ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

634 Words3 Pages

Missing the Target: Gun Control Gun control and Second Amendment rights seem to be stealing the headlines in the news and have been in the spotlight of American politics in recent years. One reason for this media obsession is that every time a violent gun crime occurs, more and more states increase the severity of their gun laws, not always with the intended results. As tighter gun laws are implemented in attempt to control violent gun crime in America, the Second Amendment has become an increasingly controversial topic over the last decade. From whatever side of the issue you stand, there is zero evidence that stricter gun laws lead to decreased gun crime. The most vocal and recent attempts of curbing gun violence focus on abolishing private gun ownership and neutralizing the NRA (National Rifle Association) which, in fact, will result …show more content…

In states with strict gun control laws, not allowing citizens to defend themselves against violence, statistics show that these areas report some of the highest gun related crime in the country. Illinois, especially Chicago, enforces extremely strict gun laws and yet reports some of the highest gun crime rates in the country. While the purpose of these laws is to prevent criminals from buying guns and committing violent crimes, they instead keep law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves and their families. As a stark contrast, Colorado enforces loose gun laws and reports some of the lowest gun crime rates in the country. Another example of backfiring gun control is the entire country of Mexico. Mexico enforces extremely strict gun laws and yet yields three times more gun-related crime than the United States. As a contrast, every family in Switzerland is issued a gun and trained how to effectively use it. As a result, Switzerland boasts a significantly lower gun crime rate than other countries with higher than gun

Show More
Related
1334 Words | 6 Pages

As strict gun laws become even stricter, it will eliminate the amount of “guns being bought as well as reduce accidental injuries involving guns” (Vittana). When looking at other countries for gun laws we could adopt/learn from them in order to see what makes their crime rate so much lower than the United States. In Finland for example, “you must prove that you are an active member of regulated shooting clubs, pass an aptitude test, submit a police interview, and show that you have a proper gun storage unit in order to own a gun” (Donohue, John). When looking at Finland’s firearm death rate, we can see that it’s significantly lower than the US. Another country that made their gun laws stricter and decreased the crime rate was Australia.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Some might argue that the US is one of the greatest countries in the world, but compared to others, it's one of the worst when it comes to gun control. It has become apparent that the gun control policies aren't as strict as they should be, as everyday in the US, an average of 36 people are killed at the hands of guns and more than 32,000 people are killed annually. Guns violence impacts society in many ways. Statistics show more people have been killed by guns than all the American wars since 1968 and it's estimated that 280 million people currently own a gun in the US. A country where 280 million people running around with firearms that cause fatal harm is incredibly alarming.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

It’s been said by many people that guns need controlled restricted and even banned. Restricting who gets their hands on guns is a good thing, but it has shown that countries with more restrictive gun licensing laws show fewer deaths by firearms and a lower gun ownership rate. A lab was done and showed that for every 100 people there is about 88 guns. Stated in the same article on the Huffington post it was said that “similar results have been found by the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, which states that countries with higher levels of firearm ownership also have higher firearm homicide rates.” (Huffington post 2015).

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

Lott continues on to mention that Even after accounting for factors such as law enforcement, poverty, and demographics, each percentage point increase in gun ownership produces a four percent drop in violent crime. Backing the claim that, “States with higher gun ownership rates have much lower crime rate” (Lott 29). Lott also mentions that Countries with the strictest gun control laws tend to have the highest homicide rate. This once again shows a correlation between a higher gun ownership rate and a lower violence rate. Mauser and Kates also support Lotts claims by explaining, “Where firearms are most dense violent crime rates are the lowest, and where guns are least dense violent crime rates are the highest” (Kates, Mauser 649).

Read More
1906 Words | 8 Pages

When combining all of these factors of gun control laws, past and present, the result is not quite clear. While taking away all guns that contribute to violent crime would be brilliant on paper, it would limit the ability of citizens to protect themselves. Leaving many without proper means of home protection and subjected to violent crime. The absence of firearms in the hands of U.S. citizens could also cause an uproar across the country. The confusion, in regards to statistics and effectiveness of gun control laws, is due to the different interpretation of crime, which undoubtedly is due to prior bias by the interpreter.

