ipl-logo

What Is John Locke's Loss Of Independence

893 Words4 Pages

1) When Locke says each person by nature is independent he meant that all humans are born free and equal, that no one has power over another. He believes that our natural rights can’t be taken away from us because we are born with it. He states that we “are free to do as we please”; we are born with “life, liberty and property.” However, he states that a natural right is different from license. We have the power to carry out these natural rights but if one commits a crime in a foreign country they can and will be punished for it. Locke believes by nature the crime should fit the punishment.
2) The loss of independence that Locke is concerned with is giving up those natural rights. When independence is taking away from one individual to increase …show more content…

The point of giving up power to society is to preserved independence and to protect it from unfairness. In order for this society to work, there are laws in which we must obey and depend on.
5) The Lockean solution is not perfect because he believed that those who have the most power and wealth also benefit from those who have the least power and wealth. This contradicts the idea of equality and fairness in distribution of power and wealth.
6) Rawls interpretation of independence by nature is that each person is born with certain rights but these rights are unevenly distributed. He believes the purpose of society is to redistribute resources so it can provide an equal opportunity for all.
7) Rawls main concern is the inequality between the advantages and disadvantages. That there are different biases. The advantages by birth know their advantages are morally arbitrary and that they are willing to make them fair by division of labor.
8) The cause of this loss of independence is the different biases we all have. We tend to make decisions that would benefit people like us rather than help others that are different from us. Rawls is more concerned with the well-being and happiness of an individual but the different social powers prevents us from achieving equality of

Open Document