Reggio Emilia Essays

The Reggio Emilia Theory and Philosophy is an approach to early childhood education based on the belief that children are capable and competent, and that they are naturally driven to explore, create and learn. It was developed in the 1940s in the town of Reggio Emilia, Italy, and is based on the educational principles of the Italian educator and philosopher Loris Malaguzzi. Reggio Emilia's philosophy of education is based on the idea that children learn best in a stimulating and supportive environment

may think of children ages four to six starting in a school and learning new engaging things. The Reggio Emilia philosophy is a path to teaching, learning, and an advocacy for children (Harth). The Reggio Emilia approach was founded by the visionary teacher and humanitarian, Loris Malaguzzi; the approach she founded refers to the philosophy of early childhood education that originated in Reggio Emilia, Italy (NAEYC). “This unique approach to education begins with a particular and strong image of children

The Reggio Emilia approach is currently used to support arts and literacies in an early childhood setting. It is an experimental and motivating approach which sees children as potential, resourceful and capable (Arthur, Beecher, et al., 2008). Arthur, Beecher, et al., (2208) described that in this approach children, as social beings, construct their own learning controlled by their interests. Since relationship is one of its main aspects, therefore it is established between educators, children and

Observation and Documentation are key elements in the Reggio Emilia Approach. Play is the work of the child, and teachers take on many roles within the classroom in the Reggio Emilia project approach. Teachers serve as observers, facilitators, they also document and plan new curriculum based on observations. The teacher and child are partners in learning. The relationship between the teacher and child last over a three year span; this longevity is great for building social and emotional development

Reggio Emilia philosophy and approach has developed and continues to develop as a result of over 40 years of experience. Formed in Reggio Emilia, Italy by Loris Malaguzzi, (educator, philosopher and innovator in education), designed as an educational model based on the relationship between children, relationship with family and teachers. This system of education was done after studying Dewey, Piaget and Vygotski. It is a philosophy that emphasizes child, documentaries, emergent curriculum, respect

In Reggio Emilia approach, there are many strengths as it supports children that a child’s image is viewed as having rights and not just needs and child has been viewed as beautiful, competent, powerful, curious, creative as well as full of ambitious desires and potentials. In addition, it supports children’s individual differences and needs, documentation that Reggio teachers collect about their students and a mix of long- and short term projects which provide students with a deeper understanding

Critical reflection on two approaches – Reggio Emilia Approach and Forest School Approach Reggio Emilia Approach Reggio Emilia Approach is an educational philosophy which considers children as capable, innovative and curious learners with intrinsic motivations in learning about the unknowns surrounding them (Mitchell and Carroll, 2003). It aimed to promote children’s learning through the development of “the hundred languages” of children (Edwards, Gandini and Forma, 2012). Features Learning spaces

Based in the NAEYC standers: Reggio Emilia approach supports a Child Approach in that a child’s image is viewed as having rights and not just needs, child has been viewed as beautiful, competent, powerful, curious, creative as well as full of ambitious desires and potentials, supports children’s individual differences and needs, documentation that Reggio teachers collect about their students, and mix of long- and short term projects which provide students with a deeper understanding of the subject

Reggio Emilia links into my key issues because the Reggio Emilia approach focuses on the child learning through doing. For example, a child might paint a picture for their mums or dads. Also, it links into my key issues with the environment as the practitioners would set up the environment which will encourage children to communicate between children and adults. The practitioner will also create different areas to stimulate the child’s imagination. This is important for young children as they are

The current framework is the EYFS (Early Years Foundation Stage) which states that working with parents and other professional is essential and has an impact on a practitioners practice. The parents know their child the best therefore it is important to communicate with them in order to find out the child’s interest and dislikes. As he EYFS states in the article 3.68, “Providers must maintain records and obtain and share information to ensure the safe and efficient management of the setting, and

what type of teacher I would like to become. Finding a partnership that best represents the way I want to teach. Three I am having to look at are as follows Reggio Emilia, Head Start, and the Comer model. I hope by the end of this essay to have some idea of what works the best for me and how I will teach. The first look is at the Reggio Emilia program. Started after World War 2 by a group of parents in Italy wanting

Preschool curriculums are programmed to help children achieve formal school readiness in all areas of academic and social learning. This includes exploration and discovery to encourage active participation among children, which broadens their horizons and expands their skills and knowledge. The meaningful experiences gained will empower young learners to grow confidently and successfully to prepare them mentally for the next phase of education. It is critical as a drastic transition can affect one’s

Reflective Journals There are two models that I have learned from class, which are the Reggio Emilia approach and the Montessori approach. There are both successful educational approach on early childhood education in different purpose. The Reggio Emilia approach is placing the children to focus on natural leaning, inspiring learning and learning based on their interests. The Montessori approach is placing the children in a “well-planned and structured environment which will meet their individual

Introduction Age itself cannot cause development. Indeed, developmental change runs parallel with chorological age due to genetic factors and environmental factors. Genetic factors play a vital role of overall growth such as changes in proportion of body and brain parts. Environmental factors could be diet and disease exposure, social, emotional and cognitive experiences. Development may not be constant, it might be different from person to person. In this assignment, I have selected for major developmental

The questions posted in the article with the interview with Brenda Fyfe, were catered towards the Reggio-Emilio Approach, based on parts of an essay by Carlina Rinaldi, ‘Documentation and Assessment: What is the Relationship?’, from Making Learning Visible: Children as Individual and Group Learners. Fyfe shed light on many points and processes that were enlightening to me. The process of Reggio-Emilio has always intrigued me but has since eluded my observations, in that for a practice embraced by

Introduction: Theatre of the Oppressed was first elaborated in the 1960’s by a Brazilian named Augusto Boal, he was raised in Rio de Janeiro and then attended a Colombian university. Upon completion of his studies he returned to Brazil, he abandoned his studied academic career and began working in the Arena Theatre near his new home in São Paulo. Boal and his team initially began in Brazil and transferred later across to Europe where they used theatre as a medium to overcome oppression in people’s

Everyone sees the play Hamlet as this great tragedy and a quest for revenge, and it is one, but it’s all filled with so much deception and lies. The characters lie to each other, they spy and create plans to find out information. This use of hidden yet obvious deception just shows how rotton human beings can be with each other and how easily they can turn on one another to further themselves to get what they want. It eventually shows that by using all your energy towards a plan of revenge, can cause

frequently, the play is focused on Iago trying to plot his plan as the play goes on, his intentions are to get revenge on Othello for one not promoting him to lieutenant and believing that Othello slept with his wife Emilia. For that Iago manipulates Othello 's wife Desdemona, Roderigo, Emilia and Cassio. Iago commits the greater wrong, for being manipulative, deceivious, and betraying. Iago and Othello are both main characters who have their way of making trouble, some would say Othello commits more wrong

betrayal acts as impetus for the play, ultimately leading to the downfall of Othello and everyone he holds dearest to him. Though there are many characters in the play, it is only necessary to hone in on five: Othello, Iago, Desdemona, Cassio, and Emilia. As mentioned before, Othello is the black army general, and he starts off the play being the undisputable protagonist.

The story of Hamlet by William Shakespeare is a story of betrayal, revenge, and intrigue. Hamlet, the title character discovers that his uncle killed his father and married his mother effectively stealing the throne. Hamlet decides he must kill his uncle Claudius as revenge for what he had done. However, as the new king, Hamlet isn't sure how to get to him, so he decides to fake madness, but his plan backfires as Claudius doesn't trust him and makes sure he is always watched. In his fumbled plan