The way that the authors used logos was the fact that both are all about the facts. A lot of the article talks about straight facts and how things happened throughout the era of the Holocaust. They talk about how rules were written to keep the children safe and how to do so without people questioning them. An exact number of how many kids were saved is not known. Other facts that do a good job and support their claim can catch the reader’s eye. Ethos is used by using facts to back up their arguments and claims. Readers should be able to trust that the authors one finds that they know what they are talking about. After some research of each author, they are both trustworthy writers. Another thing is the politics, politics are very important to the society that we live in so it would be safe to say that the authors could easily be trusted with the information they portray. The authors used an example of a document, that was found on October 23, 1946, with instructions on how keep the Jewish children out of the hands of Jewish officials. It also says that the children are not allowed to be given back to the parents once the parents …show more content…
For a lot people who have kids this article could hit home. It is good that the authors related to people who read this article. It may be emotional, but that is how writers can interact and connect to their readers. It is very important that the authors do that because then it makes people want to read it and want to tell other people to read it. Another thing that is good about using relatable topics is that it makes people stop and think and reflect on the topic. When this happens, people can ask questions and talk to the authors about the article. Another thing it does when making people think and ask questions it challenges the authors and when they can answer the questions it just add and builds up more trustworthiness. It shows that the authors really do know what they are