ipl-logo

Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

386 Words2 Pages

Have you ever wondered how the world comes up with the newest beauty product or the cure to the latest disease? These are found through experimenting on living creatures for multitudes of time. This animal testing is unacceptable because it’s unnecessary, unethical and unscientific.
It’s unnecessary to test because what works on them does not work on humans. Former director of the National Cancer Institute Dr. Richard Klausner states “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades—and it simply didn't work in humans”. Treating a disease in an animal doesn’t guarantee it will be cured in humans. It wastes money, resources, and time to fund animal experiments when they …show more content…

The Humane Society lists a variety of what happens such as “Forced chemical exposure in toxicity testing..exposure to drugs, chemicals or infectious disease at levels that cause illness, pain and distress, or death..genetic manipulation..ear-notching and tail-clipping for identification..food and water deprivation..infliction of wounds, burns and other injuries to study healing”. These horrendous conditions are not worth the little help testing brings. The severe pain it brings to creatures is unethical.
It’s unscientific to test on animals because the entire science behind it is wrong. “90% of drugs fail in human trials despite promising results in animal tests – whether on safety grounds or because they do not work” (Cruelty Free International). The results from experimenting are inaccurate and unhelpful. It makes no scientific sense to test on animals.
Many claim animal testing helps people understand diseases better yet this simply isn’t true. “Of over 1,000 potential stroke treatments that had been ‘successful’ in animal tests, only approximately 10% progressed to human trials. None worked sufficiently well in humans” (Cruelty Free International). Animal testing rarely works in favor for humans. It helps nothing to test on

Show More
Related
724 Words | 3 Pages

Test on animals may not work on humans. 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fails on human clinical trials. When they test drugs on animals and it works, most of the time it won’t work on humans. Tests on animals are flawed. 87% of the studies on rodents and primates failed to randomize the selection of animals.

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

The Americans for Medical Progress is a nonprofit organization that promotes the public understanding and support of animal use in medicine testing. The organization claims that, “Despite claims by animal rights activists, it is undeniable that animal-based research has contributed to significant improvement in the length and quality of our lives”. With this being said, many advancements have been made in medicine because of animal use. Cancer, for example, has medicines that have contributed 10.7% to the life expectancy. Advancements have also been made to HIV/AIDS therapies where researchers use animal models to develop new medicines to help with the therapy of AIDS.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

According to a study done by the FDA, ninety-two percent of drugs, which were produced from animal models, failed to be approved for regular use by humans after they were tested on humans (neavs.org). This means that the vast majority of drugs made from animal testing were not able to help humans and the suffering of those animal models was simply a waste. Elias Zerhouni, who is a medical doctor, researcher, and the former director of the National Institutes of Health, even went as far to say that animal testing has led research to stray away from being used for comprehension of human biology, and we should refocus away from animal testing to get back on track for medical progress (McManus). This shows that animal testing is not helping us understand and cure human diseases. Some people believe that such examples as the use of mice to produce Gleevec, a drug that fights cancer, is reason enough to say that animal testing benefits humans medically (amprogress.org).

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Scientists are not only hurting animals in the process but also putting patients’ in danger. “(W) e have cured mice of cancer for decades”... ”It simply didn’t work on humans” (Moore2). It is just a poor predictor of their effect on humans (Hamil 2). Our world has been introduced to so many new methods as to where we can simulate human’s reaction to different experiments.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

But the bad news is the effect on humans because it causes a heart attack and more than 20,000 died of a sudden heart attack. Most of the drugs tested on animals, approximately 94% found that the failure occurred in experiments with humans. More than 100 types of medicines that were invented to treat stroke can affect animals, but completely failed in humans. Including vaccines for the treatment of HIV more than 85% works well in mammals but failed in humans as well.

