Civil Rights Movement In The 1960's

1001 Words5 Pages

Desegregation of education and employment opportunists are two changes that took place as a result of the civil rights movement of the 1960's. The Civil War may have begun the movement to create equality to all Americans, however the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments provide easier to accomplish in theory than in practice. The ideas of racial equality faltered during reconstitution, as laws were passed to enforce segregation of races thus enforcing a second-class status among African Americans (United States. National Park Service, 2001.) For 100 years after the Civil War, African Americans still experienced a starkly unequal world than their counterparts of European ancestry. The Civil Rights movement was an attempt to create equality among minorities, …show more content…

These would be the first African Americans to attend Central High School. The governor of Arkansas Orval Faubus announced that he would call in the Arkansas National Guard to prevent the African-American students’ entry to Central High. Faubus insisted that violence and bloodshed might break out if black students were allowed to enter the school. The Mother’s League from Central High School held a sunrise service at the school to protest against integration, the day after Faubus' announcement. Federal judge Richard Davies issued a ruling that desegregation would continue as planned the next day September 4, 1957.(History.com Staff, …show more content…

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibited private employers from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Title VII also provided for the creation of the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.) Since the EEOC has opened for operations in 1965, it had been pursuing its mission to eliminate unlawful employment discrimination. Because of the opposition in order to open for businesses compromises were made while the bill was still in legislation, an agreement was made allowing the EEOC the authority to receive investigate and conciliate charges of discrimination, but not given the authority to sue employers. The EEOC's only enforcement was with the Attorney General. Once the EEOC had referred charges tot eh Attorney General, He then could intervene with civil actions. Those actions however could only be started by private individuals who felt discriminated against. (Occhialino, and Vail, 2005) So the EEOC's job became investigating and finding individuals who had been discriminated against in which the Attorney General could then bring civil actions against the employer. So began a process of charges being filed against employers and the EEOC investigating those allegations. To do this the EEOC sent members to the city were the allegations had been made to investigate, this