ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

422 Words2 Pages

On the other hand, animal testing is cruel and inhumane. During animal research, animals are forced into extremely painful experiments. They are subjected to things such as force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, infliction of burns and wounds to study the healing process, and multiple others. One of these painful experiments is called The Draize eye test. The site Pro Con explains how this involves scientists clipping rabbits’ eyelids open in order to pour cosmetic products, such as shampoo, into the eyes of the animals (1). The clips prevent the rabbit from blinking the product away, sometimes for days at a time. Common symptoms include redness, swelling, discharge, ulceration, …show more content…

This test involves finding out which dose of a chemical will kill 50% of the animals being used in the experiment. According to the International Association Against Painful Experiments on Animals, it is widely used to test the toxicity of household products, pesticides, cosmetics, drugs, weed killers and industrial products (1). Products are usually orally dosed using a tube inserted down the animal’s throat. The product is then pumped into the animal’s stomach and scientists wait 14 days to see if the animal survived the dosage or not. Other forms of dosing include forced breathing of the vapour, application of the substance to the animal’s skin, and injection of the product into the animal’s system. Common signs of poisoning include tears, diarrhoea, discharge and bleeding from the eyes or mouth, and convulsions (2). No pain relief is given to the animals throughout this long, painful process. If the test subject happens to survive the substance is judged to be less toxic and the corresponding commercial is informed to lower the hazard classification. The Draize eye test and the LD50 test are only two examples of the hundreds of immensely painful tests performed on animals. The US Department of Agriculture, USDA, reported in 2010 that 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while given no anesthesia for pain relief (1). This included 1,395 primates, 5,996 rabbits, 33,652 guinea pigs, and 48,015 hamsters

Show More
Related
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Regulatory agencies in most countries require testing of consumer products, medicines, and industrial and agricultural chemicals to identify potential health and safety hazards,thereby enabling appropriate hazard classification and labeling, which in turn enables apprised decisions about responsible use, storage, and disposal. All toxicity test methods utilized for regulatory purposes must be predicated on sound science and able to adequately identify hazards. Besides the major concern of ethics, there are few more disadvantages of animal experimentation like requisite of adept manpower, time consuming protocols and high cost. Also the pain, distress and death experienced by the animals during scientific experiments have been a debating issue

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Concerns are raised when animals are subjected to pain and toxins during testing. Studies show stress on the animals from routine

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

Most commonly, dogs are used in toxicity tests, “which rarely use any form of pain relief.” The symptoms they suffer include “vomiting, diarrhoea, convulsions, shivering, anorexia and hyperexcitement; plus eye, liver, kidney, heart and lung damage, and of course death.” This is very unethical. It is also completely unnecessary.

Read More
1174 Words | 5 Pages

To determine whether a product is toxic, scientists do a test called the “Lethal Dose 50”. “LD” stands for “lethal dose”; the “50” means that half the animals, or 50 percent of the animals forced to endure testing the product, will die at that dose” (www.thoughtco.com). The LD50 test usually averages sixty to sixty-five percent accuracy. Whenever in vitro testing is used, it measures eighty-five percent accuracy. Not only will the information gathered show how a human would react to a new product, but it also shows a higher accuracy in

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

As stated by this group of animals rights activists; many of these test are controversial because of animals having to suffer for human benefit. (“Animal Experimentation: An Overview”, Paragraph 1) All pharmaceuticals, food additives, and garden chemicals that are sold and/or used in the United States must first be tested on experimental animals which causes many harsh effects on the animals. (“Animal Experimentation: An Overview, Paragraph 2) One test commonly tested on experiment, rabbits is the “Draize” Test. It is to test the irritant level it causes which in most cases until perfected it blinds the rabbit or destroys the cornea, lens, and more of the rabbit's eye.

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Humane Society, registration of a common pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12,000 animals. Animal testing is the practice of the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of drugs. The practice of animal testing has multiple sides, and explanations which

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

“These animals receive tests for substances that will never actually be used… it seems the animal died in vain” (Murnaghan 1). To take a life in such a painful way for no reason is a horrible thing to do. It is immoral, the scientists quickly appear to be that of murderers in this case; to take a life for no true purpose. There is also an extreme difficulty to get animals to test with, the specific animals are bred to be tested on. “Animals are expensive, there’s a lot of hassle and paperwork, and there are the extremists…”

Read More
614 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are harmed and even killed during the testing. If the animal does not die during the test, then the researchers kill them once the experiment is done. They either force the animals to breath in toxic fumes, have their skin burned off, or even have drills cut holes into their skull. If the experiment is successful for the researchers, it does not help the animals at all. The type of chemicals they would use can have major health defects later on that can possibly cause cancer or heart failure.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

During some tests, they pump substances into the animal’s stomach to see how long it takes for them to die. Blindness,

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

The testers put droplets of the chemical into the restrained animal’s eye without any relief for pain. This method is mostly used on rabbits and mice. Animals that are mostly harmed in animal testing may include, but is not limited to mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds. Another method of testing is giving a “lethal dose” which means that the animals are given enough of the product to kill them. That method allows for the testers to know how much is “lethal” to consume.

Read More
1907 Words | 8 Pages

Animals are exposed to a variety of different chemicals that range from eye irritant, to diarrhea, to severe pain, and to death [1]. Animal testing is not required in the United States by any law. The law states to “employ whatever testing is appropriate and effective for substantiating the safety of their products.” According to PETA, companies should accept other methods to ensure their products meet safety requirements. In 2014, animals that were reported in Victoria, New

Read More
1928 Words | 8 Pages

The third type of testing is injection testing. Injection testing’s main purpose is drug testing. What occurs in this type of research is that the animals are injected with a disease or virus and then they are injected with the drug to see how effective it was in curing the animal and what side effects are observed. When anti-viruses or drugs have negative effects on the animals or fails to heal the animal of the illness, than they are euthanized. Therefore, scientists do not just allow the animal to suffer, but instead ends their life painlessly.

Read More
1600 Words | 7 Pages

Hair, cosmetics and personal care products are used by many people around the world. The purpose of testing these products is to ensure that there is no irritation on the scalp, eyes, lips or skin. Tests on animals need to take place in order to test the harming level of a product. Researching on animals allows effective results allowing scientist to label a product with helpful information such as the its resistance to heat, and if its flammable. Experimenting on animals allows reliable information as to what will happen while using the

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Testing on animals has been a hotly contested issue for hundreds of years. Every year a colossal number of animals are used for testing and most of them die due to ill treatment and stressful conditions. On that account, experimenting on animals used to develop new medicine should be reduced or prohibited, because it is ethically wrong and unreliable. On top of that there are methods that substitute the testing on animals Body History of animals experiments in brief The animal testing has a long history.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

They do this method were they squirt the chemical in their eyes then put stocks on their eyes to prevent the animal from scratch their eyes out. About 6% of animals who are tested on experience pain. (Sunni 20, 32, 35, 47, 45, 33) Most animals that are tested on either die or go blind. (Stiver)

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document