Proposition 13, which the voters of California approved in 1978, limited property taxes to one percent of cash value at the purchase price. Another clause stated that to pass a budget and tax increase, the legislature must agree with at least ⅔ voting to approve. Some of the pros were the immediate relief it provided to homeowners upon ratification to the California state constitution. It provided a sense of predictability during the period of stagflation, and even during the housing booms and busts to subsequently follow, for residents who purchased property in years of low prices, they received the best bargain.
The proposition 13 amendment is a property tax about how taxes can’t exceed 1% of a property value. California has always had a problem with taxes due to the enormous number of illegal immigrants don’t pay taxes but use public services that are funded by taxes. This was partly solved by legalizing marijuana which made a large dent in the debt California had. Maybe these golf courses paying the correct amount of taxes would fix the tax problem altogether. Land use comes into play because everyone needs to have their property at its best use according to the taxes.
The given source proposes initiative measure No.594 regarding background checks for sales and transfer of guns. Initiative measure No.594 consists of three main part with its subparts. It includes: explanatory statement proclaiming the current law regarding gun distribution and its foreseen consequences that will apply to the current law if the measure is approved; fiscal impact statement including general assumptions, state revenue assumptions, state revenues, state expenditure assumptions, state expenditures, local government revenue assumptions, local government revenues, local government expenditure assumptions, local government expenditures; arguments against and arguments for measure No.594 coming into force. The main controversy of the document is a wobbly balance between a
president again because they have only been elected once. There have been several attempts to remove the 22nd Amendment. REASONS FOR FDR SEEKING A FOOURTH TERM, IF HIS TERM INITIATED THE DRAFTNG OF THE 22ND AMENDMENT Because the war Europe was in a terrible state, and American’s entrance into the war had begun the public did not want to have a new president in the middle of the war. The 22nd
Current Status, Proponents/Opponents and Budget/Fiscal Impact The current status of Senate Bill 177 is active and chaptered (S.B. 177, 2013). It is currently located in the Secretary of State’s office and was last amended on August 5, 2013 (S.B. 177, 2013). It is not time limited and does not seem to have a date for review (S.B. 177, 2013). According to the Senate Floor Analyses, or the Unfinished Business Report, from September 9, 2013, the proponents of Senate Bill 177, as verified on August 9, 2013, were a total of 15 (S.B. 177, 2013, p. 3). Some of the proponents, as listed in the Unfinished Business Report, were the California Youth Empowerment Network, Hillsides and the National Association of Social Workers (S.B. 177, 2013).
In 1998, the growing resentment of the immigrants led to the approval of California Proposition 227, known as English Language in Public Schools Statue. Proposition 227 gave Californians the opportunities to choose whether students should or should not be taught primarily in English in public schools. When the Proposition 227 was approved, it was supported by the idea that it would be the “best way to integrate the state’s booming immigrant population
Prop. 63 is about limiting and putting restrictions on gun and ammunition sales. I, personally, believe that Prop.63 is an outstanding idea because putting restrictions on buying firearms and bullets will provide more safety for the citizens. Currently, when people want to purchase a firearm, they must get their background checked in order to purchase a firearm. Contrarily, purchasing ammunition does not require a background check but will in January 2017. If Prop 63 passes, people who have criminal records or mental illnesses will not be able to purchase or own a gun.
In the Los Angeles Times article “Fighting for Multilingual Learning,” Jazmine Ulloa describes the importance for the schools to have bilingual and multilingual programs. The article which gives information about how some of the schools on local communities are trying to push for new programs described by Ulloa is very important to create programs that will be beneficial for the students. The article describes how the education leaders are hoping to stimulate the growth of the bilingual classes in California. Moreover, it discusses that less than 5% of public schools offer bilingual and multilingual programs. One of the most important points she makes is that only 693 teachers were certified in bilingual education last year, down 45% from 1,268
272). However, there was a disparity in the goals of bilingual education since “bilingual educators had come to see the program as a way to preserve non-English languages and cultures, … congressmen still thought of it as a bridge to help learn English” (Ravitch, 1983, pg. 275). Legislators felt that learning English would be the means by which minority students could catch up with middle-class students. Bilingual teachers, however, saw that once minority students began to feel pride in their culture at school, the divide between students would close. Additionally, eligibility for bilingual programs in the US made it possible for a student “entirely fluent in English” (Ravitch, 1983, pg. 274).
Get Rid of Senate Bill 11 For years, we thought of school’s as a place to leave our kids to learn free from fear and violence. However, Senate Bill 11, has passed allowing individuals with concealed hand licenses to carry their guns on Texas college campuses. Which has distilled fear upon some faculty, students, and staff. There are some people who would disagree because they believe Senate Bill 11 would make our campuses safer, but we should get rid of Senate Bill 11. It will only lead us to catastrophe.
But even when they didn’t learn English themselves, their children grew up speaking it. Thousands of first-generation Americans still strive to learn English, but others face reduced educational and career opportunities because they have not mastered this basic skill they need to get ahead. According to the 1990 census, 40 percent of the Hispanics born in the United States do not graduate from high school, and the Department of Education says that a lack of proficiency in English is an important factor in the drop-out rate. People and agencies that favor providing services only in foreign languages want to help people who do not speak English, but they may be doing these people a disservice by condemning them to a linguistic ghetto from which they cannot easily escape.
The parent’s perspective towards bilingual education was like the student’s opinions because both individuals felt immersion classrooms benefit the students and the parents. The father of Jason was proud his son was the first in his family to read, write, and speak in English. Jason’s father knew his son would have many career opportunities by learning English at school. Learning the English academic language was not the only proud language Jason’s father encouraged for Jason to learn but also the Spanish language as well. Jason’s father only speaks Spanish so if his son was to lose his home language, a language barrier would form between father and son.
Module Response 5: Bilingual Education Programs & Teaching Bilingually 1 Based on your new, or perhaps revised, understanding of bilingual education programs and the rationale for teaching English learners in the U.S. bilingually, and maybe even based on your own experiences teaching in the schools, what do you believe is the best way to teach English learners a) the English language, b) academic language and content, c) critical thinking skills, d) skills that would prepare them for post-secondary education, e) experiences that would help them to lead productive lives in our global society? The Texas Education Agency (TEA) defines English Language Learner (ELL) as a “Student of limited English proficiency” means a student whose primary language
Supporters also believed that this law could improve the drop out rate from high schools and colleges. The Hoover Institute also had the top five reasons why Hispanics dropped out according to Spanish speaking educators. The reasons were: the students fell behind early on because they didn’t know English when being taught the basics, many teachers did not have patience or respect for non English speakers, they were not surrounded by English enough to catch on, they didn’t see why higher education was necessary if there were jobs without degrees, they were in a family where education was not the top priority. Those who were against the law believe it is too costly, provides a reason to resist assimilation of the dominant language, and is ineffective because “Immigrants are kept linguistically isolated” according to the University of Michigan. Some even argued that the Fourteenth Amendment was not a valid argument in this situation.
His narrative shows this support and how having instruction in Spanish and English allows him to have higher academics. In less than ten years, one third of students attending public schools will not know English when starting Kindergarten. Are schools and teachers ready for this and will push for bilingual instruction? Is America ready for this? As for now, there is mixed perspectives.
