Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

756 Words4 Pages

The definition of testing is to take measures to check the quality, performance, or reliability of (something), especially before putting it into widespread use or practice. This simple word test is bringing distraught to animals all over the world. Imagine if you were stuck in a cage deprived of food and sitting in loneliness for your whole life from birth. Each year, more than 100 million animals in U.S laboratories are killed, including: mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds. This is all for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing (Peta). Would you like it if your pet ended up getting killed due to an experiment?Animal …show more content…

A large amount of medicines tested safe on animals ended up harming humans, and in bad instances killing them. We simply don't have the same genes as a 70 kg mouse. There are many medicines and diseases that have worked or we have cured in mice and other animals, but they become fatal or incurable in humans. For example A 2004 study from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that 92 percent of drugs entering clinical trials following animal testing failed to be approved. Of those approved, half are withdrawn due to severe or lethal effects not detected during animal tests (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). Dr. Richard Klausner is the former director of the National Cancer Institute. He states, “We have cured cancer in mice for decades, it simply didn't work in humans.” He’s further proving that results can be very inaccurate and unpredictable. Drugs intended to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients, that previously were tested in mice, failed in nearly 150 human critical test (National Academy of Sciences). Drugs intended to prevent strokes, tested in animals, failed in humans (National Academy of Sciences).There are many more instances where drugs had to get pulled of of shelves because they were tested fine to animals. Yet none of the treatments tested in humans showed clinically beneficial. Not just are the tests unpredictable, there are also other ways to