the process of making nuclear weapons is spreading, the U.S. needs to keep them for safety reasons. He also makes a point that terrorists could obtain them therefore making anyone without nuclear weapons an immediate target, giving the U.S. another reason to keep their nuclear

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Atoms For Peace

887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Lowther And Mcmahon

199 Words | 1 Pages

Blake Mcmahon and Adam Lowther look back to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, describe the destruction the bombing had caused, and acknowledge people’s concern regarding the danger of nuclear weapons. They counter the assumption of nuclear danger by asserting that if a country launch nuclear weapons it will spark deadly response from other nations. The nuclear characteristic of deterrent, they argued, is exemplified in the Cold War, in which the United States and the Soviet Union hindered themselves from the brink of war due to the horrific possibility of a nuclear war. Mcmahon and Lowther claim that nuclear weapons are still essential deterrents for the United States against countries that are developing nuclear weapons

Read More

Is President Trump's Pervasive Threat Of Conformity Regarding The Iran Nuclear Deal

577 Words | 3 Pages

An alternative level of analysis is the international system analysis. The author would have included the major powers’ uneasiness about the unrevealed decision of Trump because they are not sure if they would host nuclear weapons or build their own weaponry. This anxiety feeling indicates that the Trump administration has an alpha dog appeal amongst the members of the

Read More

Why Is The Atomic Bomb On Japan A Turning Point In American History

1551 Words | 7 Pages

Yes, the Atomic bomb was tragic and had a lot of sorrow and loss but should be seen as something that prevented world havoc and caused even more destruction than what was already occurring. It also gives the countries that do have nuclear weapons a sense of security if a war were to break out since they can be used to defend their country or better yet end future wars all together. Also they have the highest form of national defense, nuclear weapons serve as a deterrence against all possible enemies. For more than 50

Read More

There Will Come Soft Rains Technology Essay

466 Words | 2 Pages

Nuclear bombs is a sort of technology that would hurt the human race if released into the world more than once. As well as our technology use to “help” us, but instead gets rid of our focus in life and makes us lazy to do anything to the world or try to succeed in helping the world. Technology humans created would soon be our desintegration. Once again as Omar Bradley once told the world, we shouldn’t be arrogant or incoherent to continue with technology without the proper safety regulations that needs to be sent across the universe. Without the proper security humanity will soon perish with the use of our own

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of US Military Spending

735 Words | 3 Pages

North Korea who did sign NPT at first, withdrew and is building up its nuclear weapons and military. North Korea claims it hit the U.S. with its nuclear weapons, which puts some Americans at

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Banning The Atomic Bomb

862 Words | 4 Pages

Proliferation groups are trying to get the US to lead the way and destroying and disarming their atomic bombs in hopes that other countries will follow. Forster proposes these ideas in his own words. "The goal of the treaty is to "prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament."(Forster). The US cannot just say disarm your weapons and not do the same themselves. The US needs to take charge and start things themselves.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Should Nuclear Weapons Be Banned?

1172 Words | 5 Pages

Most nations equipped with nuclear weapons claim that they rely on them for strategic defense, and they are vulnerable to various attacks without these destructive weapons. Even with the high risk of destruction and devastation, they would prefer to keep nuclear bombs active and ready to go when necessary. Scrapping nuclear weapons would work to a nation’s disadvantage because various hostile states are covertly acquiring nuclear weapons in large number. If they dismantle nuclear bombs, they will be vulnerable to attacks (Matsui). The United States has many pacts that say if countries get rid of some of their weapons they will get rid of some of there

Read More

More about Usa Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document