ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1600 Words7 Pages

When it comes to the topic of testing the consumer products before putting them out on the market, a controversial issue has been whether animal testing is still viable or not. On one hand, many people are against animal testing and experimentation, arguing that alternatives such as computer modeling, and other scientific inventions would be as effective as animal testing. On the other hand, some argue that it’s viable, it makes products safe for us to use, and has helped discover treatments for diseases. I agree that animal testing is viable because it advances human and animal health, allowing us to move forward in life, and live a long and healthy existence.
Consumer products such as: chemicals, drugs, and food are necessities that humans …show more content…

Hair, cosmetics and personal care products are used by many people around the world. The purpose of testing these products is to ensure that there is no irritation on the scalp, eyes, lips or skin. Tests on animals need to take place in order to test the harming level of a product. Researching on animals allows effective results allowing scientist to label a product with helpful information such as the its resistance to heat, and if its flammable. Experimenting on animals allows reliable information as to what will happen while using the …show more content…

Richard Klausner, former director of the National Cancer Institute to Los Angeles Times, wrote an article on the history of cancer research on animals. Klausner himself states, “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades – and it simply didn’t work in humans” (Klausner). Klausner is stating that the treatment that was intended to work successfully in humans, was only successful in mice. Should animal testing be stopped because it might not work? Using a mouse as a way to develop a treatment for cancer may not work, however, that is just one method conducted by one person for developing a treatment to cure cancer. There are animals specially used for every experiment conducted and for the treatment of cancer mice are not used, but monkeys are. Having more than one scientist conduct the same experiments will decrease the chances of false information from leaving the

Show More
Related
1018 Words | 5 Pages

According to a study done by the FDA, ninety-two percent of drugs, which were produced from animal models, failed to be approved for regular use by humans after they were tested on humans (neavs.org). This means that the vast majority of drugs made from animal testing were not able to help humans and the suffering of those animal models was simply a waste. Elias Zerhouni, who is a medical doctor, researcher, and the former director of the National Institutes of Health, even went as far to say that animal testing has led research to stray away from being used for comprehension of human biology, and we should refocus away from animal testing to get back on track for medical progress (McManus). This shows that animal testing is not helping us understand and cure human diseases. Some people believe that such examples as the use of mice to produce Gleevec, a drug that fights cancer, is reason enough to say that animal testing benefits humans medically (amprogress.org).

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

In the past, testing has been conducted on human patients, often without their consent. This is far more ethically problematic than testing on rats, mice, and even dogs or other primates. While testing on humans may be more accurate, when a new treatment seems propitious “it is then tested in animals to see whether it seems to be safe and effective” (Source H). Additionally, there are strict regulations on animal testing, and there is a strict vetting procedure before animal testing is started. Further, Source D shows that as well as a sizable decrease in the number of animals tested in the US since 1973, only a small percentage of tests are run on dogs, cats and primates, and according to Source A, 95% of tests are done on rodents.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Testing on animals is not accurate, it is a waste of many resources, and it is unnecessary. Animal testing is not an accurate way to find cures for humans. Almost all tests that pass on animals do not pass on humans. The reason for this is because humans and the animals being tested on are not the same genetically. It does not make sense to test on animals, because the products that are being tested are not going to be used on the animals.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

Take a moment and think about your daily routine. You wash your hair with your Head & Shoulders shampoo, wash your body with your Dove soap, do your makeup with your favorite MAC or Maybelline products, and spray some Marc Jacob’s perfume and then you are ready to go, right? Well, did you ever consider how these products are tested before being sold? It is said that, “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year” (11 Facts About Animal Testing). A number of companies around the United States use animal testing as a method to examine the safeness of a product.

