Dear Jury Members: Is Mr Bennett Guilty Of Murder Mr. Adams?
Dear Jury Members: Mr. David Eldrige should be found guilty of the murder of Mr. Armes. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he is guilty because his fingerprints were found on the spatula that killed Mr. Eldrige, There was also no sign of a break-in but the register was empty, the safe was open, and the recipe was gone. Also, David had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he had not been given a raise. The first reason is that Mr. Armes was killed with a metal spatula, and David Eldridge’s fingerprints were on the spatula.
Mr Eldridge should be found guilty of the crime of the murder of Mr Arms because there are zero doubts that Mr Eldridge is guilty. Although the Defense claims that he is innocent, Mr. Eldridge stated that he went into the morning of the murder and begged for a raise. When denied he quit, Sandy Smith stated that he was in desperate need of money at the time of the murder. Also, Mr. Eldridge didn’t know the code to the safe where the recipe was located, making him have to break into it to be able to retrieve it. His fingerprints and footprints were found at the crime scene.
Dear Jury Members: David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. The evidence against Eldridge is his prints were found at the scene of the crime, there was no sign of a forced entry, and that he had asked Mr. Arms for a raise after working at the Family Fun restaurant for years but he was denied, leaving him to get upset and he has been heard saying negative things about Mr. Arms. The strongest reason in the case of David Eldridge is that Mr. Eldridge's prints were found at the crime scene and there had been no sign of any form of break-in. Police investigators had found fingerprints on the spatula that was used to murder Mr. Arms and came to the conclusion that the prints belonged to David Eldridge.
There are multiple strong pieces of evidence proving this to be true. These pieces of evidence prove that Mr. Eldridge is guilty. David Eldridge is guilty of Mr Armes’ murder. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that David Eldridge had a spatula with Mr.Armes’ blood on it.
This shows how there are other suspects in the case, so there is no defiant way to say Mr Bennet is guilty. Finally, in conclusion, Mr. Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams. Because reasonable doubt exists, this is because. Mr Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down
Dear Jury Members:David Eldridge should have been found guilty because there were many signs and evidence pointing that he was there the night of the murder and that he had a motive for killing Mr Arms. The strongest piece of evidence that shows that he was the murderer first he asked Mr Arms for a rise and he was denied and he was so mad that he planned to kill Mr Arms and secondly he and Mr Arms were the only ones that knew the code to the safe and there was no sign of forced entry which means he was had the key to the building and the combination to the safe.the strongest piece of evidence in the case was that he had a motive to kill him which makes him a suspect.when david eldridge went to his boss for a raise and he got denied he was super
Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty of murdering Mr. Armes with a kitchen spatula and there is sound reasoning to back up this claim. Although the defense claims that Mr. Eldridge is not guilty, they are wrong because David Eldridge’s footprints were found all over the grease which was found all over the crime scene, also Mr. Eldridge was very mad about not getting a raise that morning, and Mr. Armes got into a very big argument on the morning of the murder. Those are the sound reasons that I know back up the claim that Mr. David Eldridge did commit the crime of killing Mr. Armes with a kitchen spatula. First, Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty because Sandy Smith stated that Mr. Eldridge’s business was not doing well financially
Can you imagine being a business owner and trusting an employee so much you give the keys to your business and the combination of your safety with your secret recipe? This was Mr. Armes. And Mr. Eldridge, his trusted employee, responded by murdering him. Mr. David Eldridge should be found guilty because reasonable evidence exists. Mr. Eldridge was seen entering the restaurant two hours before the body was found and one hour later Mr. Armes was heard screaming loudly and Mr. Eldridge’s footprints were found in the grease around the body.
The cases of O.J. Simpson and Lizzie Borden are two court cases in American history that are 100 years apart, conversely are very parallel. On both occasions the verdict comes to be the same: not guilty. Circumstantial evidence, which is defined as evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion or fact, was heavily utilized in the process of prosecuting both subjects. Both Orenthal James Simpson and Lizzie Borden should be found guilty of murder due to the continuous number of things that prove their guilt.
Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because reasonable doubt exists. Although the prosecution claims he was guilty, they are incorrect because when he found Mr. Adams died he immediately checked for a pulse and didn't find one after checking. Mr. Bennett's fingerprints were not found on the coffee cup that was used for his coffee. The strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Alfaro’s prints were also found on the coffee mug. The rat poison found in the cupboard was only available to exterminators.
Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.
I believe the defendant's absence of sympathy for other people and unwillingness to understand and empathize with people who are different from him led to him unconsciously setting up the circumstances for his brother to be killed. I believe that this makes him a danger to others. So, jury as you make your decision on whether or not the defendant is guilty I ask that you all seriously analyze the behaviors of Adam Armstrong and realize that they are not normal and that he needs serious help. Thank
Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty because there is beyond reasoning that Mr. Bennet did not kill Mr. Armes. Although the prosecution thinks he's guilty, the evidence shows that he's not. For example, one reason why he's not guilty is that it could have been the exterminator because he came over the same day Mr. Armes died and he could've put the rat poison in his coffee. The strongest piece of evidence in this case is that the spilled coffee had rat poisoning in it. Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty of the crime of Mr. Armes' death because reasonable doubt exists.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.
“A person is innocent until proved guilty in a court of law” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence, the three that are in doubt are the old man hearing “I’m going to kill you!” as well as the weapon of choice and how it was replicated, and finally the woman’s testimony. In my opinion, the boy could have been proven guilty, based on these the boy is not guilty.
More about Dear Jury Members: Is Mr Bennett Guilty Of Murder Mr. Adams?
Court Case Of Mr. David Eldrige Guilty
448 Words | 2 PagesEldridge V. Arms: Case Study
712 Words | 3 PagesEldridge V. Arms Case Essay
656 Words | 3 PagesDavid Eldridge Is Guilty
332 Words | 2 PagesIa 52801 Jury Evidence
396 Words | 2 PagesDavid Eldridge's Motivations For The Murder Of Mr Arms
500 Words | 2 PagesDavid Eldridge Case
536 Words | 3 PagesWho Is Mr. V. Eldridge's Guilty?
566 Words | 3 PagesWhat Are The Similarities Between O. J. Simpson And Lizzie Borden
945 Words | 4 PagesMr Adams Research Paper
473 Words | 2 PagesGuilty To Jury Members: David Eldiridge
692 Words | 3 PagesAdam Armstrong Opening Statement
741 Words | 3 PagesMr Bennet Should Not Be Found Guilty
343 Words | 2 PagesArgumentative Essay: The Murder Of Mr. Stephens
548 Words | 3 PagesExamples Of Innocence In 12 Angry Men
333 Words | 2 Pages