Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abolitionist essay introduction
Abolitionist essay introduction
John Brown - contribution towards ending slavery
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
John Brown Hero or Villain The story of John Brown happened many years ago, yet it still puzzles historians today. John Brown was an anti-slave abolitionist who was put to death after pleading guilty of murder, but is he considered a hero or a villain? John Brown is a villain for three simple reason, he murdered many different people, he attacked a federal arsenal, and he could be considered a terrorist. The first reason John Brown is a villain is because he murdered many different people.
John Brown was the first violent abolitionist. He showed the the North was not afraid to physically fight for their beliefs. He became a martyr for the North
His father, Owen Brown, who was “a committed pacifist”, was passionately opposed to slavery, which heavily influenced John Brown to become an abolitionist (Horwitz, 2011, p.19). John Brown is described as “a warrior at heart”, who was focused on the task to “undermine slavery (Horwitz, 2011, p.19, 31). This obsession to terminate slavery was his inspiration throughout all the skirmishes he fought in and slaves he helped free. The most infamous battle was his raid on Harper’s Ferry, where he was captured, trialed, and later hung. This battle is believed to be a major
John Brown was a villain because he did all kinds of awful things just to lie through them, he committed treason to show slaves how to carry out the job, he unalived innocent people because they were pro - slavery, and almost started a civil war. John Brown has been a terrorist for two events in his life and killed people along the way. He is a villain because he killed people that were pro-slavery and didn’t have slaves. Everyone accomplishes an awful job by committing a crime to show slaves what to do and is not okay.
“I deny everything but what I have all along admitted, [...]” John Brown stated at his trial in 1859. John Brown was an abolitionist who attempted to end slavery, but his methods differed from most. Brown used violence to free slaves, and he was both loved and hated by people. He was a man of many titles: violence, lying, murder. It is a well-known question: Is John Brown a villain or a hero?
He was arrogant, and he thought he was invincible as long as the north supported him. John Brown should have been considered a terrorist, because he (in cold blood) murdered 5 people in a field, he led a revolt, and he armed
Many people either think John Brown was a terrorist or a freedom fighter. There are many facts to show both. I believe Brown was a freedom fighter. Evidence Brown was a freedom fighter and not a terrorist. John Brown wanted to fight against slave owners.
John Brown Essay The dictionary defines the word terrorist as “a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.” Some people describe the abolitionist John Brown as a terrorist. “Old John Brown” never aimed his actions at intimidating citizens, he tried to free slaves, not cause political unrest or intimidation. John Brown was a well-known abolitionist in the Bleeding Kansas time period.
John Brown DBQ The federal government tried to silence the people! Some people saw Mr. John Brown as a, “misguided fanatic,” however I disagree. Brown was a hero for this nation and a wake up call towards the god resented sin of slavery. One reason he was not a misguided fanatic was thoroughly explained in, “John Brown’s Speech.”
John Brown was a man with a strong hatred for slavery who tried to lead a rebellion against it. After this he was called a “misguided fanatic” by Abraham Lincoln. Which leaves the question, was John Brown a “misguided fanatic”? I think John Brown was a misguided fanatic, or according to dictionary.com a, mistaken person with an extreme, uncritical enthusiasm, because he was so set in his rebellion that his mind couldn’t be changed even when told his plan wouldn’t go well, and although he was told his actions would be fatal he went on to do so . In The Life and Times of Frederick Douglass, Douglass states that there was no changing Brown
John Brown was either a terrorist or a freedom fighter. He was a freedom fighter and there are many facts to prove it. Brown did anything he could to stop slavery. John Brown left a good impact on slavery. Even though he committed crimes he believed he was doing right.
In our opinion we believed that John Brown was a villian, but who was John Brown you ask ? Well he was only America’s first terrorist! John Brown was a writer born in Torrington Connecticut. He had twenty kids and only eleven survied in adulthood and I’ll tell you what happen to some of them and why they didn’t survive to adulthood. John brown was invovled in a couple of terrorist attacks .
He donated lots of money to people and places and charities that needed it the most . This would be one reason why someone would think he is heroic. Many people would not really see this heroic because he was a wealthy man he had a lot more money than what he donated. Yes he did donate a good portion of his money but people
Looking at what he has fought for, it’s no doubt that he fought for a noble cause which is the freedom of slavery. John Brown shouldn’t be known as hero or terrorists because of want he has done applies to both sides. John Brown shouldn’t be known as a terrorist or a national hero because of his violent attack and raids. After, September 11, 2001 John Brown has been called a terrorist which has caused controversy about Brown’s legacy and reputation. Furthermore, in the article, The 9/11 of 1859 says, “He led 21 men all but two in their 20s, and many of them radicalized by guerilla fighting in Bleeding Kansas, the abolitionists’ Afghanistan”(Horowitz).
Through his writings, Brown tells us he had no doubt in his intentions being for the better, choosing to ignore these lives lost as they didn’t serve to further his cause. Scott John Hammond tell us about John Brown’s calculated nature by comparing him to Machiavellian philosophies, a philosophy associated with the use of power in often ruthless means, “Given the fact that all founders and reformers will inevitably encounter resistance from those enemies … Machiavelli notes that a lawgiver … must go forth armed and prepared for struggle” and “A founder is consonant with the idea of virtue, or grandeur of soul - a character of extraordinary proportions, defined in terms of “ingenuity, skill, and excellence.”