ipl-logo

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

613 Words3 Pages

Whenever the harms and benefits of animal testing have been raised, the responses always seem to be controversial as people are divided between standing up for animal health and safety of humans. Animal testing is inhumane and cruel as they are different from humans making animals poor test subjects. Furthermore, tests on animals do not usually succeed as they are executed. Although, cosmetic companies and doctors say animal testing contributes to life saving cures and treatments.
Public misconceptions of animal testing being linked with the death of millions of animals is certainly starting a war between scientists with different perspectives on animal testing as some scientists view testing as a positive. They say it assists many animals in more ways than one could ever imagine. Animal testing is contributing to human health as humans have survived many medical treatments due to direct usage of animals. The discovery of insulin, which helps diabetics, is made from the removal of dog pancreases. Moreover, the polio vaccine …show more content…

(ProCon.org, Nov 2, 2017) Animal testing is an experiment in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that will likely cause them pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm and if extremely unlucky they will be killed at the end of the experiment. (crueltyfreeinternational.org, March 2, 2018)
Animal testing is vital to both humans and animals as without animal research, millions of dogs, cats, birds and farm animals would be dead from more than 200 diseases, which include rabies, feline leukaemia. Today these diseases are preventable due to the vaccines developed in animal research. Furthermore, the research also enabled for the development of vaccinations against smallpox, measles and mumps and this ultimately leads to both species being cured (Consunji, T,

Open Document