Why Did No Child Left Behind Fail

822 Words4 Pages

No Child Left Behind was created to help children reach proficiency in all subjects. George Bush signed it into law in 2000. Since then the goal has been to reach 100% proficiency by 2013-2014. That goal was not met and No Child Left Behind was replaced in 2015 by the Every Student Succeeds Act. The reason people have not liked No Child Left Behind act is because it mostly focuses on testing and test prep. It has created the Common Core which leaves the fine art courses behind and subjects like social studies and family consumer classes. People who have liked No Child Left behind have liked it because it has helped children who are in low-income classes get more help. It has helped minorities get noticed and flourish in subjects that these …show more content…

I give the class a brief summary of No Child Left Behind and the beliefs each side has. I asked the question on why do these low income schools still fail? One student in the class said that No Child Left Behind was trying to fix things and make the educations system here in America look better than it actually it is. The result of doing this has lead this learning to be meaningless, and is hard to teach and learn these subjects. A different student said that No Child Left Behind had nothing to do with it but the funding was an issue.The teachers that are that these schools do not want to be at these low-income school’s teaching.The teachers are not being paid enough. These students usually have a low income family and have stressful home lives which impact their learning. These issues can not be solved with education reform. I asked the question what is the root reason for these schools not reaching 100% proficiency. One student said parents are not able to help with these subjects when the child comes home from school and has a question. One other student said “what is it worth when the student is not getting it”. An another student said it was because “there is not emphasize on homework especially here in Carlisle”. “ A lot of math is reption and homework is one of the ways you are able to grab that concept and when homework is worth nothing what is the point. If you can’t understand the subject and it is not …show more content…

I thought of the solution would it help students if there was different groups that the student can go to that would be more focus on that child. Also the federal government would stop counting subgroups so it wouldn't hurt anymore children. One student said there would be too many subgroups and how fast teachers pull out a lesson. They believe that teachers would try to pull out lessons quicker to children. These lessons would never slow down. I thought when I brought up these solution it would please both sides but it doesn't. Another solution I thought of was less about testing and of course you would still have test but we wouldn't measure children on these test but to see where they were at. Every body agreed with this solution. One student said not every child can’t start and end at the same place. Children learn at different rates. A student said that we could start to individualized teaching to that student which would help children so they were not so alone. This would help students who were quick to learn and one who learn different