Read More
1817 Words | 8 Pages

This is because the anatomic, metabolic and cellular differences of animal and human are very much different from each other which makes them as poor test model as much as irreliable in predicting results in human beings. For instances, cancer has an absymal record of failures where both humans and animals react differently when tested with carcinogen (Greek, 2007). Besides, animal test could also mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatment. Aspirin for example, can be used to reduce fever and relieve mild to moderate pain are found to be harmful to some animal species. These promising drugs may get shelved when they cause problems in animals which are not relevent for human.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Over 100 million animals are tested on every year. Animal testing for human benefit is inhumane and must be stopped. Whether they are being crippled, burned, poisoned, and abused it is still happening in U.S. labs everywhere. Animal testing is an unjust way of finding cures for illness and beauty products. These creatures have no say, and can not do anything about what they are going through.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

However, I’m sure we all lost a beloved one to cancer at one point of our lives, and we wished that there were a way to help them. But do you really think animal testing is the solution? Is killing hundreds of animals for selfish reasons fair to nature? There is no doubt that I, too, want a healthy life to live, but there

Read More
180 Words | 1 Pages

Cancer research has been going on for years. Experts can now cure cancer in a mouse, but not in humans. Animal testing is said to be unreliable and wasteful. Majority of drugs fail on humans, even though it works on the animal that was tested on. There is about ninety-three life threatening drug side effects when taking medication and only nineteen percent of them could be found in animal testing.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

The fact of the matter can be stated in the most simple words, animal testing doesn’t give sufficient information for human matters. According to Cruelty Free International, only 6% of the 4,300 international companies involved in drug development has registered a new drug with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration since 1950. Which would mean

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever had someone special in your life die from cancer? Well, through animal testing there just might be a cure waiting to be discovered. By doing animal testing we find so many cures for tons of diseases almost everyday. It’s helped the human race live and go disease free for a long time. Animal testing has a lot of future benefits like finding a cure/ or treatment for cancer, heart disease, and even diabetes.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not the most reliable way to determine if a drug is safe for human use. A study done by the U.S Food and Drug Administration showed that ninety two percent of drugs entering clinical trials fail to be approved (Capaldo, Theodora). Animal testing is also very expensive and by figuring out new ways to test drugs and products we can save millions of animals and dollars. We are now able to create computer models and simulations of human organs and the researches are able to predict the way new drugs will react in the human body (“Alternatives to Animal Testing”) Other alternatives include cell cultures, micro dosing, and even donated human tissue.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

Just because it works on animals doesn’t mean it will work on humans. For example, there was a drug called thalidomide that was tested on animals that got released to the public afterwards and it caused major severities to babies because their parent was taking the pill while they were pregnant [Animal Testing]. “A 2013 study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) found that nearly 150 clinical trials (human tests) of treatments to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients have been undertaken, and all of them failed, despite being successful in animal tests" (Animal Testing). This study is an example of how well these experimentations

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

“Taking a healthy being from a completely different species, artificially inducing a condition that he or she would never normally contract, keeping him or her in an unnatural and distressful environment, and trying to apply the results to naturally occurring diseases in human beings is dubious at best,” (Animal Testing is Bad Science, PETA). There have been medications that were tested on animals, which did not turn out well for humans. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), “ninety-two percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don't work or are dangerous. And of the small percentage that are approved for human use, half are relabeled because of side effects that were not identified in animal tests,” (Animal Testing is Bad Science, PETA). Former National Cancer Institute Director Dr. Richard Klausner stated, “We have cured mice of cancer for decades, and it simply didn’t work in humans,” (Cancer-Cure Story Raises New Questions, Marlene

Read More
1381 Words | 6 Pages

The millions of animals that are both tested on and murdered due to medical testing is already a cruelty in itself. Many animals that are put through these inhuman tests, live in the worst and harshest conditions. According to the Humane Society International, the animals are subjected to force feeding, food and water deprivation, long periods of physical restraint, inflicted with burns and wounds and killed by suffocation, decapitation, and neck-breaking. These conditions aren’t and shouldn’t be used on any living creature. To put this in scope, the epidemic of these conditions mirror the horrors that the Jews were put through during the Holocaust, if not worse.

Read More

More about Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

Related Topics

Open Document