Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

Animal testing first began in 500 B.C. in Ancient Greece. This event was considered normal because back then, because using animals for the knowledge of how to use different mechanisms and the function of living things. It has been the standard to use animals to test the harmfulness of basic everyday things we use. Using animals as a test is used as practice for biology and medicine which has been happening to more than 50 million animals each year. Animal testing affects animals, humans, and the environment in numerous ways. Animal testing should be stopped because not only is it harmful to the millions of animals being tested, but along with humans and the environment.
Animal testing is very harmful for the many animals being tested each

Air pollution is huge due to the gasses from the incarceration of animal carcasses and lab supplies that hold all kinds of toxins. Incarceration is the most toxic to the environment, and is proven harmful to human health, chronic illness, and developmental delays. According to ‘Faunalytics’, “Globally, up to 126.9 million non-human vertebrate animals are bred, used, and disposed of in the drug, medical, chemical, cosmetic, and household product industries. As in the farmed animal industry, this mass use of animals as resources raises serious environmental impact concerns.” Due to the continuous testing of animals, studies have proven that animal testing causes harm to the environment.” Though there are many things pointing towards how animal testing should be banned, there are people who support these

We use them to make sure nothing could possibly hurt us, and instead of risking human lives, we use different animals to make sure a product is safe. According to ‘Teen Opinions Matter’, “Finding alternatives to testing on animals can be a difficult task. It is unethical to conduct experiments on human subjects due to the unknown health risks involved. One example of an experiment on humans that went wrong is an experiment conducted by Johns Hopkins University in 2001.” However, this is wrong. We should not be using animals to test any sort of medicine or product when we have other alternatives such as In Vitro Testing, Computer Modeling, and Human-Patient Simulators. According to ‘InVitroInternational’ alternatives can be more accurate, “The results of animal testing may not always apply to human health. Research on mice, rats, guinea pigs, hamsters, and monkeys did not reveal a link between glass fibers and cancer, according to the New England Anti-Vivisection Society, so the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) labeled glass fibers as carcinogenic only after human studies established the link.” Non-animal testing is also better for the environment, “This is especially true in toxicity testing, where researchers breed, test and then dispose of millions of test animals, which are classified as hazardous or pathogenic waste. Alternatives to animal testing are less