ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

970 Words4 Pages

After Tim Tebow set records in the National Football League, won championships, and brought in millions of dollars to the school, staff, coaches, and athletic department, Tebow went home with nothing. An average of seventy million people watch college sports every year. Now imagine how much money is put into college sports each year. None of this money goes to the athletes that make the game happen. While none of these athletes receive payment for their hard work on the field or court, nine football coaches will be paid at least a total of a million dollars in compensation each year (Eitzen). This is one of the many reason why college athletes should receive a stipend from the school they play for.
For years, college athletes have gone unpaid …show more content…

Many people do not realize that a “full” scholarship does not always cover the whole of tuition or living expenses (Meshefejian). Because of their overwhelming schedule with sports and trying to maintain a passing grade to stay in school, many are unable to find a job (Birkenes and Bagaria). The average American full-time job is forty hours a week. The average player in a Division One school spends over forty hours a week on their game, which means they work more than a full-time employee who is paid ("Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid"). Students have no time to get a job because of the extraneous workload their sport puts on …show more content…

The payment of athletes would not affect many of these excuses opposers give. Colleges often sign deals with big brand name companies to sponsor a new sports facility that the company pays for. The University of Colorado named its basketball arena the Coors Event Center in return for a $5,000,000 donation (Eitzen). The year Boston College’s quarterback won a Heisman brought the enrollment rate up 25 points in one year . They say it would take away from the payment of staff at the university, but places like Alabama and Texas pay their head football coaches $5 million a year ("Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid."). These students are the reason tickets sales, endorsement deals, school enrollment, and other things make such a nice profit

Show More
Related
796 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes have been huge in America since the early 1900s. With the emergence of social media the prevalence of college sports have increased further. There have been numerous scandals across college sports for athletes taking money for signing objects. This brings up the highly controversial debate over whether or not these athletes should be paid. Tyson Harnett addresses this topic in “Why college Athletes Should Be Paid<” when he takes a side and provides examples as a former collegiate athlete.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

What a lot of people do not realize is that a college sport is just the same a pro sport but with students. Playing a collegiate sport requires a lot of time and effort from a student. Athletes, spend on average, 43+ hours training or playing their sport. People, at most, work 40 hours a week. Athletes do not have time for a job but some are expected to be able to pay for food or expenses they might have such as, uniform fees, equipment fees, and all others that may apply.

Read More
1283 Words | 6 Pages

Dalton Collins Berthot English III 2/24/2017 College Athletes Should Not Be Paid College athletes are given scholarships to cover their tuition and other expenses in college, so should they be paid a salary for their athletic performances as well? They are receiving something far more valuable than a chance to play college ball. They are receiving an education that will provide for them and last a lifetime. College athletes should not be paid to perform on the field or the court. Whether college athletes should be paid or not is a topic that is debated more and more these days.

Read More
2091 Words | 9 Pages

Athletes risk potentially debilitating effects to their personal lives by playing collegiate sports, according to Grand Canyon University’s article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” This problem leads to many people wondering why collegiate athletes still play sports. In the article “The Effects of Compensation for NCAA Athletes” by Mykel Kinard, he explains how the NCAA has been pocketing billions of dollars and profiting off of athletes’ NIL without allowing athletes to legally receive compensation for decades. Another reason athlete compensation is in question is because of how it’s power used to be abused. For example, in 2018, Deandre Ayton, a five-star recruit, accepted a scholarship to play at The University of Arizona.

Read More
2239 Words | 9 Pages

College athletes don’t need ten thousand dollars or even five thousand dollars. If all college athletes only got paid two thousand dollars for one semester they could actually have money to spend. Also they would have a little money so they can start putting it away in

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

Athletes put in so much time and effort and generate huge amounts of money that it is only right to grant them pay. When playing college sports there's usually no time in between to have a job because the athletes are either practicing, exercising or at school. According to CNN, players devote 14 hours a day to football related activity. It consists from 8:30 AM to 10:30 PM ( CNNMoney) . In the offseason the athletes practice

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

College athletics in the United States has long been a source of pride and revenue for many universities. These athletes have profoundly impacted the world, captivating audiences worldwide and fostering a sense of unity and excitement among fans. However, the issue of whether college athletes should be paid has been a topic of heated debate. Contrary to the stance of the NCAA(National Collegiate Athletics Association), college athletes deserve compensation for their contributions to the multi-billion-dollar industry of collegiate sports, as their talents and efforts generate substantial revenue for their universities. These individuals often face financial hardships, often lack the time for part-time work and struggle with the restrictions

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

There is no free tuition for life. I believe that college athletes practice and play as if it is their job to do so, shouldn’t they be paid for

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

However, these schools are putting this money back into the programs that gained them the money("Crossfire: Hypocritical Not to Pay College Athletes?"). Another argument is that the athletes are the workhorse of the universities and deserve to be paid as they provide the profits is almost entirely false. From 1998-2008 only 6 universities made consistent profits as well as 6 more universities only making profits part of the time and the rest not making a profit most of the time("Lewis, Michael, and Bob Williams."). Also. it’s not a common thread to have the school consistently gaining money.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

College is a place for students to obtain a college degree and help them to get ahead on their “real world” careers. Athletic departments in college have become huge money incomes in the past ten years; college football and basketball are even shown on the television. This has resulted in many believing these athletes deserve to be paid for their contribution to the schools athletic income. However athletes in college are given the opportunity to play the sport that they love as well as receive a top education. For some players a $20,000+ per year tuition is not enough, they want to be paid with more than just a scholarship.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

While coaches just stand and yell for millions of dollars, athletes are risking their bodies for entertainment. This article “Should College Athletes be Paid?”, was written by Josslyn Howard to see if college athletes are getting what they deserve. She says, “NCAA president Mark Emmert rolled in $1.9 million in 2014, yet the students that are generating that revenue are not making a dime” (Howard). If the college athletes get paid, they will not have to worry about getting hurt in a game. If an athlete gets a career ending injury, they will have at least a little bit of money to support themselves.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

Alex Rizk wrote in, “Should College Athletes Be Paid to Play?” that football scholarship players already received many helps and that they don’t need to pay college athletes to

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

Many people know or have heard about college coaches and college programs getting a lot of money after each game, in 2019 the NCAA total athletic revenue among all of the athletic departments was 18.9 billion dollars. In 2020 U.S. Congressman Mark Walker set out a bill about college athletes getting paid for their names, images, and likeness and he wished that it would be voted on in 2020 and that in 2021 it might go into effect. In the article “NCAA clears the way for athletes to profit from names, images and likenesses” Mark Walker States “ college athletes should get profit off of their names and image and likenesses because athletic programs wouldn’t have to pay so much to them and he also states that the program they play for should pay them 1,000 dollars each month to keep the players interest high. Given this evidence, it can be seen that letting college players get paid off of their names and image and likenesses would benefit them because they wouldn’t have to worry about getting another job or struggle with money problems if the NCAA would pay them 1,000 dollars each month and that could also help the program out because they wouldn’t have to worry about paying them after each game. This Proves my claim because the NCAA is paid around 18.9 billion dollars each year from the athletic department and none of that goes to the athletes that they have put their bodies on the line for the program each game and each practice and that’s unfair to them because they work so hard outside of practice and games they don’t want to worry about not having money, so when Mark Walker said that the NCAA should pay the athletes 1,000 dollars each month he is right.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document