ipl-logo

Feudalism Vs High School Research Paper

752 Words4 Pages

A Comparison Between Feudalism and High School During high school many students feel like they are part of a social system like feudalism. Feudalism was a form of social organization that started in the Middle Ages to put order in societies social classes. Feudalism put order to Western Europe and allowed everyone to have a place among the feudal power. In high school everyone is ranked from highest power to, little power, then no power at all. Both high school and feudalism are like in some ways, but are different in the way high school is ranked socially, the way high school battles, and the way high schools punish. Both high school and feudalism are set up on the social order scale “a strict division into social classes, i.e., nobility, clergy, peasantry” …show more content…

The superintendent is chosen by a board of school members to represent and direct a school district. The superintendent gives the principal and teachers orders and is responsible for their actions and choices. Kings are next on the social order scale. The King gives land to the lords. The lords, nobles, and knights swore an oath of loyalty to protect the king, and his land at all cost. The Principal is like the king, he or she promises to set out the superintendent’s rules and respect his or her choices. Principals follow the orders given by the Superintendent. Lords are sworn loyalty to the king. They are given a portion of land to protect and they do what the king wants them to do with there land. Teachers are the lords of high school. They are given a classroom to teach students by the way the principal and superintendent want them to teach. They do what the king wants them to do. Knights are below the lords. Knights are armored warriors that protect their lord’s land. They often receive land of their own for service to the lords. Seniors, juniors, and sophomores are like the knights because they are given parking spots

Show More
Related
788 Words | 4 Pages

The societies of Tokugawa Japan (c.1603-1867C.E.) and medieval Europe (c.1000-1500C.E.) had two things in common; a feudal system. A feudal system is something that features hierarchies or social structures. The feudal system normally starts with a religion, which is at the very top of the social pyramid, then it’s the King or monarch for Europe and the shogun for Japan, then there are the nobles for Europe and the daimyos for Japan. As we go down the pyramid there are the warriors, like the knight in Europe and the samurai in Japan, then there are the peasants. The peasants were included in both eras and are at the lowest part of the pyramid.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

In the 1500s and the 1600s the feudal system was beginning to fall. Different countries were trying new different types of governments instead of the dysfunctional feudal system. The feudal system consisted of many different nobles ruling over their own land. It was not a uniform system of ruling over the country. There were small city-states run by a singular ruler.

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

The Middle Ages was a period that lasted from about 500 to 1500(OI). There were kings and queens, nobles, knights, and peasants (Doc. 1). People were treated and respected differently according to their class(OI). There were special relationships and responsibilities that everyone had. In the Middle Ages feudalism affected people’s lives economically, socially, and politically.

Read More
174 Words | 1 Pages

Conclusion: The Feudal system, like many others, has its flaws. But overall, The Feudal

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

The feudalism system for England starts from peasant for the losts and merchants and tax collectors after that military people protecting high ranking people and then comes noble class people who are born into money or buy or gets deeds. It affected Democracy when people started to learned how to read and write and they wanted the same right and realized how unfair it was and fought for their right of a normal life and a thing was that getting tax from people was a thing and know it still is but sometimes it is use for good things but also bad things. Feudalisation was somewhat the bases of democracy big thing in difference and many in the same like how each one has a leader but one leader can control anything and one has the supreme court and the

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Feudalism was a social system during the dark ages. On the top of the feudalism triangle was the king, just below him are the lords and nobles, below them are the knights that protected the king(dom), at the bottom of the triangle were the peasants. They were the slaves on the fifes (DBQ#2, Doc 1). “For the majority of Europeans, life was hard. Serfs / Peasants were required to work the land.”

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

Politics also play a part in this dynamic on a large and small scale, from the board members who must campaign for their position to individuals engaging in self-promotion in hopes of improving their position. Legitimate formal power and direction comes from the top of the pyramid on down through the ranks. Perched at the top of the power pyramid are five elected county school board members and the county superintendent of schools. Below them are five assistant superintendents and at the next level down are a combination coordinators and program managers. Lastly, all other staff make up the base of this formation, having the least amount of influence and dependent on mid-level managers for resources, information and approval of decisions.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

However, this could be better seen in their form of government. Feudalism was a system that had land owners at the top (Kings and lords) and those who worked the land and keep the community safe at the bottom. It was basically impossible to move between social classes, and a desire to keep the rich with the rich meant that one couldn’t marry into money It was a social, economic, political, and legal system that stood in place for hundreds of years. The system, however meant that the government was weak, and it rarely stretched far; the larger the kingdom, the harder it was to keep it working. It also meant there were a lot of poor people living in the fifteen hundreds.

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

The text states, “The superintendent did have enormous power of initiative in virtually all matters concerning the schools: the appointment of staff, the selection of textbooks, plans and contracts for buildings, the determination of the curriculum, and normal decisions about everyday running of the schools” (159). When examining the formal education of our current educational institutions, it is evident that the power structure lies with superintendents, school boards and principals who share expectations on how classrooms should be run as well as decision making for the betterment of the institution and students. Overall, formal education has evolved and will continue to evolve as educators search for their perception of the “one best system” for their students. Throughout the history of education, power structure and social class matters have influenced how educators implement regulations, interact with community members and fellow educators, but most importantly, the education of students so that they may be instilled with the skills and confidence to further themselves as

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Japanese and European Feudalism are more different than similar because not only do all of their classes interact with

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

School governors - are there set the strategic direction for the school. Support the work of the head teacher and staff, they are responsible for making sure the school provides a good quality of education for all pupils. Overseeing the financial spending of the school making sure it's well spent. Decisions about the school have to be run by the school governors ensuring it is in the best interests for the school , pupils and staff. Senior management team - are there to make sure the school is doing the best it can for its pupils .

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, this cause and effect explains feudalism’s creation in the Western European Dark

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

Long before the Renaissance, government was based on feudalism, the idea of dividing society based on class. People earned a set wage for their class’ jobs. Children that were born into a family were the same class as their family. Also, thinking was deeply religious and even art and sculpture all were based on religious figures. However, humanists quashed this idea.

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

In the feudal system, people pledged loyalty to a lord—a ruler or powerful landholder. In return, they received protection from that lord. At the bottom of the system were serfs, peasants who were not free to leave the lord’s land without permission.(History Alive, 2011, page17.)The fall of the Roman Empire led to a period of uncertainty and danger. Europeans developed the system of feudalism to help provide economic and social stability

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

When one thinks about feudalism, the first factor that may come to mind is how the lifestyles were affected during the era. The lifestyle during feudalism has several similarities to the lifestyle during high school, but there are quite a few important dissimilarities. The various achievements, routines, and loyalty differ greatly between the complex feudalism era and the challenging modern day high school system, causing one’s life to alter in various ways. One contrasting characteristic between feudalism and high school is the achievements. During feudalism, honor was known as the highest and respectable achievement.

Read More

More about Feudalism Vs High School Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document