ipl-logo

What Is Military's Unbalanced Power

543 Words3 Pages

Throughout history, a military stands vital to protect a country in the event of an invasion. With the newly created Atomic Bomb, destruction and warfare enters a whole new light. The Atomic Bomb creates an unbalanced power, allowing one country to strike the other country with greater force than ever seen before. Albert Einstein and Dwight D. Eisenhower, the geniuses of their time, adopt varying views on the state of military in peacetime. Dwight D. Eisenhower states that military needs to stay always present so power stays balanced. In the problem of the country’s safety, Einstein adopted the view in the country’s best interests. Military becomes un-needed once all simply give up their weapons, and learn to live cooperatively. Albert Einstein states that this unbalance of power creates fear and “bully” countries. Although Eisenhower’s claim that military superiority stands essential for safety contains validity, if weaponry continues to advance at the current rate, there will be drastic repercussions. One of the most evident costs of military advancement resides as funds simply running out. If a country no longer contains enough money to run the military programs, then it allows a major unbalanced power. This creates a heightened opportunity of war, threatening the security of the other countries. If the imbalanced power …show more content…

This means that if all of the countries came together to cooperate, conflict stands easily avoided. A “Worldwide Cooperation” allows countries to really talk it out and help each other to reach a goal. This would keep each country in its respective place, and avoid major war. This plan prevent the need for a military in the first place, and it creates a balance in power. If one country decides to split and attempt to take over another country, the whole rest of the world has the little bullied country’s back. This plan stops conflicts, and promotes the idea of unnecessary nuclear

Show More
Related
127 Words | 1 Pages

In the book, Bomb: The Race to Build -And Steal- The World’s Most Dangerous Weapon (2012), American author, Steve Sheinkin, addresses the topic of power and summarizes that the fight for superiority among the countries continues to destroy our world, by elucidating the mass destruction and brutal fatalities the war has caused. Sheinkin supports his assertion by using disturbing imagery and details while describing the people in the Hiroshima bombing and how burnt, swollen, and blackened their skin was. The author’s overall purpose is to inform readers of historical non-fiction so that they will be aware of the damage that can be caused by war and power. Sheinkin establishes an alarmed tone in order to appeal to his audience’s morals and encourage

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

This document conveys that the Japanese wouldn’t back down after multiple warnings, instead they were getting stronger, and therefore the atomic bombs were justified because they were given fair warnings that they did not take it

Read More
1609 Words | 7 Pages

Safety and security has gone back to members we used to call the “watchman” who were some of the first figures we started to develop as law enforcement figures to keep the society safe (Schmalleger 6). This is so important in today 's world as it tries to sure up fairness for life, land, and the pursuit of happiness, as it states in the United States’ Declaration of independence. This is such an important concept to have in our society as the US became somewhat of a model for the rest of the world after our declaration. This need for safety and security also stretches into the reasons for why we have our military. For obvious reason as keeping our country safe to the reasons of us still interacting in other countries to allow them and their people work towards having a fair system of which they can feel safe and secure.

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

Fleet Marine Force Manual 1 stated, ‘War is both timeless and ever changing. While the basic nature of war is constant, the means and methods we use evolve continuously.’ These words clearly states that war by itself is simple and very good known to humanity but the approaches what have been used is developing year by year. To understand how long could last age of war and could it end one day we should understand the sense of war and main causes, to avoid creation of fertile soil for hostilities in the future. Moreover there is different ways how to get desired result by the well-developed states avoiding to be involved in military conflict with another state.

Read More
4062 Words | 17 Pages

Brodie, B. (1946). The Absolute Weapon. Connecticut, New Haven. Yale Institute of International Studies.

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

The stated goal of the Iran Deal as laid out by the JCPOA is to both prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and to attempt to change Iran’s fundamental approach to the issue (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, 2016). Therefore, the primary goal of the nuclear agreement is to extend Iran’s breakout capacity; that is the time required to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon (Heinonen, 2016). Toward this end, the plan places physical limitations on Iran’s nuclear capabilities, so as to close off what the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) sees as the three potential routes to a nuclear weapon: the plutonium, Uranium, and covert routes. Blocking the first two routes involves modifying or incapacitating existing nuclear

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

There are many advantages as well as disadvantages to launching a preemptive military strike. The advantages of a preemptive military strike are; to use this as a scare tactic, to portray that the United States is willing to use force. Therefore, will boost the United Sates’ power, as follows reinforcing their reputation. Aforementioned, after reaching to the top, this will urge them to succumb. An example of a comparable case, is when the United States dropped a bomb on two cities in Japan, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which took place in 1945, after Japan deliberately kept on fighting and did not stop.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

The Church believes that it is nuclear disarmament, not nuclear deterrence, that is a long term basis for

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

Opponents may argue that, the need for these advances for protection against foreign enemies or nations is vital. If enemy nations strike, we must strike back; this is not wrong for it is not preemptive war, it is to defend our own, but how can we win if we do not prepare? There are no rules to war; we must simply fight to defend what is ours. Admittedly, preparation is vital, but what opponents fail to take into account is that there is always an alternative. Opponents fail to see that to defend our own and hurt our enemy, we are hurting our own, and dehumanizing them.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

Countries make the key decisions concerned with nuclear, Most countries have chosen to forgo nuclear weapons, and have complied with their commitments under the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty). The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

The Costs of War Are the Engineering of Weapons In these days now, America, is sitting on debt with which they owe other countries their money, but America seems to have a large and well equipped military. Why is that, one may ask? In my opinion, one would need three things to assure victory. The first thing is the intelligence to lead your troops, second is having large sums of money, and last would be to get and keep people’s support.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

However, when history is reviewed, deterrence has not worked so well. The bipolar simplicity of Cold war, strong command and control systems, and the threat of mutual nuclear annihilation showed the extreme cases of deterrence. Deterrence proved just to work well during the Cold war as opposed to after it. Its ineffective nature could be because of getting involved in conflict that we could actually avoid. An example is Yugoslavia.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

While some may think that the nations of the world have become much more intelligent and diplomatic since the end of the Cold War; there is evidence that proves otherwise. During the Cold War children were taught to hide under a desk so that they would be protected from a nuclear bomb; this fear of nuclear fallout was valid since this weaponry effects both combatants and none combatants. However, nuclear weapons have only been used several times, due to the immediate and long term effects that this action could have on the targeted nation, its enemy, and the rest of the world. With this concern attached to this decision, there could be very few justifiable situations to utilize the nuclear option.

Read More
1871 Words | 8 Pages

But now the risks of nuclear weapons are considered to be higher than the benefits they bring for nuclear weapon holders. President Obama referred to the potential for a terrorist to get a nuclear weapon as "the most immediate and extreme threat to global security." (Prague, April 2009). There are three kinds of efforts needed to diminish nuclear risks and they are firstly to deterring and preventing states and non-state actors from acquiring nuclear weapons. Secondly use nuclear arms control to reduce the threat that nuclear weapons and nuclear material pose worldwide and finally creating a peaceful nuclear energy fuel cycle to lower risks of misusing nuclear

Read More
1076 Words | 5 Pages

The best solution for this fear is disarmament. A world free of nuclear weapons is what we need to implement for the sake of humanity. However, achieving this goal is not that easy. Disarmament remains only an aspiration despite a

Read More

More about What Is Military's Unbalanced Power

Related Topics

Open Document