Argumentative Essay: Should College Players Get Paid

Another reason why college players should be getting paid is that that the NCAA organization are treating the players like workers. These competitors are playing games and getting cash to the college consistently, yet aren't getting any money themselves. These competitors are working for the schools and are doing a support of the school that appears to go unnoticed. This absence of pay is not seen anyplace else in the work put and shouldn't be seen here. Some even contend, "School competitors are being misused by their schools, which make a huge number of dollars off of intercollegiate games" (Should to Undergraduate Competitors Get Paid?). Schools are utilizing these competitors to support their separate notorieties and get income while not repaying these competitors for

Paying school competitors would diminish the illicit debt that competitors frequently get to go to specific universities, which regularly happens now. This would significantly profit the school since they would not be suspended from numerous things or seen as awful universities. For instance, if universities somehow managed to pay a football player, the school could get suspended from BCS bowl diversions which will bring about the school to lose cash they would have gotten for partaking in the bowl amusement. A way it would profit the competitor is keeping the competitor in school. On the off chance that school competitors were to get paid to play more competitors would stay in school, rather than dropping out for any desires for going professional. (Griffin 17). In that situation, the competitors were to remain in school they would finish their degree and have a superior point of view. A professional education is basic to land a decent position which would bring about a higher pay and potentially a better life in the future. Paying school competitors would enormously profit both the competitor and the