ipl-logo

Plo And Hezbollah Comparison

521 Words3 Pages

The PlO is a terrorist group located all over the middle east and their goal is to achieve the national goals of the Palestine people, and the establishment of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capitol. Hezbollah is a terrorist group located in Lebanon their main goal is the establishment of an Islamic government across the Arab world that will liberate Jerusalem and the entire area of the present day state of Israel. There are many differences between these two terrorist groups, but there are many similarities. Some of the differences between the PLO and Hezbollah are that they both have two completely different goals, PLO wants to create a Palestinian state all with Jerusalem as its capitol, and Hezbollah wants to establish an Islamic government across the Arab world that will liberate Jerusalem and Israel. The PLO and Hezbollah are similar because of how they are funded. The PLO is funded by donations from people that support the group, Hezbollah is funded by people who put donations in the two handed Hezbollah collection bins. …show more content…

The PLO are recruiting people by just letting them in if they want to join the group. The PLO have many ways to get people to join because they are all over the middle east, unlike Hezbollah where they are set in one location. The ideology of Hezbollah is, it was largely formed with the aid of Ayatollah Khomeini's followers in the early 1980’s in order to spread Islamic revolution and follows a distinct version of the Shi’a ideology. Ideology of the PLO is; it was formulated in 1964 in the Palestinian National Covenant. The document is a combative anti-Zionist statement dedicated to the restoration of the Palestinian homeland, it has no reference to religion. In 1968 the charter was replaced by a comprehensively revised

Show More
Related
289 Words | 2 Pages

Experts suggest that Hezbollah has the network and “necessary structures to conduct terrorist strikes in case it serves its interests”(47) With this comes the remarkable fact that the media tends to indicate that individuals affiliated to Hezbollah generate large amount of money from illicit activities and that Hezbollah profits from it.(48) What is frequently downplayed is the fact that the money channelled to Hezbollah is from individual donations, which seem to be a result of “personal sympathies rather than systematic cooperation. ”(49) The fact that Hezbollah only benefits from these criminal enterprises to the extent to which individual sympathizer donate suggest that Hezbollah may not actually be masterminding any criminal activity in

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

Their motives were religious and political, and therefore establishes the similarities between the two types of extremists. Both

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

out of business.” But Bush then goes on to reference the slew of terrorist organizations that still exist, “Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad.”. By making this comparison,

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

The charter was also a stepping stone for the creation of the United Nations

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

I completely agree with your analysis between Los Zetas and the Hezbollah. On one hand you have Los Zetas, a Mexican Cartel who is a serious threat to the Mexican government. On the other hand you have Hezbollah, the Lebanese terror group that is a Hybrid threat to Lebanon and other countries. Los Zetas were once upon a time former Mexican Army soldiers who broke off from another drug cartel. This in my mind makes them a hybrid threat in two ways.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Terrorist group and political party, Hezbollah, meaning Party of God, was formed in 1982 from the Shia block in Lebanon. Led by leader Hassan Nasrallah, who became leader on February 16, 1992 after the death of Musawi in an Israeli air stike. Hassan Nasrallah, also referred to as 'al-Sayyid Hassan' which means descendent of Muhammad through his grandson Husain ibn Ali. Hassan Nasrallah was born into a Shia family, studied and taught religion at the school of Amal.

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

They have many differences in tactics, strategies, and motives. “The stark contrast between Al Qaeda's large-scale, dramatic attacks and ISIS' slow territorial conquest also reflects the differences between the two organizations' ultimate goals” (Bertrand). “Whereas al Qaeda's primary enemy has always been the United States, ISIS targets are much closer to home: Namely, apostate Shi'ite regimes such as Bashar Assad's government in Syria and Haider al-Abadi's in Iraq that impede the creation of a "pure", radically sectarian Islamic state” (Bertrand). The brutality that each organization displays are very different.

