Dear Jury Members: Mr. David Eldrige should be found guilty of the murder of Mr. Armes. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he is guilty because his fingerprints were found on the spatula that killed Mr. Eldrige, There was also no sign of a break-in but the register was empty, the safe was open, and the recipe was gone. Also, David had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he had not been given a raise. The first reason is that Mr. Armes was killed with a metal spatula, and David Eldridge’s fingerprints were on the spatula.
Mr Eldridge should be found guilty of the crime of the murder of Mr Arms because there are zero doubts that Mr Eldridge is guilty. Although the Defense claims that he is innocent, Mr. Eldridge stated that he went into the morning of the murder and begged for a raise. When denied he quit, Sandy Smith stated that he was in desperate need of money at the time of the murder. Also, Mr. Eldridge didn’t know the code to the safe where the recipe was located, making him have to break into it to be able to retrieve it. His fingerprints and footprints were found at the crime scene.
There are multiple strong pieces of evidence proving this to be true. These pieces of evidence prove that Mr. Eldridge is guilty. David Eldridge is guilty of Mr Armes’ murder. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that David Eldridge had a spatula with Mr.Armes’ blood on it.
Dear Jury Members:David Eldridge should have been found guilty because there were many signs and evidence pointing that he was there the night of the murder and that he had a motive for killing Mr Arms. The strongest piece of evidence that shows that he was the murderer first he asked Mr Arms for a rise and he was denied and he was so mad that he planned to kill Mr Arms and secondly he and Mr Arms were the only ones that knew the code to the safe and there was no sign of forced entry which means he was had the key to the building and the combination to the safe.the strongest piece of evidence in the case was that he had a motive to kill him which makes him a suspect.when david eldridge went to his boss for a raise and he got denied he was super
Can you imagine being a business owner and trusting an employee so much you give the keys to your business and the combination of your safety with your secret recipe? This was Mr. Armes. And Mr. Eldridge, his trusted employee, responded by murdering him. Mr. David Eldridge should be found guilty because reasonable evidence exists. Mr. Eldridge was seen entering the restaurant two hours before the body was found and one hour later Mr. Armes was heard screaming loudly and Mr. Eldridge’s footprints were found in the grease around the body.
Have you ever considered how people get away with things, like stealing and theft? Most have, and they still wonder just how. David Eldrige had all the right materials to murder Mr. Armes. His fingerprints were also found at the crime scene. This is why David Eldrige should be found guilty.
The cases of O.J. Simpson and Lizzie Borden are two court cases in American history that are 100 years apart, conversely are very parallel. On both occasions the verdict comes to be the same: not guilty. Circumstantial evidence, which is defined as evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion or fact, was heavily utilized in the process of prosecuting both subjects. Both Orenthal James Simpson and Lizzie Borden should be found guilty of murder due to the continuous number of things that prove their guilt.
In each trial, whether it’s theft or murder, the jury all have the same duty. Their burden is to determine whether the defendant is guilty of the crime they are accused of, or not. The jury is expected to take testimonies and facts into account and go forth with a decision from there. In Mary Bennett’s case, the jury must determine whether she is guilty of second-degree murder of her infant daughter. For the defendant to be guilty of second-degree murder, the jury must determine if Bennett intended to kill her daughter, made a conscious decision to do so at that moment, and was aware of the consequences of her actions (“Mary Bennett,” pg 5).
Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because reasonable doubt exists. Although the prosecution claims he was guilty, they are incorrect because when he found Mr. Adams died he immediately checked for a pulse and didn't find one after checking. Mr. Bennett's fingerprints were not found on the coffee cup that was used for his coffee. The strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Alfaro’s prints were also found on the coffee mug. The rat poison found in the cupboard was only available to exterminators.
Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.
I believe the defendant's absence of sympathy for other people and unwillingness to understand and empathize with people who are different from him led to him unconsciously setting up the circumstances for his brother to be killed. I believe that this makes him a danger to others. So, jury as you make your decision on whether or not the defendant is guilty I ask that you all seriously analyze the behaviors of Adam Armstrong and realize that they are not normal and that he needs serious help. Thank
Bennett is a character from Genshin Impact who has bad luck and is on an adventure team. While the character Bennett is a happy, fun guy who wouldn’t hurt a fly, Mr. Bennett, who is on trial today, is not. Today we will be discussing the horrible death of Mr. Adams and his murderer, Mr. Bennett. The undeniable evidence of how Mr. Bennett had the same substance used by the murderer on him and all the indicators of suspicion will show his guilt. Mr. Bennett is guilty of murder in the first degree on the undeniable evidence of the case.
Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty because there is beyond reasoning that Mr. Bennet did not kill Mr. Armes. Although the prosecution thinks he's guilty, the evidence shows that he's not. For example, one reason why he's not guilty is that it could have been the exterminator because he came over the same day Mr. Armes died and he could've put the rat poison in his coffee. The strongest piece of evidence in this case is that the spilled coffee had rat poisoning in it. Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty of the crime of Mr. Armes' death because reasonable doubt exists.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.
“A person is innocent until proved guilty in a court of law” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence, the three that are in doubt are the old man hearing “I’m going to kill you!” as well as the weapon of choice and how it was replicated, and finally the woman’s testimony. In my opinion, the boy could have been proven guilty, based on these the boy is not guilty.
