Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The necessity of animal testing
The necessity of animal testing
Benefit of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The necessity of animal testing
The necessity of animal testing
Benefit of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The necessity of animal testing
Animal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.
According to a study done by the FDA, ninety-two percent of drugs, which were produced from animal models, failed to be approved for regular use by humans after they were tested on humans (neavs.org). This means that the vast majority of drugs made from animal testing were not able to help humans and the suffering of those animal models was simply a waste. Elias Zerhouni, who is a medical doctor, researcher, and the former director of the National Institutes of Health, even went as far to say that animal testing has led research to stray away from being used for comprehension of human biology, and we should refocus away from animal testing to get back on track for medical progress (McManus). This shows that animal testing is not helping us understand and cure human diseases. Some people believe that such examples as the use of mice to produce Gleevec, a drug that fights cancer, is reason enough to say that animal testing benefits humans medically (amprogress.org).
On the other hand, animal testing is cruel and inhumane. During animal research, animals are forced into extremely painful experiments. They are subjected to things such as force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, infliction of burns and wounds to study the healing process, and multiple others. One of these painful experiments is called The Draize eye test. The site Pro Con explains how this involves scientists clipping rabbits’ eyelids open in order to pour cosmetic products, such as shampoo, into the eyes of the animals (1).
Would you standby watching if you saw anyone getting tortured? The disadvantage of animal testing is that they are unethical to use for our selfish purposes in products that might be a part of our everyday lives. Animal testing is not the solution to getting the results that we need in our experiments. With this in mind, should animal testing still be permitted for scientific research? I believe strongly that animal testing should not be permitted for research purposes because animals have senses and feeling just like humans, tests on animals show different results on humans due to the fact that they are biologically different, and it has many negative environmental consequences.
Moreover, testing for cosmetics is obviously evil to animals. The fact that people take small helpless animals to torture them, so human could feel better. In the article “Animal Testing-A Necessary Evil?” Paterson reports that “Animals are also not just exposed to short periods of physical restraint but also prolonged periods. They can be deprived of food and water and wounds are inflicted, along with burns and other injuries in order to study healing.
Multiple experiments have been written to discuss if testing animals is an ethical decision and if it truly makes a difference in the human medical field. Over 3 million animals are being used for experiments every year, yet they don’t necessarily contribute to humans. Doctors have proven diseases that occur naturally in animals, are not the same as human diseases, which can cause conflict within the results. During the experiments, animals can subject to serve pain and torture that’s not good for their bodies. It provides us with ethically questionability; does it truly make sense to test animals?
There are three different things that we can do to make animal testing stop. First, according to the ASPCA, there is no reason for animal testing because of advanced technology. Instead of testing on animals, companies can use vitro screening methods. Vitro screens and methods test for endpoints which can determine any potential risks to humans. The machine's base the information on 3D human living tissues, to reach a mechanistic understanding of the skin’s biological response to the product.
Then the last alternative form of animal testing is microdosing. Microdosing involves minuscule amounts of a test substance are given to human volunteers so researchers can track how said
How would you feel if you found out your precious Fido or Fiona was in a laboratory being used as a test subject? Take the feelings you had if you found out and apply them to the animals who are actually in the lab. Do these animals not deserve the same sympathy? The products you may have on now could have been tested on an animal. The testing they endure I consider to be inhumane and unnecessary.
The topic for today would be that if animal testing should be stopped. I would like to stand with the pro side because animal cruelty is a very serious problem to animal kind today. They can be argued with several reasons such as, it is cruel and inhumane treatment, it can lead to misleading research, and plenty of animal lives are wasted and we do not want to raise it higher. My first argument should be that it is cruel and inhumane acts or treatment.
Animal testing, sometimes called vivo testing or animal experiment, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. They are widely conducted in labs, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Animal testing is mainly used for testing, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetics testing. Those experiments are mainly risky for animals, sometimes even kill testing subjects, which caused protest from some organizations like WAP (World Animal Protection). In 2012, one of the biggest animal farm for Animal testing called Green Hill was closed under stress of
Have you ever wondered how scientists develop the medicine you take when you catch a cold? Within the lab wall, millions of actions can be taken against animals, after many years of evolution “Animal testing” remains an active argument, Animal testing has been there since late 1800 when Louis Pasteur applied his tests on chicken to develop a drug to treat pox and since then it has taken the scientific world by strike that left the humanity with numerous side effects, There’s no doubt that alternative methods are more accurate, factual and detailed even if there are scientists who still believe the complete opposite, that medical research should depend mainly on animal tests despite its physical and psychological harm. Firstly; Drugs
There is also testing being done with human volunteers today. The method is called “microdsing” and it can provide information of the safety of a new drug before it is used in large scale human trials. The volunteers in these experiments are given very small dose of a drug and are carefully supervised to see the effects of the drug on the
Animal testing has been occurring forever. It can even comeback to the ancient times of the greeks and romans. Doctors would dissect animals with the interest to gain knowledge. But even back then, one practicing doctor stated that he would rather use a pig as his subject because he wanted to, “ avoid seeing the unpleasant expression of an ape” (Monamy 9). The thought of it being right or wrong to use animals for testing has always been questioned.
Hailee Etheridge First negative Animal Testing Should animal testing be banned? Mr. Chairman, honorable judges, worthy opponents, ladies and gentlemen: This is the resolution for today’s debate, resolved: should the government ban all animal testing? The question tends to be a touchy subject throughout the world because of the negativity that comes with testing animals. As the first negative I do agree that animal testing is cruel but without animal testing we would not have a lot of things that we have today.