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

Implementing gun control laws on domestic regulation of firearm manufactured, trade, possession, use, and transport can reduce violent killings, and suicide but policies should not focus on reducing crime via restrictions of liberty, but rather address the root causes and motivations. Gun control fails to solve the causes of gun violence in favor of political grandstanding. Studies have shown a decline and murdered victims, violence in urban areas and drug prohibition . The largest U.S. cities have seen some of the largest percentage declines.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Did you know that the US is third in the world in murders? If you don’t count Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit, St. Louis, and Washington D.C. then the US would be 189th out of 193 countries. However, all five of those cities have very strict gun control laws. You may think that gun control helps, but it really doesn't. A study shows that in the past as more people owned guns, the crime rate has gone down.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Although Chicago has “some of the strictest gun laws” in the country in 2016, four thousand people were found victim of gun related crime. Between 2015 and 2016 gun homicides within the city rose by an astounding 61 percent, particularly huge compared to other Cities ( 25.1 per 100,000 residents) while (14.1 per 100,000) in Philadelphia and only (2.3 per 100,000 ) in New york (Kurtzleben 1). States around Chicago have relatively low scores on the grade scale from the law center to prevent gun violence. Sixty percent of new guns used in chicago gang-related crimes and 31.6 percent used in non gang-related crimes between 2009 and 2015 were bought in different states. State lines don’t stop guns, gun

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

However, gun control is highly ineffective in areas that gun control has been enacted in the country. As well as “Gun Free Zones” being centralized as high-target opportunities

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Although mass shootings have greatly increased from 2001, bring in stricter gun laws is not a simple solution(Schmidt 2014). Throughout the years statics show that despite the fact that bring stricter gun laws seems like a good idea, it is often worse for the community. For example, California is known for its very strict gun laws, ranking at number one in the US, and this is a key factor to why crime rates are some of the highest in the country (Hartvigsen 2013). Statistics also show that from 1993 to 2013 guns per person has arisen and gain control per person has lowered (perry

Read More
1295 Words | 6 Pages

Gun Control “During the period in which Chicago’s handgun ban was effective (1982 to 2010), 59% of all murders in Chicago were committed with handguns (data unavailable for 2000 to 2002),” (“Gun Control”, Par. 20). Chicago is considered one of the most strict of places when it comes to gun laws and the funny thing about this statistic is that, before Chicago implemented this ban, 48% of all murders were committed with handguns. Gun control as a whole has been one of the most controversial topic of today's world. Some people think that there is too much gun control and some people think there is too little gun control.

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the years there have been many incidents involving gun control. The United States is the top country that has the most gun- related crimes. Here in the U.S. there should be stricter laws in how gun control should be handle and specific restrictions with guns in general. Even though some people feel that they have the right to the 2nd amendment, there should be stricter laws on handling weapons such as more thorough background checks and mental health screenings. To begin with, “recent events that involve tragedies, violent acts and massacres due from guns have raised the issue of gun control’ (Breck).

Read More
1169 Words | 5 Pages

Alexis Clarke Professor Frank English 110 29 October 2015 Gun Control Will Not Eliminate Crime The big issue of gun control in the United States, is that many people believe that it takes away the 2nd Amendment rights, which is the right to bear arms. Citizens of the United States are promised the the right to bear arms in the Constitution, and by applying gun control laws takes away that same right. Crime is high enough in cities with very few laws pertaining to gun control, but taking guns away from people who are registered with license will not solve the problem either. Placing more limitations on gun owners, particularly responsible gun owners, will not reduce gun violence.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

Moorhouse, John C, and Brent Wanner. “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?” Ebscohost, 1 Jan. 2006, web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=db378b8b-d9e7-4ee7-b26c-460bc1177bd4%40sessionmgr4008. Moorhouse and Wanner, in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, studied whether or not gun control reduced gun violence in individual states. The overarching theme throughout the individual states is that gun control doesn’t reduce gun violence and is very ineffective.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Instead of banning or limiting guns, the evidence will show that removing the current restrictions and targeting individuals instead of guns will be a more effective process. The topic of gun control has two polarized opinions. One such opinion targets the individuals responsible for the crime, instead of just the weapons. John Moorhouse and Brent Wanner tackle the issue of gun control in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, which was published in 2006 in the twenty-sixth volume of the Cato Journal. These researchers looked at the effects gun control laws had on violent crime and gun violence in the individual states.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document