ipl-logo

Creation Science Vs Christian Religion

723 Words3 Pages

According to the “Creation Science” page of Wikipedia, the term “creationism” first became linked with Christian Fundamentalism, a movement that aimed to revise the traditional Christian beliefs to correlate with new natural and social science in the 19th century. Creationism can also be translated into “creation myth” in which followers bring in skepticism to scientific theories as to how the earth came to be. Although opinions of creationism may vary, there is a unity of thought that God created the universe. Creation science is significantly centered on the Book of Genesis, which describes how God created the world through his powers. It is claimed to be a pseudoscience that attempts to place biblical events into science. Therefore the …show more content…

The hidden assumption that is not stated by believers would be that the Christian religion is the superior religion amongst all because it is the one in which their God had created the universe.
What is one kind of evidence they use?
The evidence provided by those in the field of creation science is the narrative from the Book of Genesis. They also rely on well-known or higher authority of the past. Believers of creation science claim that the Bible holds the description of creation and consequently, all later sciences must correspond to the specific depiction.
What is one alternative, more plausible explanation, for their claims?
An alternative explanation that makes creation science more plausible is that there is no definite truth to all the theories of the earth’s creation or evolution. Although some data is in favor, it is not set in stone. This gives opportunity for believers to incorporate their strong faith in their religion and correspond it to their understanding of the world. Creation science does not reject all scientific theories.
2. …show more content…

They claim that the Bible is incapable of being wrong. In the article “Why Should a Christian Believe in Creation?” by Dr. John D. Morris, evolution is seen as an inadequate science because he claims that there is no way of testing it and that there is no evidence in fossil records. This is illogical because there is evidence of evolution in fossil records through their similarities of common ancestors.
3. Baloney Detection
Creation science violates three of the Shermer’s ten baloney detection kit points. It does not fit with the way the world works. Creation science rejects a fundamental principle of modern geology. This principle is one that pertains to today’s observations of physical and geological laws to understand geological history. Personal beliefs are the drive behind creation science. In order to support creationism, one must understand the context of the Bible and believe in it. Therefore the personal belief behind this is the strong sense of religion. The McLean v. Arkansas ruling of 1982 found that creation science fails to meet standard scientific characteristic and is more concentrated in advancing the religious

Show More
Related
1118 Words | 5 Pages

Causing an anti-evolution movement to sweep across the nation as many religious groups to speak out against the teaching of evolution being re added. In the 1960’s they came up with a theory and introduced it nationally as “creation science”. “The theory of creation science claimed that the universe and life in it came about suddenly and from nothing”(Childs). Those that tended to agree with this theory consisted of religious citizens who believed the theory of darwin contained insufficient information. They argued that earth and life were recent creations, humans and apes come from different ancestors, and that earth's geology was initiated by sudden, violent events .(Hanson)The result of having different mindsets evidently show the barrier that these teachings have on the United States.

Read More
2235 Words | 9 Pages

Overall, Creationism sounds like a children’s story while Evolution is very detailed, informative, and educational. Creationism confuses students and lures them away from their educational thinking process. In many circumstances, Creationism has refuted scientific theories and has unraveled the lot that science, in most schools has taught us about human derivation. Evolution and Creation are two of the most common theories of human origin, although numerous religious people believe in Creation, the bible’s timeline does not match up

Read More
1660 Words | 7 Pages

Abortion is an issue within our society that is argumentative on both sides with opposing points of view, one being pro-choice and one being pro-life. This essay will discuss abortion laws in Queensland whilst exploring how the legislation should be modified. All issues regarding to this topic of discussion need to be looked at with an open-mind and awareness of all viewpoints. Abortion laws in Queensland do not support the forever changing beliefs of society, they do not allow the public to have a say and do not consider the women's rights. This essay will be evaluating the current effectiveness and practicality of current laws and issues.

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

While traditional scientific theories often rely on observable phenomena and testable hypotheses, creation science often confides in supernatural explanations that transcend empirical investigation. This poses a dilemma for determining its falsifiability. Because creation science is a belief system, it serves a different purpose than what we think of as traditional science. As a result of this, it may not be applicable to try to use the characteristics of traditional science to categorize creationism. The ambiguity of the supernatural aspects make it hard to concretely determine if creation science is falsifiable, but the best way to approach it in this context is to pull apart each individual claim.

