ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

1000 Words4 Pages

Just think, a tiny white and brown bunny rabbit sitting on a lab table not knowing what is about to happen to him, little does he know, he is about to be injected with a strange substance that could probably result in burning, shocking, poisoning, addiction to drugs, and/or brain-damage (“Cruelty”). Imagine being locked in a small cage inside of a dark room with no control of mating, eating, or living to see another day inside of the horrendous room. Millions of animals are legally undergoing this torture from scientists on a daily bases. The animals who suffer will never be the same afterwards, they are enduring pain on a regular without any painkillers or medication in general (“Cruelty”). Mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, …show more content…

“The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials” (“Animal Testing is”). Animal testing is not necessary and the technology in medicine can still advance even without the unwilling sacrifice of someone’s potential pet. If people were more educated on the facts behind animal testing, they would understand that testing on an animal is not a clear representation of how that chemical will interact with a human body. Different cell, tissue, and nervous systems, and how they interact inside the body, could produce many variations of results. A distressed, tortured, and inactive rabbit who is injected with a chemical or medicine that is meant for a human who is having issues in another category, would easily be misrepresented (“Animal Testing is”). Even with all the testing that occurs on these innocent animals, there is always going to be a human who is the first to try a drug, and in essence they are truly the test subject because this experiment is more of a comparison to how the drug will work (“Animal Testing

Show More
Related
887 Words | 4 Pages

According to one of the largest organizations for social change with 4.3 million members: Do Something, the article “11 Facts About Animal Testing” states, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.” Even after scientists force innocent animals into excruciating pain, the results are proven to be meaningless. This delineates how impractical animal testing is. By the same token, according to Pro-Con, a nonprofit public charity that provides research on more than 50 controversial topics, “Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states that ‘it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.’” This demonstrates how distinct animals and humans are and proves we should not use animals as a representation people.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

The way animals are treated in labs is unnecessary and cruel. In an article called, “Animal Testing is Bad Science,” the Animal Welfare Act is mentioned; “It allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged.” In that same article, it explains that painkillers are not required to be used. Scientists are demeaning the value of innocent animal lives, using them as test subjects, and forgetting they have a nervous system and brain that feels pain the same as you and I. Fortunately, the following recent discovery has saved millions of animals’ lives. From “Breakthroughs That Might Mean the End of Animal Testing,” I learned of a substitute for animals in the lab.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

In the past, testing has been conducted on human patients, often without their consent. This is far more ethically problematic than testing on rats, mice, and even dogs or other primates. While testing on humans may be more accurate, when a new treatment seems propitious “it is then tested in animals to see whether it seems to be safe and effective” (Source H). Additionally, there are strict regulations on animal testing, and there is a strict vetting procedure before animal testing is started. Further, Source D shows that as well as a sizable decrease in the number of animals tested in the US since 1973, only a small percentage of tests are run on dogs, cats and primates, and according to Source A, 95% of tests are done on rodents.

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

The effect of the drugs in the animal results in a different outcome when used by humans. The Thalidomide baby disaster in 1957 shows us why animal testing is at such a high risk for humans. A morning

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

Did you know that 92 percent of of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work (Do Something)? Everyday animals are harmed in cruel testing for scientific purposes. In 2015 a beagle named Nelly was shoot then abandon on the side of the road because the test she was being used for were over. Just like so many other animals Nelly had gone thru cruel testing for most of her life and was deprived of the love and comfort that she needed. In this essay information will be provided to explain what animal testing is, why the testing is not valid, and that there are other testing methods.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in United States labs every year. (1) Animals have been used since the 1920s to test the safety and effectiveness of drugs and vaccines in the United States. Animals are the sweetest and most adorable things in the world, I don’t know one person who doesn’t like animals. Companies are taking animals like mice, birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, and even some cats and dogs to test their products. They are hurting animals and killing them when they are done using them.

Read More
1429 Words | 6 Pages

Animals put under experiments endure traumatic and avoidable tests. Hajar (2011) suggests that a number of animal experiments are wasteful, harsh, and ridiculous. This researcher states that in one experiment pregnant rabbits were given cocaine with the aim of studying the effects of drug use on their offspring. In another research, cats were shot in the skull to demonstrate that this kind of wound affects breathing (Saraf & Kumaraswamy, 2013). The nature of animal experimentation has hardly changed over the last few decades implying that millions of animals continue to anguish in avoidable tests annually (Saraf & Kumaraswamy, 2013).

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

New drugs for people have been tested on animals whether you're in the UK, Europe, the USA or Japan"(Peterkin). It’s a torture that animals go through in science

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

According to PETA, “Animal testing produce drugs too. 92% of drugs passed by animal tests immediately failed when first tried on a human because the drug was dangerous or unneeded.” Animal experiments extend the duration of the suffering of people, waiting for effective cures by misleading experimenters. This wastes money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human relevant research. People are wasting animal lives for unneeded drugs or

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

The use of animals for scientific experiments that benefit soley humans is cruel and sadistic. An animals life are not for our personal use of experimenting and torturing species in order for us to advance in science. There is little to no laws or regulation to conducting animal testing and the number of testing an it is unfortunately rising in other countries instead of declining. The United States is one of the top 10 countries that conduct experiments on animals (“Cruelty to Animals in Laboratories”). Even though many state that animal testing is the only way t safely trial medical experiments, over the years new alternatives and examination has been done that can bring an end to animal testing all together.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

a neurologist, public health specialist, and author, «If you were volunteering for a clinical trial, there is more than 90 percent chance that the drug that tested safe and effective in animals will be ineffective or unsafe in you. » However, not only does animal testing put humans in more danger, by giving false expectations of safety, but drugs that fail in animal models cause us to potentially ignore real cures. One of the best known examples of a drug that failed animal tests but is quite effective in humans is aspirin. According to the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, «One of our most relied-upon pain relievers, Aspirin (Acetylsalicylic acid), causes teratogenic malformations in mice, rats, dogs, cats, rabbits, and monkeys.

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

Hope Ferdowsian, assistant professor of medicine at the George Washington University, and Nancy Beck, a scientific and policy adviser with the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, report that researching on animals does not effectively predict the effects of chemicals on the human vascular and neurological systems (Ferdowsian & Beck 3). Because animal testing cannot accurately determine how certain drugs will affect these systems, its use becomes unnecessary. Furthermore, Dr. Natalie Burden, Dr. Fiona Sewell, and Dr. Kathryn Chapman, program leaders at the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research for the United Kingdom, describe one underlying problem of animal testing by asking, if a chemical is safe for a rat or mouse, “is it acceptable for a human to be exposed to it” (Burden, Sewell, & Chapman 2)? Simply stated, human bodies often respond to chemicals differently when compared to other animals. An experiment testing the effects of a new drug could cause a deadly reaction in a small rodent, yet pose no major threat to a human.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

Once the experiments with the animals are completed, clinical trials start on humans and they are the first set of people to be tested. Not only are there going to be a set of people that are the first to be tested on, but barely any drugs work in clinical trials. “Ninety-two percent of drugs—those that have been tested on animals and in vitro—do not make it through Phase 1 of human clinical trials” (“Medical Testing on Animals is Cruel and Unnecessary” 3). So, even if we do test on animals, humans eventually have to be tested on and the drug successes on the animals didn’t work on humans.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Should animals be suffering just because humans are trying to advance our medical techniques? Should they be forced to eat? Should people be allowed to torture them this way? Do you think so? In fact, more than 100 million animals are killed each year during scientific and commercial testing, in the U.S alone.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document