Read More
180 Words | 1 Pages

Cancer research has been going on for years. Experts can now cure cancer in a mouse, but not in humans. Animal testing is said to be unreliable and wasteful. Majority of drugs fail on humans, even though it works on the animal that was tested on. There is about ninety-three life threatening drug side effects when taking medication and only nineteen percent of them could be found in animal testing.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

Yes, we did but the intended purpose of this whole thing was to cure cancer for humans not animals. This might sound like a far-fetched idea but is one to consider. We have seen this idea in films, a couple are Planet of the Apes, 21 days Later, I am Legend, although they are considered Sci-fi no one really knows what happens in a science-lab they only release the information after the experiment which is the correct way if you use the scientific method which I’m sure everyone is familiar with. My Next argument against Animal Testing is the morality of all of this why would someone want to kill or Harm something that doesn’t have any problems with it at all. They have to use a healthy animal to start off with to use as a variable to notice the effects of their testing, this is not fair nor right to the animal.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

In various cases animals who had certain diseases and conditions have been cured through this testing. Although it’s not a walk in the park for some of these animals, their sacrifice does not go in vain. Michael Brooks pointed out in his article titled The Truth About Animal Testing that, “In the 1990s, deaths from breast cancer dropped by nearly a third. Much of that success was due to the introduction of tamoxifen, a treatment that helps prevent breast cancer among those with a family history of the disease” (2012). He continues to explain that this discovery was made through the usage of mice with

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

However, medical researchers study animals to gain a practical knowledge about how the new inventions in medicine influence to our(both, human’s and animal’s) body, because, it has been proven that human beings and many animals have the similarities in organ systems and body processes. One of the valuable laboratory findings is the treatment of cancer, and heart diseases. So, it seems like it is not reasonable to prevent experimentations. Nevertheless, PETA organization find out lend to support to the claim that humans and animals are not comparable, so the results of animal experiments are meaningless, because it turns that even both of them have similar cancer type in brain, but the process of development of the disease and the reaction for the drugs is not the same. As PETA reports, drugs experiment on mice helps only them, not for

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

Testing on animals has helped to cure many diseases over the years. Every time a new vaccine or medicine is given to the public is probably been tested on animals to make sure that it is safe. No one wants to take or drink drugs that are harmful to them. Colin Blakemore states, “Patient might not know that the powerful new drugs Avastin (for vowel, breast and lung cancer) and Herceptin (for breast cancer) were developed after research on mice.” In other words, Blakemore asserts that usually when patient get the cures they don’t realize that they have been established due to the tests on animals.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Why do scientists test on animals? Shouldn’t they stop? When testing if a product and medicine is safe to use people turn to animals. Many people worry about using animals for testing whether or not if it is fair for both cases. Scientists are questioning it if there is a way to help the sick without having to test on animals.

Read More
1907 Words | 8 Pages

Also, society awareness on how products are tested may influence consumption which effects the overall economy and health of society. Although the biggest argument for chemical testing on animals is to protect humans, other alternatives could be implemented to protect helpless animals from a lifetime of cruelty. Public typically believe that chemical testing is only on rats and other rodents; however, a variety of animals such as dogs, cats, bunnies, primates, and farm animals are used as well [2]. Another common misconception is that the lab tested animals are “protected under the presences of ethics committees, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and the Code of Practice.”

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

The human medication always seems to fail because humans and animals have different physiologies. Scientists have tried so hard to find the cure for cancer in mice but have failed. In order to find the right cure they need to use the right cells.” regardless of one’s feelings about animals, it is time for consumers and taxpayers to realize that animal testing waste hundreds of millions of dollars annually and produces and inferior product(Overton).” Some people might think that animal testing is good for many reasons.

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

Even though animals are dying, we could sacrifice animal’s lives and it could save at least one child in the future. “The history of cancer research has been the history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in human beings.” says Dr. Richard Klausner, former director of the US National Cancer Institute. This quote shows how wasteful it is to use mice because humans and mice are so different from each other. "Only 59% of the studies stated the hypothesis or objective of the study and the number and characteristics of the animals used" (“Animal”).

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

However,　 according to the website of Cancer Researh UK, remedies for cancer have been developed thanks to animal testing but even though governments are paying much money to conduct animal

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not only in research but in cosmetic products. ”American women use an average of 12 personal care products per day, so product safety is of great importance... The US Food and Drug Administration endorses the use of animal tests on cosmetics to assure the safety of a product or ingredient.” (ProCon.org, 9) Products that aren't cruelty free are being used daily in average personal routines. The choice to test on an animal first has helped cosmetic chemists to make more safe and efficient products for consumers.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document