Since the prospect has been available to humankind, debates have continued concerning the ethics of using human stem cells for research, many having strong opinions on the matter. Multiple books, novels, and short stories about this dilemma were written decades ago, including Frankenstein by Mary Shelley in which a man creates life and "The Birthmark" by Nathaniel Hawthorne in which a man loses a life in the name of science. The possible ramifications and consequences are shown in these writings that can be used a precedent. Both scientific facts and literature, including Frankenstein and "The Birthmark," prove there are many ethical factors that must be considered with human cloning experimentation and stem cell research.
One issue that presents itself is the question of where the boundaries lie when it comes the pursuit of knowledge. For example, even George Bush commented on the ethics of using human stem cells for research: "the interests of embryos should be weighed against the potential benefits of stem cell research to humans" (Bush 1). Various arguments have risen
…show more content…
In many cases including his, the pursuit of knowledge produces previously mentioned risks. These odds are hardly worth the outcome such as the deaths and deformities that have occurred and will continue to occur with human cloning experiments. In addition, Frankenstein believes in the cliché "ignorance is bliss." This, with his situation, means the absence of knowledge brings the absence of worry, responsibility, and accountability. Frankenstein considers what he once thought would be his success to be a burden. Not only can science negativity affect the scientist but also those around