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

Supporting a Creationist Worldview with Science Scientific evidence is consistent with the belief that the physical universe was designed by God. After researching this topic, I was interested to find just how much supportive evidence there is for creation and its beliefs. There is a misconception that the Bible is old, dated, and couldn’t have enough solid evidence to support the idea that a God of ancient times could have spoken the world as we know it into existence. One would think that modern science and research would be able to yield a much more sensible, concrete formula for the origin of life, and certainly one that makes more sense than an invisible God in heaven forming it from nothing. This is however, as I mentioned previously, a misconception

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The first is biblical creationists believe in the bibles version of how the earth came to be “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (Bible), they take this passage in the bible as the literal way that the earth was created

Read More
1321 Words | 6 Pages

The openness of Old Earth creationism is a blurred as it interpretation of Genesis 1-2. A scientific discovery that can support their theory on the age of earth is radiometric dating commonly known as Carbon dating. This process involves estimating the age of fossils to prove that the earth is in fact billions of years old. Such evidence closely relates to the lose interpretation of the word “day” in Genesis 1. Out of three theories theistic theories is the one more opened to evidence provided by scientific reasoning.

Read More
1916 Words | 8 Pages

In a world that revolves around justification, religion sometimes is something that can not be justified. Christian churches are struggling with this idea of giving present day evidence to long time and newcoming members. This is what many people call the division of science and religion. Many churches are losing members because of this divide and the only way to fix it, is to give that scientific evidence that backs up the word of the Bible. This is a very difficult task for the leaders of the Church as there is little evidence to prove the creation story which is stated within the first book of the Bible, Genesis.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

Historical knowledge and science provide a point where biblical and cultural stories collide (Goheen & Bartholomew, p. 130). Culture is communicated through common stories and events. Science or the human desire to explain what is seen can be identified within Greek mythology throughout history to the postmodern views of today. The Christian worldview provides a basis for belief in a creator, not dependent on human action continue existence (Goheen & Bartholomew, p. 23). Scientific exploration and discovery is a part of God’s creation.

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

R. M. Hare would apparently say that accurate creationism is artlessly a modification of the adventure of conception in Genesis, to fit into the ÒblikÓ of the religious fundamentalist. A blik, as Hare describes it, is a pre-set worldview captivated by all people, in which they draw from if basic assertive opinions on any accurate subject. In the case of religious fundamentalist, whose acceptance in the authority of the Book of Genesis is an capital allotment of their blik, it becomes all-important for them to bend their accurate appearance of the Book of Genesis into a anatomy that is scientifically acceptable. For this reason, conception science still does not accept a abode in the science classroom of accessible

Read More
1329 Words | 6 Pages

R. M. Bunny would obviously say that precise creationism is guilelessly an adjustment of the experience of origination in Genesis, to fit into the diagonal of the religious fundamentalist. It turns into immensely vital for them to twist their precise appearance of the Book of Genesis into a life systems that is logically adequate. Therefore, origination science still does not acknowledge a homestead the science classroom of available schools. Another botheration with precise creationism is that it would reject the reflection of a coincidental starting. No entrance could at whatever time be enacted to procurement roots in light of the fact that it would fight with exact creationism.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

Creationism is a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing and usually in the way described in Genesis. One prominent characteristic of Creationism is the time or expansion of time that this theory relates to. Creationism has many different meanings as one theory is that the universe was created by God then left alone. Another being a deity that has been actively been in life since the beginning of time. Then there is time and how old the Earth is.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

Scientists across various fields of studies with excellent academic achievements voice their unwavering belief in the theory of creation, and they depict multiple experiments and studies to solidify the validity of creationism. Evolution versus creationism is a battle that began long before today’s modern trials and protests, yet the same basic principles still exist. Creationism is as scientific as evolution, and evolution is as faith-based as

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

In addition, a scientific law name Biogenesis says that life comes from life and nonliving matter cannot suddenly become alive nor produce life unless there was intervention from an outside force. For evolutionary theories to work, laws of science would have to be ignored. Science has proven the views of evolution illogical and the claim that God had direct divine involvement in His creation has yet to be proven, but science has confirmed some biblical statements verified by the laws of science and archeological discoveries. The Bible can be used to corroborate history and the science of archeology has confirmed some Biblical history. For example, critics frowned at references about a group of people called “Hittites” in the Bible.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Nicalea Greenlee Astronomy, 7 December 15, 2017 Science vs. Religion Science and religion has always been an argument for years. I think science and religion are both very important to the way of life and how we see the entire universe. But I believe religion is more believable than science. For science can be proven wrong at any given time and religion can never be stated untrue. Such as the story of creation, evolution, practices and beliefs can contradict these theories.

Read More

More about Creation Science Vs Christian Religion

Related Topics

Open Document