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

The first issue is the fact of facing non-governmental combatants that blend in with society. It is a fine line for modern political correctness to not stereotype a person due to race, creed, or culture. Dealing with this balance is due to the concern of fear for being caught into a civil lawsuit, a trend that has become increasingly popular and can destroy a law enforcement officer’s career if they accuse the wrong person. The second issue being that Hezbollah uses misconstrued doctrine of Islam to convince people to sacrifice themselves for the cause. It is a surprisingly difficult and complicated war to fight against someone who wishes and trains to die for their beliefs.

Read More
1451 Words | 6 Pages

Both, the BR and the RAF, referred to the Marxist-Leninist tradition, however, their ideology was based more on the Trotskyian idea of permanent revolution and on the Maoist version of Marxism. Moreover, they praised the Cambodian revolutionary Pol Pot and its idea of society purification from bourgeoisie and capitalism. Furthermore, these urban terrorists wanted to be placed in the world of self-determination fighters, such as Latin American revolutionaries1 7-10. Likewise, these groups looked at Vietnam war as an example to take to fight capitalism and the USA. Finally, there was a strict link between Palestinian freedom-fighters and German and Italian terrorists.

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

There are differences between political piracy and maritime terrorism. Piracy is a crime done by greed while terrorism is distinct from piracy in a very straight forward manner. For political piracy, acts of maritime terrorism are motivated to promote a political, ideological or religious cause. What distinguishes political piracy from ordinary piracy is the focus on violence as a means of creating havoc or creating fear in a population or the general public. In compare to other forms of piracy, where aims are hault by economic gain, the objective of maritime terrorism is the violence strategic attacks.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

Just like us, these hybrid threats are trying to shape the operational environment in order to better their agenda. They can do this in just about any number of way. Infiltrating the government or political arenas, in my opinion, would probably be the easiest way for them to gain and hold on to almost all the different variables in the operational environment. If they were able to persuade government officials to join their cause that may give them access to the military, the infrastructure, and the information that particular government has access to or controls. Because the government is normally the voice of the people and can sway public opinion one way or another, the

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

Syria's interest in continuing terrorist attacks in southern Lebanon has enabled the organization to maintain its regulations in the territories of this country and be the only military force that is not yet disarmed. The Syrians prevented Hezbollah's military capacity from undermining Lebanon's rule, under the pretext of its opposition to Israeli occupation. At the same time, the Syrians strengthened their dictates on the organization, and were interested in calming the situation in southern Lebanon. Using undercover names such as Islamic Jihad, Revolutionary Organisation for Justice and Islamic Resistance, and having the approval of religious leaders, Hezbollah executed a series of major attacks against Israeli, American and Southern Multinational Forces of Lebanon. Later attacks intensified and showed better qualification, especially before the Peace Process.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Middle East Peace Summit Paper Hezbollah has affected and impacted the very strongly Arab-Israeli conflict due to their many attacks against Israel, and their ultimate intention of destroying Israel, which puts them on the side of the Arabs. Hezbollah is political and military group in Lebanon consisting of Shi’a muslims. It came about in 1982, in the midst of the Arab-Israeli conflict, in response to the invasion of Lebanon by Israelis. The invasion of Lebanon began in 1978, where Israelis pushed the Palestine Liberation Organization past the Litani River, yet their campaigns against Israeli continued.

Read More
2373 Words | 10 Pages

The members, nine in total, were amended for a period of maximum six years. There was a quite specific rule: there couldn’t be more than two members of any one

Read More
1410 Words | 6 Pages

Abstract Sectarianism holds hegemonic power over Lebanon that is resistant to challenges of change. Institutional and foreign actors serve to instill and reinforce sectarianism from above while political and economic elites play on sectarian sentiments to maintain and enhance their power, contributing to sectarianism from below. These efforts ensure that the Lebanese subjects remain affiliated with their respective sects, compartmentalized in self-managed communities. Introduction Sectarian democracy, the political system adopted by Lebanon, fuses formal and informal sectarian and democratic components. Democracy is manifested in the way power is organized: upholding democratic principles such as the rights of individuals through elections,

Read More

More about Plo And Hezbollah Comparison

Related Topics

Open Document